Hi, On st, 2013-10-09 at 17:11 -0400, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Milan Jurik wrote: > > > > how relevant is obsolete closed source technology? > > > how relevant is obsolete closed mind ideology? >
the company responsible for development of all key components stopped to sell it to new customers. > See what happens when you put adjectives together with minimal facts? > "relevant" has different meaning depending on whether one uses them; and to > everyone else, depending on how many people are still using them. > Yes, there are few instalations of OI probably. How important for them pulseaudio is? > "closed source" isn't entirely accurate; there are open source > implementations of the SunRay Appliance Link Protocol (ALP): > http://sourceforge.net/p/softray/wiki/Home/ Without development for more than 3 years. > http://sourceforge.net/p/lens/home/Home/ > Without development for more than 3 years. > and I've heard about some others too, but have other things to do than prove > the point right now. > Find some different technology, which has more documentation, more attention and has future. Best regards, Milan _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss