Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 32-bit support in OpenIndiana Hipster

2016-01-23 Thread Aurélien Larcher
> We are going to follow the path which was chosen by Oracle in > userland-gate. > Basic macroses are not touched. Compilers still produce 32-bit binaries by > default. 64-bit binaries are produced when necessary and delivered in > /usr/bin > if 32-bit binaries are not present. We'd like to avoid d

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 32-bit support in OpenIndiana Hipster

2016-01-23 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Aurélien Larcher писал 23.01.2016 21:20: We are going to follow the path which was chosen by Oracle in userland-gate. Basic macroses are not touched. Compilers still produce 32-bit binaries by default. 64-bit binaries are produced when necessary and delivered in /usr/bin if 32-bit binaries are

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 32-bit support in OpenIndiana Hipster

2016-01-23 Thread Aurélien Larcher
Hello, > Why not deliver amd64 bits in /usr/bin ? If we deliver them in > /usr/bin/amd64, they are not in default PATH, > and we have to use isaexec. I don't see good reason for this. We can > deliver them in /usr/bin/amd64 and hardlinks > in /usr/bin, but I don't see benefits from doing this. >

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Looking for experienced user input on specific Machine purchase

2016-01-23 Thread Harry Putnam
Hoping a few here may have experience with this hardware and can speak from experience about installing OI and using as a home NAS. My skill level is weak but I have done something very similar on one previous occasion. (With plenty of help from this list) Am I likely to be walking into known hea

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 32-bit support in OpenIndiana Hipster

2016-01-23 Thread Jay F. Shachter
First of all, I have several 32-bit computers in production, and I would like to be able to install and run OpenIndiana on them, but I cannot demand that anyone donate his time to accommodate my wishes. I mention this only if the volunteers are curious to know whether anyone would use 32-bit OpenI