Re: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-11-02 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 01:02, Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/18/2005 03:40:47 PM: On Mon, 2005-10-18 at 10:07, Kevin Reilly wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 10:07, Hal Rosenstock wrote: Should this code work, because it seems that out_dev is a kernel

Re: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-11-01 Thread Pradeep Satyanarayana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/18/2005 03:40:47 PM: On Mon, 2005-10-18 at 10:07, Kevin Reilly wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 10:07, Hal Rosenstock wrote: Should this code work, because it seems that out_dev is a kernel address (platform: PPC64) which cannot accessed by a userspace

Re: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-10-31 Thread Sean Hefty
Kevin Reilly wrote: Thanks Sean, I think the rdma_resolve_addr() does what we want. Translate a local IP to a ib_device structure that i can use in the ibverbs. What we want to do is pretty simple and we won't need to create a connection. Based on your description, I think that

[openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-10-29 Thread Kevin Reilly
Thanks Sean, I think the rdma_resolve_addr() does what we want. Translate a local IP to a ib_device structure that i can use in the ibverbs. What we want to do is pretty simple and we won't need to create a connection. Can we have a discussion on the timeframe for this? Kevin J. Reilly STSM,

Re: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-10-20 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 12:35, Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote: Is there a ballpark estimate (or a plan) of when CMA willl be ready? Estimates like by end of Q4 2005 or end of Q1 2006 will help us make some decisions if we should submit a patch for this bug or wait for CMA. CMA is ready now. It's

Re: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-10-20 Thread Sean Hefty
Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote: Is there a ballpark estimate (or a plan) of when CMA willl be ready? Estimates like by end of Q4 2005 or end of Q1 2006 will help us make some decisions if we should submit a patch for this bug or wait for CMA. The kernel CMA is ready today. An additional change

Re: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-10-20 Thread Kevin Reilly
Subject Re: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

RE: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-10-20 Thread Sean Hefty
Will the CMA have that the same function ib_at_route_by_ip() that we are using in libibat? The CMA will resolve IB routes based on source/destination TCP/IP addresses if that is what you are looking for. It will then establish connections based on those routes. You may want to look at

Re: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-10-19 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 18:40, Kevin Reilly wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-18 at 10:07, Kevin Reilly wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 10:07, Hal Rosenstock wrote: Should this code work, because it seems that out_dev is a kernel address (platform: PPC64) which cannot accessed by a userspace

[openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-10-17 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Heiko, On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 09:54, Heiko J Schick wrote: Hello Roland and Hal, did you changed the mailing-list settings, because it seems that I can sent anymore to openib-general. Must I be a member nowdays? I apologize when you received my message twice. You shouldn't need to be a

Re: [openib-general] Re: Questions about libibat, ib_uat, and ib_a

2005-10-17 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 10:07, Hal Rosenstock wrote: Should this code work, because it seems that out_dev is a kernel address (platform: PPC64) which cannot accessed by a userspace program. Via GDB I can see that rt has the following content: The address is rt-out_dev =