I have a openindiana server that is used as a windows share. Users can recover
files themselves using the previous versions feature within windows. The
snapshots used to be managed by timesliderd and when a previous versions was
listed on a directory (folder) it would list all the snapshots.
I have a production system so I should have tried this at the weekend but is it
a 3 way mirror across 7 vdevs (is that the right term), see below.
I started of the resilver yesterday, but it is have too much of a performance
penalty on of the of VMWARE windows machines. I tried to reduce the
Have you checked:
Yes
https://www.google.nl/#q=zfs+resilver+priority+openindianasafe=off
None of those told me how to stop it in the background
http://broken.net/uncategorized/zfs-performance-tuning-for-scrubs-and-resilvers/
This is where I got
echo zfs_resilver_delay/w8 | mdb -kw
echo
: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] how to stop a zfs resilver
On 05/06/2014 12:05, John McEntee wrote:
I have a production system so I should have tried this at the weekend but is
it a 3 way mirror across 7 vdevs (is that the right term), see below.
I started of the resilver yesterday, but it is have
zfs remove c1t5000CCA225C03FC0d0
This works on only inactive hot spares, cache, top-level, or log devices can
be removed
I have done a
zfs detach tank c1t5000CCA225C03FC0d0
but the pool is still trying to resilver even to a missing device ( I suppose I
could pull it out, may try that on
This is what we use in /etc/system :
set zfs:zfs_resilver_delay = 0
set zfs:zfs_scrub_delay = 0
set zfs:zfs_top_maxinflight = 128
set zfs:zfs_resilver_min_time_ms = 5000
Resilver went down from 14 days for a 2 TB disk to 7 hours.
Currently the backups overnight have a higher load that
[mailto:mich...@edition-software.de]
Sent: 11 April 2014 15:59
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, John McEntee wrote:
I have a zpool (3way mirror and striped across 21 disks), tank, that the
zfs and zpool
I have a zpool (3way mirror and striped across 21 disks), tank, that the zfs
and zpool commands differ slightly.
# zpool list tank
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
tank 19.0T 14.5T 4.51T76% 1.00x ONLINE -
# zfs list tank
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
-5461/ghbxs/
Thanks
John
-Original Message-
From: Michael Hase [mailto:mich...@edition-software.de]
Sent: 11 April 2014 15:59
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, John McEntee wrote:
I have
My best servers have 24 hot swap bays in a 4 U case (DIY build) using 3 x 8
port LSI cards. 3 drives 3 way mirror across the 3 controllers ,2 x 256GB ssd
one spinning rust, for rpool, early days of SSD and was worried about
reliability. Only 20Gb or so of the ssds is for the rpool the rest is
-update
~ Ken Mays
On Sunday, October 27, 2013 5:58 AM, John McEntee
jmcen...@stirling-dynamics.com wrote:
Trying to upgrade from verison 148 to the latest I get the following error.
WARNING: pkg(5) appears to be out of date, and should be updated before running
image-update
Trying to upgrade from verison 148 to the latest I get the following error.
WARNING: pkg(5) appears to be out of date, and should be updated before
running image-update. Please update pkg(5) using 'pfexec pkg install
pkg:/package/pkg' and then retry the image-update.
But if I update pkg from
quickly to another DC until it gets one of the correct
ones. Very ugly but it has the desired effect and has solve my problems.
John
-Original Message-
From: John McEntee [mailto:jmcen...@stirling-dynamics.com]
Sent: 10 September 2013 10:23
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re
Check your
/var/svc/log/system-idmap:default.log
I had the problem where restarting the idmap service would work. Turns out my
OI box could not find out what site it was at so would use any, but couldn't
talk to the remote ones fast even giving your symptom.
John
-Original Message-
You AD server is probably being slow, so request threads calling it all get
stuck.
Um, you may be right, we have many sites (correctly setup in site and
services), 2 DCs at head office with the openindiana fileserver, but the
thread creation refused - 40 threads currently active occurs only
I use Intel's X520-DA2 fine on OI 148 with included driver. Haven't tested
151a yet.
-Original Message-
From: Rich [mailto:rerc...@acm.jhu.edu]
Sent: 20 August 2012 16:57
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 10GigE adapters for OI151a or later
Intel's
I have an update on my running CIFS and windows saga.
Getting samba installed and joined to the domain is a challenge and a half,
and is still not authenticating (trying on a test server).
What I have done is stop using a dns alias to connect to the OpenIndiana
server. So whereas before I was
On my home network I observed that when I turned a Windows XP host off a
Windows 7 host declared that it lost access to the Samba service hosted from
a Solaris 10 system. It was then able to reconnect to the Samba service on
that Solaris 10 system even though the Windows XP host remained turned
The first thing to verify is your network and network interface. Run
continuous traffic and see if there are any hickups.
You can use /usr/sbin/ping for testing with larger packets.
Also check the log files under /var/adm and /var/log. Also check output
of 'fmadm -ev' and 'fmadm faulty'.
I had similar issues before I enabled TLER, and disabled the head parking
on my WD Green drives. A quick Google shows some evidence of similar
features on the 3TB Hitachis.
I chose Hitachi because I didn't think they had this feature. I would have
thought ZFS would have reported errors and
I think BTRFS on openindiana would be a distraction and not worth the effort
at this point in time.
At home I and trialling ZFS on linux (need linux for mythtv) and it works
well.
I have not tried BTRFS but there a few things I really like about ZFS and
openindiana.
1.) The kernel cifs server
not to create zfs
snapshots by own crontab entry?
Best regards,
Milan
On 14.03.2012 12:38, John McEntee wrote:
I have a problem trying to keep a second fileserver in sync with the
primary one.
I have a script (auto-replicate) that I have slightly altered that
basically
checks the latest
Hoping to save any more googling and pawing thru specs etc by letting
someone that knows just name motherboards that allow 24 gb max ram and
have option for ECC memory too.
I've looked at quite a few asus boards which seem to have ECC option
more or less by default (unlike most others). But
The thread I saw on opensolaris is here
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=139077tstart=0
But the description is below.
I can't speak to why you don't see this problem with build 134, but I
believe it's covered by
7012679 Configurable bypass for vcnumber zero
which is fixed in
I saw a comment it was fixed in Opensolaris snv_161 (I think) but you can't
get that.
It seems to work for me in OI 148, but I haven't tested it extensively yet,
but opening 2 windows on two different aliases work.
John
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Leafty
the WD drives have a what WD call TLER, that is a setting that defines
how long the drive trys to read a bad sector before giving up at
returning an error. The raid edition does this almost instantly and the
RAID hardware / ZFS can then decide what to do. The non RAID edition
retries for a
-Original Message-
From: Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
Sent: 28 March 2011 16:57
How would this affect those of us so confused by variants of BSD/SysVR4,
that we need to check uname to remember the correct syntax for this
particular box?
Now, who in their right mind would suggest
I am currently using opensolaris snv_134 have just bought some 3 TB disks to
upgrade a 8 disk mirror of 2 TB disks. I though this should just work as
opensolaris can use EFI partiton tables, but giving zfs the whole
unformatted disk results in the following partition table and pool size.
amd64
-Original Message-
From: Toomas Soome [mailto:toomas.so...@mls.ee]
Sent: 22 March 2011 12:27
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 3TB disks for tank zpool? Can only use 2
TB.
what does isainfo -k report?
On 22.03.2011, at 14:24, John McEntee
I have not heard that any Solaris* can use disk/partition in zpool,
larger then 2TB. Maybe you can try partitioning disk with 2+1TB
I can find various comments about 3TB boot disks are not going to work and
hints that 3TB data disk should be fine. I could not find any posts saying
3TB don't
30 matches
Mail list logo
