RE: [openib-general] openSM

2005-03-15 Thread shaharf
  Hi, Does openSM supports non-fat tree (irregular such as graph) topologies? Abhijeet   [shaharf] Yes. OpenSM supports any type of mesh (connected graph).   ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://open

[openib-general] user_mad.c and 2.6.11

2005-03-15 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Roland, Just ran across this reminder: Should user_mad.c be updated for the following: /* XXX remove once 2.6.11 is released */ Thanks. -- Hal ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-gene

Re: [openib-general] uverbs security

2005-03-15 Thread Troy Benjegerdes
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:23:52AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hi, Roland! > Looking at uverbs kernel module, I notice that in some instances > it passes some parameters from userspace directly to ib core, without > verifying their sanity. > > One example of this is qp attributes in create

[openib-general] mstflint update

2005-03-15 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
I have updated mstflint in the openib repository. revision 1990 fixes a crash and cleans up progress reporting in flash error recovery process. Tested on x86/ia64/i686. -- MST - Michael S. Tsirkin ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.or

[openib-general] [PATCH] set lkey in mthca mpt entry

2005-03-15 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
lkey does not seem to be set in the mpt entry. does this look right? Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: hw/mthca/mthca_mr.c === --- hw/mthca/mthca_mr.c (revision 1983) +++ hw/mthca/mthca_mr.c (working copy)

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] set lkey in mthca mpt entry

2005-03-15 Thread Roland Dreier
Michael> lkey does not seem to be set in the mpt entry. does this Michael> look right? You would know better but my docs say that the lkey field should be set to 0 for SW2HW_MPT and is only used to refer to the original region for memory windows. - R.

[openib-general] Re: user_mad.c and 2.6.11

2005-03-15 Thread Roland Dreier
Hal> Hi Roland, Just ran across this reminder: Hal> Should user_mad.c be updated for the following: /* XXX remove Hal> once 2.6.11 is released */ Yep, I'd apply that patch for sure. - R. ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openi

Re: [openib-general] kernel 2.6.11 and userland packages?

2005-03-15 Thread Tom Duffy
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 19:15 -0600, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > I have in my office a shiny new kernel.org 2.6.11 64 bit kernel running > on my Mac G5, with the drivers/infiniband modules loaded. > > What do I need to do to verify this all works? Do you have the IB card plugged into an IB switch? I

RE: [openib-general] Getting rid of pinned memory requirement

2005-03-15 Thread Michael Krause
At 05:35 PM 3/14/2005, Caitlin Bestler wrote:   > -Original Message- > From: Troy Benjegerdes [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 5:06 PM > To: Caitlin Bestler > Cc: openib-general@openib.org > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Getting rid of pinned memory requirement

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] [MAD] API changes and updates to support RMPP

2005-03-15 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 19:22, Sean Hefty wrote: > This patch updates the MAD API to help provide support for the RMPP > implementation and clients. Notable changes: Wouldn't this change also impact ib_user_mad.h and user_mad.c ? -- Hal ___ openib-gene

Re: [openib-general] uverbs security

2005-03-15 Thread Roland Dreier
Michael> Hi, Roland! Looking at uverbs kernel module, I notice Michael> that in some instances it passes some parameters from Michael> userspace directly to ib core, without verifying their Michael> sanity. Michael> One example of this is qp attributes in create and modify

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] [MAD] API changes and updates to support RMPP

2005-03-15 Thread Sean Hefty
Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 19:22, Sean Hefty wrote: This patch updates the MAD API to help provide support for the RMPP implementation and clients. Notable changes: Wouldn't this change also impact ib_user_mad.h and user_mad.c ? I don't think that they effect those files directl

[openib-general] [PATCH] InfiniBand: remove unsafe use of in_atomic()

2005-03-15 Thread Roland Dreier
Using in_atomic() to decide between GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC is not safe (it doesn't work if CONFIG_PREEMPT=n). Change to just always allocating with GFP_ATOMIC, since we don't know if we can sleep or not. Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-export.orig/drivers/infiniban

Re: [Fwd: Re: [openib-general] Solaris IPoIB MTU with OpenSM]

2005-03-15 Thread Nitin Hande
Hal, On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 12:53, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi again Nitin, > > Finally got a chance to work on this. I have a workaround for you for > now. Real patch later... Let me know if this does the trick for you. It > did for me. > > -- Hal > > Index: osm_sa_mcmember_record.c > ==

Re: [Fwd: Re: [openib-general] Solaris IPoIB MTU with OpenSM]

2005-03-15 Thread Roland Dreier
Nitin> On other hand, on my linux node, if I try to use 8001 Nitin> partition and configure IB interface with IP addr (same Nitin> time while ib0 is using 0x pkey), I get the following Nitin> error, you may want to investigate that I think this is probably an OpenSM issue (

[openib-general] Port of NetPIPE-3.6.2 to OpenIB userspace verbs

2005-03-15 Thread Roland Dreier
I just spent a little time creating a new "ibv" module for NetPIPE that runs on top of the userspace verbs I've been developing on the roland-uverbs branch. This is pretty much a straight port of the current Mellanox VAPI "ib" module, with the main changes coming from the fact that OpenIB doesn't

Re: [Fwd: Re: [openib-general] Solaris IPoIB MTU with OpenSM]

2005-03-15 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Nitin, On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 16:15, Nitin Hande wrote: > This is cool, I have got Solaris IPoIB happily working with the > OpenSM now. It plumbs, pings and snoops on 0x pkey. Great. That's good news. I'll work on a real fix for this now. > On other hand, on my linux node, if I try to use

RE: [openib-general] Port of NetPIPE-3.6.2 to OpenIB userspace verbs

2005-03-15 Thread Woodruff, Robert J
Roland> I just spent a little time creating a new "ibv" module for NetPIPE >that runs on top of the userspace verbs I've been developing on the >roland-uverbs branch. Cool. this will be very useful. Any idea if/when the netpipe folks will release a version of netpipe that has this patch include

Re: [openib-general] Port of NetPIPE-3.6.2 to OpenIB userspace verbs

2005-03-15 Thread Roland Dreier
Robert> Cool. this will be very useful. Any idea if/when the Robert> netpipe folks will release a version of netpipe that has Robert> this patch included ? That's up to the netpipe folks. Posting the patch was the first contact I've made beyond downloading the source yesterday. It mi

RE: [openib-general] Port of NetPIPE-3.6.2 to OpenIB userspace verbs

2005-03-15 Thread Bob Woodruff
>It might be reasonable to wait until the APIs are a little more frozen >and the support has landed on the OpenIB trunk (as I said, userspace >verbs are still only on the roland-uverbs branch). I would estimate a >time frame on the order of weeks for that to happen. > - R. Good point, probably

RE: [openib-general] Port of NetPIPE-3.6.2 to OpenIB userspace verbs

2005-03-15 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 18:11, Bob Woodruff wrote: > Any idea when the user-mode CM support will show up ? I think it should be there in about a couple of weeks. -- Hal ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] alignment check in reg_phys_mr

2005-03-15 Thread Roland Dreier
Thanks, applied. - R. ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] set lkey in mthca mpt entry

2005-03-15 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] set lkey in mthca mpt entry > > Michael> lkey does not seem to be set in the mpt entry. does this > Michael> look right? > > You would know better but my docs say that the lkey field should be > set to 0

Re: [openib-general] Port of NetPIPE-3.6.2 to OpenIB userspace verbs

2005-03-15 Thread Troy Benjegerdes
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:25:50PM -0800, Woodruff, Robert J wrote: > > Roland> I just spent a little time creating a new "ibv" module for > NetPIPE > >that runs on top of the userspace verbs I've been developing on the > >roland-uverbs branch. > > Cool. this will be very useful. Any idea if/wh

[openib-general] How come the CM doesn't implement the state machine?

2005-03-15 Thread Mark Seuss
I have a basic question about the CM. It looks like the gen2 CM doesn't implement the CM state machine as defined in the IB spec. It doesn't perform retransmissions, handle timeouts, etc. Is the current CM API intended as the final API, or is this just an intermediate step on the way to implementin