> No, if ntfs is on the first partition, you have to mount p1, not p0
And?! What have I written ...?!
I have exactly written that:
https://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2016-September/019627.html
"Well, that's clear that you could not mount p0.
[...]
But although FDISK
Hi again,
Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I feel this way of identifying a partition as rather dangerous.
After your suggestions, I have used the following command:
# ntfs-3g /dev/dsk/c4t0d0p1 /mnt
The command worked! Thank you.
Great !
Jean-Pierre
Мартин Бохниг via openindiana-discuss wrote:
https://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2016-September/019602.html
AS wrote:
ntfs /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0p0 /mtn
Well, that's clear that you could not mount p0.
In Solaris x86 p0 represents the entire disk (similar to s2 on SPARC-Solaris).
Hi Apostolos,
Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Are you sure this is ntfs formatted ? Please post the output
of :
More than sure. I formated it on Windows 7 and today I tested on another
machine running Windows.
head -c 11 [device-path] | tail -c 8
# head -c 11
https://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2016-September/019602.html
AS wrote:
> ntfs /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0p0 /mtn
Well, that's clear that you could not mount p0.
In Solaris x86 p0 represents the entire disk (similar to s2 on SPARC-Solaris).
rmformat lists devices by their all-at-once
>
> I feel this way of identifying a partition as rather dangerous.
>
After your suggestions, I have used the following command:
# ntfs-3g /dev/dsk/c4t0d0p1 /mnt
The command worked! Thank you.
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
Jean-Pierre André wrote:
Michael Kruger wrote:
On 09/25/2016 04:24 PM, Adam Števko wrote:
HI,
out of curiosity, how was the NTFS created? When I tested this last, I
was able to mount ntfs properly. However, the partition was created by
ntfs-3g tools.
Adam
I don't recall as it's been a
Self-correction regarding rmvolmgr:
> Do you see the point?
> It is not about mobile user events in the first place, but the point is {is
> it connected via USB} or not.
Obviously add to this special decision-making for optical media, ZIP drives and
Floppy disks, independently of USB or not.
>Fixed devices are controlled by /etc/vfstab, you may want
>to not mount them, or mount them either read-write or read-only.
So called "removable" devices _can_ also be mounted via vfstab.
And system-filesystem-rmvolmgr _can_ be disabled via svcadm.
And it would be trivial to enhance rmvolmgr
You are welcome, I'm glad I could help.
BTW In theory I agree myself with your proposal to have ntfs devices
automounted.
But this would also automount huge ntfs hdd's on dual-boot systems.
(Although: I think the rmvolmgr is smart enough to distinguish "mobile" devices
from fixed storage).
It
Hi Jean-Pierre,
yes, that's what I meant:
A) He came across an exFAT _probably photo/video SDXC) card or "device".
B) The same fuse software where ntfs-3g was taken and ported from also supports
exFAT.
And it was already ported by some Russian youngster to Solaris-sparc years ago,
all we
Мартин Бохниг via openindiana-discuss wrote:
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/tree/master/usr/src/cmd/rmvolmgr
Thanks
Jean-Pierre
Понедельник, 26 сентября 2016, 6:45 UTC от Jean-Pierre André
:
Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Hi Martin
Мартин Бохниг via openindiana-discuss wrote:
--->>
[OpenIndiana-discuss] exFAT fuse support needed __/__ Re[2]: ntfs-3g
https://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2016-September/019610.html
<<---
What do you mean ? I agree that if Apostolos is using an
exFAT formatted
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/tree/master/usr/src/cmd/rmvolmgr
>Понедельник, 26 сентября 2016, 6:45 UTC от Jean-Pierre André
>:
>
>Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I kust wanted to check ntfs-3g and I
Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Hello,
I kust wanted to check ntfs-3g and I downloaded and installed the packages from
http://jp-andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/openindiana-ntfs-3g.html
However, it seems that it is not working.
# rmformat -l
Looking for devices...
1.
--->>
[OpenIndiana-discuss] exFAT fuse support needed __/__ Re[2]: ntfs-3g
https://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2016-September/019610.html
<<---
>Понедельник, 26 сентября 2016, 6:34 UTC от Jean-Pierre André
>:
>
>Both are ntfs-3g-2016.2.22AR.1,
Michael Kruger wrote:
On 09/25/2016 02:09 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Hello,
I kust wanted to check ntfs-3g and I downloaded and installed the
packages from
http://jp-andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/openindiana-ntfs-3g.html
There is also a package in the hipster
Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Does this work:
ntfs-3g /dev/dsk/c4t0d0p1 /mnt
# ntfs-3g /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0p1 /mnt
ntfs_attr_pread_i: ntfs_pread failed: Invalid argument
Failed to read NTFS $Bitmap: Invalid argument
The device
Michael Kruger wrote:
On 09/25/2016 04:24 PM, Adam Števko wrote:
HI,
out of curiosity, how was the NTFS created? When I tested this last, I
was able to mount ntfs properly. However, the partition was created by
ntfs-3g tools.
Adam
I don't recall as it's been a while since I tried. It was
19 matches
Mail list logo