On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Richard Elling
wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2012, at 11:45 AM, George Wilson wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Speaking of 4K sectors, I've taken a slightly different approach that fixes
>> this outside of ZFS. The idea is to allow sd to override the
>> physical-block-size which ZFS w
On Apr 29, 2012, at 11:45 AM, George Wilson wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>
Also, I posted a bug report for it here
https://www.illumos.org/issues/2663
>>>
>>> Thanks :-). We can now track the progress of the OI-specific
>>> discussion about this
One possibility:
One of the recent pre-stable updates came with an image format
update, which older pkg won't be able to read
Another possibility:
The same update is umask-sensitive, so if you have a restrictive
umask, /var/pkg will become unreadable (making it 0755 again should
wake things
On Apr 29, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 02:45:05PM -0400, George Wilson wrote:
>> On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>>
> Also, I posted a bug report for it here
> https://www.illumos.org/issues/2663
>>>
>>> Seems the old post about
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 02:45:05PM -0400, George Wilson wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>
> >>> Also, I posted a bug report for it here
> >>> https://www.illumos.org/issues/2663
> >
> > Seems the old post about the initial patch is here
> > https://www.illumos.or
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>>> Also, I posted a bug report for it here
>>> https://www.illumos.org/issues/2663
>>
>> Thanks :-). We can now track the progress of the OI-specific
>> discussion about this issue.
>
> Seems the old post about the initial patch is here
> > Also, I posted a bug report for it here
> > https://www.illumos.org/issues/2663
>
> Thanks :-). We can now track the progress of the OI-specific
> discussion about this issue.
Seems the old post about the initial patch is here
https://www.illumos.org/issues/453
After som discussion on #open
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
>> > The patch allowing this option was, for various reasons, rejected,
>> > and no such option currently exists.
>>
>> Are you able to forward a link to the reasons?
>>
>> I'm asking because were they technical (i.e. something breaks),
> >> Finally, it looks like OI has some support for 4k sector disks:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4883847
> >>
> >> and ZFS pools can be created with the 'zpool create block-size 4096
> >> ...'
> >> option.
> >
> > The patch allowing this option was, for variou
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
>> Finally, it looks like OI has some support for 4k sector disks:
>>
>> http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4883847
>>
>> and ZFS pools can be created with the 'zpool create block-size 4096
>> ...'
>> option.
>
> T
> As for using Advanced Format disks with 4K sectors in ZFS pools, the
> worst
> case scenario would be that these disks can be used in a
> backwards-compatible legacy 512 byte sector format but with slower r/w
> performance. Also, Hitachi provide a Windows utility to re-align 4k
> sectors on their
thank you Andy for this info
let us know your experience when you'll setup-up the disks
On 04/29/2012 09:24 AM, andy thomas wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Enrico wrote:
did a little research, just because i'm curious about this, my storage needs
are much lower :)
they say
(http://forums.overcloc
On 29/04/2012, at 4:34 PM, Achim Wolpers wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After updating my global zone to OI_151a3, I also updated my non global zones
> by executing
>
> zoneadm zonename detatch
>
> and
>
> zoneadm zonename attach -u
>
> After that procedure I get the following error on all pkg commands:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Enrico wrote:
did a little research, just because i'm curious about this, my storage needs
are much lower :)
they say
(http://forums.overclockers.com.au/showpost.php?p=13963218&postcount=4727)
that SB820M south-bridge on n40l has a limit of 3.2tb for hdd capacity. but
t
14 matches
Mail list logo
