On 17/04/2013 8:25 PM, Aneurin Price wrote:
On 17 April 2013 03:53, Carl Brewer wrote:
Further to my original post, I have a new (desktop, I know ... but I am on a
tight budget) Intel MB with an i5-3750 CPU and 32 GB of desktop RAM.
Booting the 151a7 live DVD shows that it thinks it's a 32 bit
[catching up... comment below]
On Apr 18, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Timothy Coalson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Sebastian Gabler
> wrote:
>
>> Am 18.04.2013 16:28, schrieb
>> openindiana-discuss-request@**openindiana.org
>> :
>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:17:47 +
[catching up...]
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:14 AM, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
> Am 19.04.2013 11:22, schrieb openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org:
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:03:32 -0500
> From: Timothy Coalson
> To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
>
> Subject: Re: [OpenInd
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Sebastian Gabler >wrote:
>
>
> One of Elling's posts cited by another poster did
>> take that into account, but the graphs don't load due to url changes (and
>> they seem to have the wrong MIME type wit
On 2013-04-19 11:20, Justin Warwick wrote:
I broke the mirror on the
"media" pool (i can't remember whey I did that). Since that time I have
been getting that message which seems to mean somehow the disk is halfway
stuck in the mirror.
Agreeing with George's answer, I'd like to inquire: how did
Justin,
More than likely c3d1 contain a label from an old pool. If you run 'zdb
-l /dev/dsk/c3d1s0' you should be able to if one exists. If does contain
information for an old pool then using the '-f' option when attaching
will solve your problem and relabel the device with the new pool
infor
Am 19.04.2013 11:22, schrieb openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org:
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:03:32 -0500
From: Timothy Coalson
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] vdev reliability was:
Recommendations for fast storage
Message-I
I kinda assumed that the packets would have been translated to be from the
machine on the firewall ... it was only after snooping from the firewall
that I noticed the originator ...
I'm going to have to "delegate" because I don't trust the windows server to
know anything about the outside world.
We've all been there. :(
On 04/19/2013 08:08 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
ignore me, i'm just being stupid!
on the accelerated host I needed to add the route to the external server :(
On 19 April 2013 12:58, Jonathan Adams wrote:
On 19 April 2013 11:45, Gary Gendel wrote:
Jon,
I redirect
ignore me, i'm just being stupid!
on the accelerated host I needed to add the route to the external server :(
On 19 April 2013 12:58, Jonathan Adams wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 11:45, Gary Gendel wrote:
>
>> Jon,
>>
>> I redirect ports fine using nat. I'm trying to understand what's
>> differe
On 19 April 2013 11:45, Gary Gendel wrote:
> Jon,
>
> I redirect ports fine using nat. I'm trying to understand what's
> different between your and my setup. For example in my ipnat.conf file I
> have:
>
> rdr bge0 0.0.0.0/0 port 2022 -> 10.101.1.9 port 22 tcp/udp
>
> Where bge0 is my external
Jon,
I redirect ports fine using nat. I'm trying to understand what's
different between your and my setup. For example in my ipnat.conf file
I have:
rdr bge0 0.0.0.0/0 port 2022 -> 10.101.1.9 port 22 tcp/udp
Where bge0 is my external nic (bge1 is my internal nic). BTW, I use
0.0.0.0/0 so
more specific addresses to forward:
root@oldfluffy:/etc/ipf# ipnat -l
List of active MAP/Redirect filters:
rdr iprb0 n.n.62.35/32 port 143 -> 192.168.0.12 port 143 tcp
rdr bge0 192.168.0.65/32 port 143 -> 192.168.0.12 port 143 tcp
List of active sessions:
RDR 192.168.0.12 143 <- ->n.n.62.35
Actually in the real system I am trying to forward a port from an external
address (on the internet, the address I hid) to an internal RDP server
(port 3389 tcp) ... but for testing I forwarded to an internal IMAP server
iprb0 is the external interface, bge0 is the internal.
I added bge0 to see i
jrw@valinor:~$ pfexec zpool attach media c2d1 c3d1
invalid vdev specification
use '-f' to override the following errors:
/dev/dsk/c3d1s0 is part of active ZFS pool rpool. Please see zpool(1M).
Yet I do not see c3d1 in zpool status. Initially I had 4 disks total, all
Seagate SATA drives, two separ
15 matches
Mail list logo
