Hi,
On st, 2013-10-09 at 17:11 -0400, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> >
> > how relevant is obsolete closed source technology?
>
>
> how relevant is obsolete closed mind ideology?
>
the company responsible for development of all key components sto
On 2013-10-09 08:18, Geoff Nordli wrote:
I was doing an upgrade of vboxsvc on one of my machines and I noticed
the zvolrights smf:
http://sourceforge.net/p/vboxsvc/code/HEAD/tree/usr/share/doc/vboxsvc/README-zvolrights.txt
Are people using that successfully to be able to run VirtualBox VMs
un
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
>
> how relevant is obsolete closed source technology?
how relevant is obsolete closed mind ideology?
See what happens when you put adjectives together with minimal facts?
"relevant" has different meaning depending on whether one uses them; and
Do we have anyone using the s3700 in their pools with any kind of scale?
I picked up an eval from dell using an r820 4x4650L, 576GB of RAM, and 8 dc
s3700 drives on OI151a8. Testing with filebench and the random write
personality indicates one device pushes 14k 8kb write operations/second. I
rea
Hi,
On st, 2013-10-09 at 14:57 +0200, Nikola M. wrote:
> On 09/25/13 12:09 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it is part of SFE spec files, very same as integrated in S11.1,
> > missing is only SunRay support I think. And that is irrelevant these
> > days.
> Uh, don't think for a second SunR
On 9 October 2013 14:37, Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
wrote:
>> From: Christopher Chan [mailto:christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 8:42 PM
>>
>> Er...isn't hotswap capability PART of the specs whether the drives are
>> SAS or SATA? I can do this on a cheap deskt
> From: Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
>
> If it were truly hot plug, then the OS should get a drive
> disconnected signal, and c1t1d1 should not exist anymore. As is the case
> with a USB drive or firewire.
(or hotplug capable HBA)
___
OpenIndiana-d
> From: Stefan Müller-Wilken [mailto:stefan.mueller-wil...@acando.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 3:34 AM
>
> ... so just to make sure I got that right: for the T3-1 you'd suggest to dump
> the PCIe HBA and go with the on-board SAS controller - even for production
> use? And for the DL380,
> From: Christopher Chan [mailto:christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 8:42 PM
>
> Er...isn't hotswap capability PART of the specs whether the drives are
> SAS or SATA? I can do this on a cheap desktop motherboard but you cannot
> on a server board with getting a HBA?
On 09/25/13 12:09 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
it is part of SFE spec files, very same as integrated in S11.1,
missing is only SunRay support I think. And that is irrelevant these
days.
Uh, don't think for a second SunRay is irrelevant. And support for it
should not be included.
It is in use a
Hi Stefan,
I run since 3 months a dl380e with single raid0 disks in a mirrored zfs pool -
works fine!
I had to install the cpqary3 driver for the p420i controller first.
Regards,
Marc
Am 09.10.2013 um 09:33 schrieb Stefan Müller-Wilken
:
> Hi all,
>
> ... so just to make sure I got that ri
Hi all,
... so just to make sure I got that right: for the T3-1 you'd suggest to dump
the PCIe HBA and go with the on-board SAS controller - even for production use?
And for the DL380, where this is no option, place each drive in a single drive
logical volum? And then, in both cases, build RAID
12 matches
Mail list logo
