Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 3/3] librdmacm: add ability to get/set transport specific options

2006-05-10 Thread Jack Morgenstein
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 19:25, Sean Hefty wrote: This is fine for route lookup, but not rdma_get_option. I missed adding rdma_ib.c to my tag file, so missed the rdma_get_option usage of local_sa.c -- sorry about that. My preference is to take the most recent rdma_cm, since there are several

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/3] librdmacm: add ability to get/set transport specific options

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Jack Morgenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] librdmacm: add ability to get/set transport specific options On Tuesday 09 May 2006 19:25, Sean Hefty wrote: This is fine for route lookup, but not rdma_get_option. I missed adding rdma_ib.c to my tag file, so

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/3] librdmacm: add ability to get/set transport specific options

2006-05-10 Thread Jack Morgenstein
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 10:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Maybe just return -ENODATA? Then you don't need to modify any code ... Userspace rdma_get_option() will then also get -ENODATA. OK. We can, therefore, do the following: the dummy procedures in the dummy ib_local_sa.h file will

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] RE: compliancy issue?

2006-05-10 Thread Or Gerlitz
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Can you try this simple patch and see if it fixes your problem? You will need to call rdma_accept() or rdma_reject() after receiving a CONNECT_RESPONSE event. The conn_param to rdma_accept() should be NULL. Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Index: cma.c

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] RE: compliancy issue?

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Or Gerlitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hmm, it seems that QP will get modified to RTS on RTU only. That's bad - I want to move it to RTS on REP, since receive completion might cross RTU and I want to be able to respond to each send immediately. No, looking in the code shows that qp will be

[openib-general] [PATCH] kill dead code in mthca_eq.c

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Kill some dead code in mthca_eq.c Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6.16/drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_eq.c === --- linux-2.6.16.orig/drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_eq.c2006-04-06

Re: [openib-general][RFC][PATCH] core/sysfs.c: ability to reset port counters

2006-05-10 Thread Leonid Arsh
On 5/9/06, Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you need this possibility? Having counters reset locally is going to confuse any performance manager running on the fabric that might be reading the counters remotely. Is it really a must for this to be done by writing to sysfs?

Re: [openib-general][patch review] srp: fmr implementation,

2006-05-10 Thread Tziporet Koren
Roland Dreier wrote: It seems good. I should check it into svn today. I still need to figure out how I want to put it on the for-2.6.18 git branch, since it depends on some earlier fixes that Linus hasn't pulled yet. - R. Thanks, frankly I do not care about 2.6.18 git for now since OFED

[openib-general] Re: sdp can't support many connections (2000)

2006-05-10 Thread zhu shi song
I can't get the latest source from svn co https://openfabrics.org/svn/gen2; in one whole day, it's so slow. Do you think the lastest source solve the problem? Or can you test sdp for 2000 concurrent connections? tks zhu --- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting r. zhu shi

Re: [openib-general][patch review] srp: fmr implementation,

2006-05-10 Thread Talpey, Thomas
At 03:12 PM 5/9/2006, Roland Dreier wrote: BTW, does Mellanox (or anyone else) have any numbers showing that using FMRs makes any difference in performance on a semi-realistic benchmark? Not me. Using the current FMRs to register/deregister windows for each NFS/RDMA operation yields only a slight

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OpenSM: Add SA client API for MultiPathRecord queries

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:08, Hal Rosenstock wrote: OpenSM: Add SA client API for MultiPathRecord queries Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied to trunk only. -- Hal ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org

Re: [openib-general] ip over ib throughtput

2006-05-10 Thread Talpey, Thomas
At 11:13 PM 5/9/2006, Shirley Ma wrote: Have you tried to send payload smaller than 2044? Any difference? You mean MTU or ULP payload? The default NFS reads and writes are 32KB, and in the addressing mode used in these tests they were broken into 8 page-sized RDMA ops. So, there were 9 ops from

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] osmtest: Add rudimentary SA MultiPathRecord tests

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:22, Hal Rosenstock wrote: osmtest: Add rudimentary SA MultiPathRecord tests Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied to trunk only. -- Hal ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org

[openib-general] Re: sdp can't support many connections (2000)

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: sdp can't support many connections (2000) I can't get the latest source from svn co https://openfabrics.org/svn/gen2; in one whole day, it's so slow. I use openib.org/svn/gen2 but I expect its just a redirection. Hmm. We'll be

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 1/3] opensm: low-level QoS configuration

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 14:15, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: Trivial low-level QoS configuration parameters description, definition and processing. Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. Applied to trunk only. -- Hal ___ openib-general

[openib-general] [PATCH] librdmacm abi version

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Sean, could you take a look please? I think it makes sense to make same librdmacm work on as many kernels as possible, so that it's seamless for people to switch kernels. And since backport users install kernel modules or patches anyway, I think it's reasonable to ask them to always install the

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 2/3] opensm: basic QoS implementation

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 14:15, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: Basic low-level QoS implementation. The main procedure (osm_qos_setup()) will be called from resweeper (after configuration refreshing). And then this will setup low level QoS related ports' attributes (PortInfo:VLHighLimit, VL*Arbitration

[openib-general] there is a compilation warning in librdmacm

2006-05-10 Thread Dotan Barak
There is a compilation warning in the file: src/userspace/librdmacm/src/cma.c. here is the warning: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./include -I../libibverbs/include -g -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2 -MT cma.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/cma.Tpo -c s rc/cma.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/cma.o src/cma.c: In

[openib-general] there is a compilation warning in the diags tools

2006-05-10 Thread Dotan Barak
In the driver: openib_gen2-20060510-1209 (REV=7038), there is a compilation warning in the file: src/userspace/management/diags/src/grouping.c src/grouping.c:171: warning: 'is_chassis_switch' defined but not used /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -L../libibcommon -libcommon

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/3] opensm: no_qos global option

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 14:15, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: This new option '--no_qos' (or '-O') ^^ -Q will disable QoS setup globally in OpenSM. Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. Applied to trunk. -- Hal

[openib-general] [PATCH] OpenSM/osmtest: Add rudimentary SA GuidInfoRecord test

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
OpenSM/osmtest: Add rudimentary SA GuidInfoRecord test Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: osmtest/osmtest.c === --- osmtest/osmtest.c (revision 7043) +++ osmtest/osmtest.c (working copy) @@ -4055,6 +4055,59

[openib-general] Re: there is a compilation warning in the diags tools

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 08:31, Dotan Barak wrote: In the driver: openib_gen2-20060510-1209 (REV=7038), there is a compilation warning in the file: src/userspace/management/diags/src/grouping.c src/grouping.c:171: warning: 'is_chassis_switch' defined but not used /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC

[openib-general] RE: [PATCH] OpenSM/osmtest: Add rudimentary SA GuidInfoRecord test

2006-05-10 Thread Eitan Zahavi
Cool. Eitan Zahavi Design Technology Director Mellanox Technologies LTD Tel:+972-4-9097208 Fax:+972-4-9593245 P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL -Original Message- From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 3:45 PM To: openib-general@openib.org Cc:

[openib-general] [PATCH 0/6] iSER (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA) initiator

2006-05-10 Thread Or Gerlitz
Roland, The patch series that follows contains the iSER code which we want to submit upstream for 2.6.18, fixed with the comments which we got in the previous post. LKML reviewers are reminded to CC openib-general@openib.org on your responses. Below is a log and diffstat over the changes from

[openib-general] [PATCH 1/6] iscsi_iser header file

2006-05-10 Thread Or Gerlitz
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser-x/iscsi_iser.h 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200 +++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h 2006-05-10 15:32:01.0 +0300 @@ -0,0 +1,354 @@ +/* + * iSER transport for the Open iSCSI Initiator

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 07/16] ehca: interrupt handling routines

2006-05-10 Thread Pradeep Satyanarayana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/09/2006 04:35:57 PM: Heiko Yes, I agree. It would not be an optimal solution, because Heiko other upper level protocols (e.g. SDP, SRP, etc.) or Heiko userspace verbs would not be affected by this Heiko changes. Nevertheless, how can an improved

[openib-general] [PATCH 2/6] open iscsi iser transport provider code

2006-05-10 Thread Or Gerlitz
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser-x/iscsi_iser.c 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200 +++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c 2006-05-10 15:32:01.0 +0300 @@ -0,0 +1,794 @@ +/* + * iSCSI Initiator over iSER Data-Path + * + *

[openib-general] [PATCH 3/6] iser initiator

2006-05-10 Thread Or Gerlitz
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser-x/iser_initiator.c 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200 +++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c 2006-05-10 15:32:01.0 +0300 @@ -0,0 +1,734 @@ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2004, 2005, 2006

[openib-general] [PATCH 4/6] iser RDMA CM (CMA) and IB verbs interaction

2006-05-10 Thread Or Gerlitz
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser-x/iser_verbs.c 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200 +++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c 2006-05-10 15:32:01.0 +0300 @@ -0,0 +1,827 @@ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2004, 2005, 2006 Voltaire, Inc.

[openib-general] [PATCH 5/6] iser handling of memory for RDMA

2006-05-10 Thread Or Gerlitz
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser-x/iser_memory.c 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200 +++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c 2006-05-10 15:32:01.0 +0300 @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2004, 2005, 2006 Voltaire, Inc.

[openib-general] [PATCH 6/6] iSER's Kconfig and Makefile

2006-05-10 Thread Or Gerlitz
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser-x/Kconfig 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200 +++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-rc3/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/Kconfig 2006-05-10 15:32:01.0 +0300 @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +config INFINIBAND_ISER + tristate ISCSI RDMA Protocol +

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/3] librdmacm: add ability to get/set transport specific options

2006-05-10 Thread Jack Morgenstein
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 10:38, Jack Morgenstein wrote: On Wednesday 10 May 2006 10:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Maybe just return -ENODATA? Then you don't need to modify any code ... Userspace rdma_get_option() will then also get -ENODATA. OK. We can, therefore, do the following:

[openib-general] [DAPL] latest DAPL cannot be compiled with the latest librdmacm

2006-05-10 Thread Dotan Barak
Hi. The latest DAPL cannot be compiled with the latest librdmacm after an API change in the librdmacm. Driver: openib_gen2-20060510-1209 (REV=7038) kernel: 2.6.9-22.ELsmp Arch: x86_64 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../libibverbs/include/infiniband -I../librdmacm/include -I../libibverbs

Re: [openib-general] ip over ib throughtput

2006-05-10 Thread Shirley Ma
Talpey, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/10/2006 03:53:04 AM: At 11:13 PM 5/9/2006, Shirley Ma wrote: Have you tried to send payload smaller than 2044? Any difference? You mean MTU or ULP payload? The default NFS reads and writes are 32KB, and in the addressing mode used in these

[openib-general] [Bug 78] OFED 1.0 RC 4 iser install fails if patches already applied

2006-05-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-10 07:55 --- I am not sure to follow what are you reffering to by install script... looking in the spec file which you can extract by rmp2cpio oiscsi-2.6-16.src.rpm | cpio -id on

[openib-general] [PATCH] mthca: ioremap fix (was: Problem with our SB and your IB Card)

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Addresses for ioremap must be calculated off of pci_resource_start - we can't use the bus address as seen by the HCA for that. Based on patch by Klaus Smolin. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: openib/drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_mr.c

Re: [openib-general][patch review] srp: fmr implementation,

2006-05-10 Thread Vu Pham
Roland Dreier wrote: BTW, does Mellanox (or anyone else) have any numbers showing that using FMRs makes any difference in performance on a semi-realistic benchmark? I'm using xdd to test the performance www.ioperformance.com/products.htm The target is Mellanox srp target reference

Re: [openib-general][PATCH] srp: tuned parameters,

2006-05-10 Thread Vu Pham
Roland Dreier wrote: I finally looked this over. First, this should be two patches: making srp_sg_tablesize tunable should be a separate change from making it possible to specify max_cmd_per_lun for a target. OK, I'll break it to two patches The srp_sg_tablesize change makes the default

Re: [openib-general][patch review] srp: fmr implementation,

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Thomas I am planning to test this some more in the next few Thomas weeks, but what I'd really like to see is an IBTA Thomas 1.2-compliant implementation, and one that operated on Thomas work queue entries (not synchronous verbs). Is that being Thomas worked on? No current

Re: [openib-general][RFC][PATCH] core/sysfs.c: ability to reset port counters

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Leonid A user space application is an option too, although I Leonid think it's nice to have a 'built in' kernel feature. As Hal pointed out, there already is an app to do this. So I don't see much need to put it into the kernel. - R. ___

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OpenSM/osmtest: Add rudimentary SA GuidInfoRecord test

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 08:45, Hal Rosenstock wrote: OpenSM/osmtest: Add rudimentary SA GuidInfoRecord test Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied to both trunk and 1.0 branch. -- Hal ___ openib-general mailing list

Re: [openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
Tom Tucker wrote: Its OK to call rdma_reject on active side as well, isn't it? You'll get -EINVAL on iWARP if you do this For IB, rdma_reject can be called on the active side if the user is managing their own QP states, or is SDP. How does iWarp support userspace QPs? - Sean

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] RE: compliancy issue?

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: No, looking in the code shows that qp will be changed to rtr and then rts ***before*** sending the RTU since you will call rdma_accept which in turn will call cma_rep_recv Right, missed that, thanks! I was wandering why it was behaving not the way I expected it to

[openib-general] IBDM Changes Coordination

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Eitan, Yesterday, you checked in some changes to ibdm for OFED on the 1.0 branch. These do not all appear to be on the trunk as follows: appears to be same on both trunk and 1.0/ofed: U ofed/ibutils/ibdm/datamodel/Fabric.h appear to need merging to trunk U

[openib-general] [TRIVIAL][PATCH] Add rds to Kconfig and Makefile

2006-05-10 Thread Bob Woodruff
Not sure who maintains these, but the following patch adds RDS to the Kconfig and Makefile in drivers/infiniband woody diff -Naurp linux-2.6.9/drivers/infiniband/Kconfig linux-2.6.9-fixups/drivers/infiniband/Kconfig --- linux-2.6.9/drivers/infiniband/Kconfig 2006-05-10 08:41:42.0

Re: [openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: [openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits. Tom Tucker wrote: Its OK to call rdma_reject on active side as well, isn't it? You'll get -EINVAL on iWARP if you do this For IB, rdma_reject can be called on the active side if the user

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/3] librdmacm: add ability to get/set transport specific options

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
Jack Morgenstein wrote: Userspace rdma_get_option() will then also get -ENODATA. OK. We can, therefore, do the following: the dummy procedures in the dummy ib_local_sa.h file will return -ENODATA for all get operations and for ib_create_path_cursor(), and -ENOSYS for

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] RE: compliancy issue?

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If this is working for you, I will commit the change. Just let me know. Thanks! It looks OK but I didn't test it yet. (It looked like Or answered your questions.) Yes, he did. -- MST ___ openib-general

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/3] librdmacm: add ability to get/set transport specific options

2006-05-10 Thread Jack Morgenstein
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 19:34, Sean Hefty wrote: You could also just include the local SA cache. If you want it enabled by default, you can change cache_timeout or paths_per_dest to 0 where they are declared. I assume you mean disabled. Looks like setting cache_timeout to zero as the

Re: [openib-general] there is a compilation warning in librdmacm

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
Dotan Barak wrote: There is a compilation warning in the file: src/userspace/librdmacm/src/cma.c. Thanks - I committed a fix for this. It should have been a void. - Sean ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/3] librdmacm: add ability to get/set transport specific options

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
Jack Morgenstein wrote: I assume you mean disabled. Uhm.. yes - that's what I meant. Looks like setting cache_timeout to zero as the default is good enough: in sa_db_init(), cache_timeout remains 0 when translated to jiffies, resulting in paths_per_dest being set to zero as well.

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] librdmacm abi version

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
Thanks - committed. - Sean ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/3] librdmacm: add ability to get/set transport specific options

2006-05-10 Thread Jack Morgenstein
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 19:54, Sean Hefty wrote: Correct. Good. I'll add local_sa to OFED tomorrow morning, and patch local_sa.c as indicated so that it is disabled by default. - Jack ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org

[openib-general] [PATCH] opensm: complib: cleanup unused cl_obj files

2006-05-10 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
Cleanup unused cl_obj source and header files from complib. Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- osm/complib/Makefile.am |3 osm/complib/cl_obj.c | 736 --- osm/complib/libosmcomp.map | 12 - osm/include/Makefile.am |

[openib-general] [PATCH] opensm: complib: cleanup unsused cl_reqmgr files

2006-05-10 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
Cleanup unused cl_reqmgr source and header files from complib. Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- osm/complib/Makefile.am |3 osm/complib/cl_reqmgr.c | 297 osm/complib/libosmcomp.map |5 osm/include/Makefile.am

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] mthca: ioremap fix (was: Problem with our SB and your IB Card)

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Thanks, applied. I didn't see the original mail you seem to be replying to. Was it off-list? - R. ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit

[openib-general] [Bug 22] IBED RC2 Installation fails

2006-05-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Additional Comments From

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] kill dead code in mthca_eq.c

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Thanks, applied. ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 0/6] iSER (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA) initiator

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Or To have this code compiled you would need to get the iscsi Or updates for 2.6.18 into your source tree, that is pull/sync Or with include/scsi and drivers/scsi of the scsi-misc-2.6 git Or tree. What is the URL of this git tree? (Since git works on changesets and not on paths a

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] mthca: ioremap fix (was: Problem with our SB and your IB Card)

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mthca: ioremap fix (was: Problem with our SB and your IB Card) Thanks, applied. I didn't see the original mail you seem to be replying to. Was it off-list? Yes. -- MST ___

[openib-general] [PATCH] opensm: complib: remove nonexsted symbols from tha map file

2006-05-10 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
This removes nonexisted symbols from comlib map file. Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- osm/complib/libosmcomp.map | 13 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/osm/complib/libosmcomp.map b/osm/complib/libosmcomp.map index

Re: [openib-general][PATCH] srp: throttle command per lun,

2006-05-10 Thread Vu Pham
Patch to throttle command per lun when adding target. Signed-off-by: Vu Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c === --- infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c (revision 7075) +++ infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c (working copy) @@

Re: [openib-general][PATCH] srp: param sg_tablesize,

2006-05-10 Thread Vu Pham
Hi Roland, This patch: + introduces srp_sg_tablesize as module parameter - default value is 16 + adjusts SRP_MAX_IU_LEN, SRP_MAX_INDIRECT from srp_sg_tablesize Signed-off-by: Vu Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c

[openib-general]  ご利用アカウ ントについて

2006-05-10 Thread 須藤
スドーです!そろそろ旅行に行きたいシーズンですね! 今度の週末って時間空いてないですか?操さん今度も一人の週末を過ごす予定らしいです。もし時間あいてたら顔合わせなんてどうですか?操さんとならきっと楽しい日になると思いますよ(^^) 操さんの簡単なプロフィールを公開してます。 http://pinpiko.net/pb/index.php?b=2ここから連絡もできますよ! 時間を合わせて電話したいって言ってたのでまずはメールしてみてくださいね!平日のお昼は基本的に何時でも電話できる操さんです。

Re: [openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: BTW, Sean, could you please explain why is RESPONSE event IB-specific? Does not it match Syn/Ack in the TCP 3-way handshake? I didn't think that even iWarp exposed the TCP connection messages to the users. Plus iWarp connections can be formed over an existing TCP

[openib-general] [PATCH] IB/sdp: Fix build on sparc64

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
At least sparc64 requires linux/dma-mapping.h to be included to pick up the defines of DMA_TO_DEVICE et al. Add this include to sdp_bcopy.c so SDP will build on sparc64. Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- BTW, it would probably look nicer to include rdma/xxx after linux/yyy

[openib-general] [PATCH] IB/sdp: Fix warning on 32-bit architectures

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
The current definition of SDP_OP_RECV leads to: drivers/infiniband/ulp/sdp/sdp_bcopy.c:208: warning: integer constant is too large for long type on 32-bit architectures. Fix this by making it explicitly u64. Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- infiniband/ulp/sdp/sdp.h

Re: [openib-general] Openmpi/xhpl kernel crash 2.6.17-rc3 with Pathscale htx

2006-05-10 Thread Bryan O'Sullivan
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 16:36 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: I don't see the crash under ip over ib (ran for over an hour), the crash occurs immediately upon attempting to start xhpl. Hi, Roger - Thanks for the report. We've recently fixed some locking problems that may help with this, but I

RE: [openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

2006-05-10 Thread Caitlin Bestler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Tucker wrote: Its OK to call rdma_reject on active side as well, isn't it? You'll get -EINVAL on iWARP if you do this For IB, rdma_reject can be called on the active side if the user is managing their own QP states, or is SDP. How does iWarp support

[openib-general] bugs I see as must-fix for OFED 1.0 rc5

2006-05-10 Thread Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
SDP overhaul49 OFED 1.0: MVAPICH won't compile on ppc6451 OFED 1.0 rc4: SRP not available for RHEL4 U357 OFED 1.0 rc4: rdma_cm does not work for uDAPL59 OFED 1.0: Open MPI not configured correctly to find shlibs61 OFED 1.0 rc4: RDS does not load on RHEL4 U362 OFED 1.0 rc4: too many SRP

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] IB/sdp: Fix warning on 32-bit architectures

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: [PATCH] IB/sdp: Fix warning on 32-bit architectures The current definition of SDP_OP_RECV leads to: drivers/infiniband/ulp/sdp/sdp_bcopy.c:208: warning: integer constant is too large for long type on 32-bit architectures. Fix

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 0/6] iSER (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA) initiator

2006-05-10 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 5/10/06, Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or To have this code compiled you would need to get the iscsi Or updates for 2.6.18 into your source tree, that is pull/sync Or with include/scsi and drivers/scsi of the scsi-misc-2.6 git Or tree. What is the URL of this git

[openib-general] Peace

2006-05-10 Thread Melinda Kennedy
http://www.islam-guide.com/frm-ch3-10.htm What Do Muslims Believe about Jesus? Muslims respect and revere Jesus (peace be upon him). They consider him one of the greatest of God’s messengers to mankind. The Quran confirms his virgin birth, and a

[openib-general] RE: IBDM Changes Coordination

2006-05-10 Thread Eitan Zahavi
Thanks for clarifying the policy. I will check in the same patch to the trunk ASAP. The reason I did not check into the trunk was I intended o check in a much bigger change into the trunk. Eitan Zahavi Design Technology Director Mellanox Technologies LTD Tel:+972-4-9097208 Fax:+972-4-9593245

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] IB/sdp: Fix warning on 32-bit architectures

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Yeah, I guess so. I was being anal about archs where u64 == unsigned long, but I don't think it actually matters. And long long 128 bit? Should be fine even then. No, real architectures where long long and long are both 64 bits, but u64 is typedef'ed to just long. But leaving out the

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] IB/sdp: Fix warning on 32-bit architectures

2006-05-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No, real architectures where long long and long are both 64 bits Thought so. -- MST ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To

Re: [openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

2006-05-10 Thread Tom Tucker
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 09:26 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: Tom Tucker wrote: Its OK to call rdma_reject on active side as well, isn't it? You'll get -EINVAL on iWARP if you do this For IB, rdma_reject can be called on the active side if the user is managing their own QP states, or is

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 0/6] iSER (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA) initiator

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Or OK., I see now that as of few hours ago the second iscsi Or update for 2.6.18 was commited there which means iser should Or compile with it, you can go ahead pull it! Great, I've got it. Can you resend the iSER patches with changelog entries for each patch and a Signed-off-by:

RE: [openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

2006-05-10 Thread Caitlin Bestler
Tom Tucker wrote: So... all that said, I could in fact support rdma_reject on an active side connection. But this would effectively reduce to a QP -- ERROR and I doubt this matches the semantics you're looking for. And you could send an RST. There's just no way to send any user

[openib-general] pebble designation

2006-05-10 Thread Bertie Byrd
___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [openib-general] ip over ib throughtput

2006-05-10 Thread Talpey, Thomas
At 10:05 AM 5/10/2006, Shirley Ma wrote: I meant payload less than or equal to 2044, not IB MTU. IPoIB can only send =2044 payload per ib_send_post(). NFS/RDMA in this case send 32KB per ib_post_send(). Actually, in the cases I mentioned earlier, the NFS/RDMA server is posting 8 4KB RDMA

[openib-general] すどう、旅行に 行ってきます!

2006-05-10 Thread 須藤
そこにある道を行かぬは日本国民の恥と知りました。北へ、向かおうと思います。 旅立つ前に操さんからの伝言を伝えておきますね! 電話は11時〜17時までの間だったら平気だって言ってました。非通知でもいいそうですよ! http://pinpiko.net/pb/index.php?b=2ここのページから操さんと連絡が取れるので「何時くらいにかけるから」って言う連絡をすれば平気みたいです(^^)

[openib-general] [git pull] please pull for-linus branch of infiniband.git

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Linus, please pull from master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus The changes and patch are: Michael S. Tsirkin:

Re: [openib-general][patch review] srp: fmr implementation,

2006-05-10 Thread Talpey, Thomas
At 11:36 AM 5/10/2006, Vu Pham wrote: I can get ~780 MB/s max without FMRs and ~920 MB/s with FMRs (using 256 KB sequential read direct IO request) In the without case, what memory registration strategy? Also, what is the CPU utilization on the initiator in the two runs (i.e. is the 780MB/s run

Re: [openib-general][patch review] srp: fmr implementation,

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Thomas In the without case, what memory registration strategy? Thomas Also, what is the CPU utilization on the initiator in the Thomas two runs (i.e. is the 780MB/s run CPU limited)? The without case is just using ib_get_dma_mr() for direct access to all of memory. - R.

[openib-general] [PATCH] IB/ipath: Properly terminate PCI ID table

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
The ipath driver's table of PCI IDs needs a { 0, } entry at the end. This makes all of the device aliases visible to userspace so hotplug loads the module for all supported devices. Without the patch, modinfo ipath_core only shows: alias: pci:v1FC1d000Dsv*sd*bc*sc*i*

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] IB/ipath: Properly terminate PCI ID table

2006-05-10 Thread Bryan O'Sullivan
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:38 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org

[openib-general] question regarding GRH flag in ib_ah_attr

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
For context, I'm trying to work backwards from send a message on a UD QP to determine what information is needed and how it is obtained. Does anyone know how the user determines if the grh flag should be set in the ib_ah_attr when allocating an ib_ah? Do they do this by examining the GIDs in a

[openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
As the 2.6.17 release cycle starts to wrap up, I thought it would be a good time to send out a report on my status, and a request for patches. All I have queued up for 2.6.17 that isn't upstream already is the one-liner patch fixing the ipath PCI device ID table. If there is anything else you

Re: [openib-general] question regarding GRH flag in ib_ah_attr

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Sean Does anyone know how the user determines if the grh flag Sean should be set in the ib_ah_attr when allocating an ib_ah? Sean Do they do this by examining the GIDs in a path record? Good question. It's always needed for multicast, of course. For unicast, I guess one could look

RE: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
- CMA. Sean, I think there have been a lot of updates to the cma since the last time you updated me. Can you send me a patch to resync my for-2.6.18 branch with the latest code for upstream? I will start on this by the end of the week. - Sean

Re: [openib-general][patch review] srp: fmr implementation,

2006-05-10 Thread Tom Tucker
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 08:53 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Thomas I am planning to test this some more in the next few Thomas weeks, but what I'd really like to see is an IBTA Thomas 1.2-compliant implementation, and one that operated on Thomas work queue entries (not synchronous

Re: [openib-general] question regarding GRH flag in ib_ah_attr

2006-05-10 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:44:42PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Sean Does anyone know how the user determines if the grh flag Sean should be set in the ib_ah_attr when allocating an ib_ah? Sean Do they do this by examining the GIDs in a path record? Good question. It's always

Re: [openib-general][patch review] srp: fmr implementation,

2006-05-10 Thread Tom Tucker
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 08:36 -0700, Vu Pham wrote: Roland Dreier wrote: BTW, does Mellanox (or anyone else) have any numbers showing that using FMRs makes any difference in performance on a semi-realistic benchmark? I'm using xdd to test the performance

RE: [openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

2006-05-10 Thread Tom Tucker
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 14:20 -0700, Caitlin Bestler wrote: Tom Tucker wrote: So... all that said, I could in fact support rdma_reject on an active side connection. But this would effectively reduce to a QP -- ERROR and I doubt this matches the semantics you're looking for.

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-10 Thread Grant Grundler
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:41:40PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: ... For 2.6.18, I have the following major things already queued (in addition to a trivial mthca patch): SDP is still missing. I just think SDP is a substantial peice of the story for IB adoption. Sorry, I won't be able to

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH][UVERBS][RFC] node type in ibv_context

2006-05-10 Thread Tom Tucker
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 22:13 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Tom Here's a patch that puts a node_type in the ibv_context. Two problems: - It breaks the ABI (which is frozen for the libibverbs 1.0 series) - Even when we're ready to break ABI, I think node_type should be in struct

Re: [openib-general] question regarding GRH flag in ib_ah_attr

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 19:44, Roland Dreier wrote: Sean Does anyone know how the user determines if the grh flag Sean should be set in the ib_ah_attr when allocating an ib_ah? Sean Do they do this by examining the GIDs in a path record? Good question. It's always needed for

Re: [openib-general] question regarding GRH flag in ib_ah_attr

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 19:35, Sean Hefty wrote: For context, I'm trying to work backwards from send a message on a UD QP to determine what information is needed and how it is obtained. Does anyone know how the user determines if the grh flag should be set in the ib_ah_attr when allocating an

Re: [openib-general] question regarding GRH flag in ib_ah_attr

2006-05-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 21:26, Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 19:44, Roland Dreier wrote: Sean Does anyone know how the user determines if the grh flag Sean should be set in the ib_ah_attr when allocating an ib_ah? Sean Do they do this by examining the GIDs in a path

  1   2   >