I am running OpenIndiana (oi_151a8) and have two NICs aggregated using LACP
connected to a Cisco WS-C3560G-48TS. Both the server and the switch show
the aggregate link as up. But while link layer traffic is visible ('snoop'
shows ARP requests etc), I can not pass any IP traffic (ping, ssh all
fail)
Routing table shows the following: netstat -r
default 192.168.0.1 UG 2 3 aggr1
arc01 arc01UH 2 48 lo0
192.168.0.0 192.168.0.200 U3 1 aggr1
Regards,
Antony Brooke-Wood
Mobile: +61 404 460 326
On 10 September 2013 18:14, Antony Brooke-Wood wrote:
>
On 10/09/2013 10:14, Antony Brooke-Wood wrote:
I am running OpenIndiana (oi_151a8) and have two NICs aggregated using LACP
connected to a Cisco WS-C3560G-48TS. Both the server and the switch show
the aggregate link as up. But while link layer traffic is visible ('snoop'
shows ARP requests etc), I
Hi Udo,
I had the switch in access mode already (though I did try to force it as a
trunk out of frustration). The switch config is as follows:
interface Port-channel10
description ARC01_LACP
switchport mode access
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/41
description ARC01_LACP
switchport mode access
c
> You AD server is probably being slow, so request threads calling it all get
> stuck.
Um, you may be right, we have many sites (correctly setup in site and
services), 2 DCs at head office with the openindiana fileserver, but the
"thread creation refused - 40 threads currently active" occurs o
Hello,
I'll have a shot, though it's been a while since I've dealt with NWAM
issues...
On 09/09/13 22:22, axelle_apvri...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello,
I have a strange issue with my network on OpenIndiana: I have network
access "most of the time", and then suddenly loose it.
Usually, when I re-iss
That's quite some offtopic discussion my original question triggered.
Since the original question remains unanswered I'll add my 2cents to
"the zfs on a cloud instance" discussion as well.
The main complaints seem to be ram consumption by ZFS and performance
issues in a "cloud/vm environment"
Fir
Hm, looks ok so far. Can you ping yourself on the
interface IP ?
The usual stuff is to check /etc/hostname.aggr1,
/etc/hosts (should be a link to /etc/inet/hosts)
should contain the IP adress and name of the host
on that interface (it seems it does not, since your
routing table shows only the IP,
I can ping the interface - but I can actually do that even when both the
underlying NICs are unplugged.
I'm not at work, but I know that /etc/hostname.aggr1 didn't exist when I
checked.
I'll check the other things you mentioned tomorrow - thanks.
Regards,
Antony Brooke-Wood
Mobile: +61 404 460 32
On 2013-09-10 12:50, wessels wrote:
That's quite some offtopic discussion my original question triggered.
Since the original question remains unanswered I'll add my 2cents to
"the zfs on a cloud instance" discussion as well.
...
So Illumos is certainly not the last word in operating systems like
On 10/09/2013 13:54, Antony Brooke-Wood wrote:
I can ping the interface - but I can actually do that even when both the
underlying NICs are unplugged.
I'm not at work, but I know that /etc/hostname.aggr1 didn't exist when I
checked.
I'll check the other things you mentioned tomorrow - thanks.
O
Is there a pkg available for sshfs?
Are there other repos accessable to pkg than the default
'http://pkg.openindiana.org/dev/'
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-
There is the "Spec files Extras" repository , with info in the wiki:
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Spec+Files+Extra+Repository
I am also compiling some packages myself and will be making a repo available.
For myself I like to stay on the newest versions of software as they are
released, rather
@Jim
Shared storage is indeed another interesting point. I don't completely
follow what you do with your ESX datastores. VMFS is a clustered FS. ESX
doesn't provide any redundancy. Their VMFS best pratices recommend that you
should use one VMFS datastore per lun. So all blades running ESX and
shari
Harry Putnam writes:
This probably the only good reason to top post:
Please disregard my query for help. It turned out to be an
aftermarket filebrowser (Directory Opus) I was using. It was not
issuing the prompt for authentication. The regular windows explorer
does and once its been authentic
Running 151a8
I'm trying to access some of the smb shares I've created from a win7
box. It can see the shares but cannot access any of them
smb/server is running
I've added this line to /etc/pam.conf:
,
| other password required pam_smb_passwd.so.1 nowarn
`
I've joined the windows work
On 09/10/13 12:31, Ben Taylor wrote:
> I really can't see the wisdom of splitting out /usr from / on a ZFS file
> system. I had an open bug with Sun in 2009 regarding the separate /var
> partition, and we went months arguing with support regarding whether or not
> that was a supported configuratio
I really can't see the wisdom of splitting out /usr from / on a ZFS file
system. I had an open bug with Sun in 2009 regarding the separate /var
partition, and we went months arguing with support regarding whether or not
that was a supported configuration.
The main issue was that single user and f
Milan,
how did you exactly upgrade ? From a stock a7, one of
the hipster builds, with your JDS on top or without ?
I tried from a7 and hipster 3 weeks ago, and both upgrades
don't have the application menu.
On 07/09/2013 12:41, Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
Udo Grabowski (IMK) píše v so 07. 09. 2013 v
On 09/09/2013 01:35 PM, Tomasz Konojacki wrote:
Hi!
I had exactly the same problem. Solution is simple, you have to use 2G.header
instead of 1G.header, you can download it here (
http://dlc.openindiana.org/isos/2G.header ).
That explains it! It worked like a charm once I rewrote the USB st
Running 151a8
Now I've got oi running and becoming slightly familiar with zpool and
zfs cmds, I need some coaching as to how to employ the zfs fs.
My general aim is to backup other computers but also want to have a
few zfs fs that serve a windows 7 box and holds lots of pictures and
other graphic
My advice is to keep it simple - from what you describe, there isn't any
reason I can see to create more than 2 file systems.
One thing you might consider is setting up CrashPlan with your server.
It has a native solaris installation and for $5 a month, you can have all
of your data replicated of
Harry,
Wish there were one answer… Even before ZFS layout, zpool design brings a lot
of factors into play. But to your question on layouts: Among our considerations
is the one you're dealing with; 'How granular to get?'
Some features of ZFS help drive our thinking about our architectures: The
Hi,
On út, 2013-09-10 at 23:29 +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
> Milan,
> how did you exactly upgrade ? From a stock a7, one of
> the hipster builds, with your JDS on top or without ?
> I tried from a7 and hipster 3 weeks ago, and both upgrades
> don't have the application menu.
>
stock a7 to
On 11/09/2013 01:44, Antony Brooke-Wood wrote:
My advice is to keep it simple - from what you describe, there isn't any
reason I can see to create more than 2 file systems.
One thing you might consider is setting up CrashPlan with your server.
It has a native solaris installation and for $5 a m
25 matches
Mail list logo
