[OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread Reginald Beardsley
How about something along the lines of the following: List active developers on the website for OI along w/ what they are working on. If you want to fund that person's work, you sign up to provide a certain amount which is divided into equal allotments for each month remaining in the calendar y

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread Jonathan Adams
Can I ask that a percentage of the income, given to specific people, goes into a common pot, either to help support Illumos development directly, or to pay for tickets/marketing for conventions or likewise. just my 2c. Jon On 29 January 2013 15:32, Reginald Beardsley wrote: > How about somethin

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread James Relph
> How about something along the lines of the following: > > List active developers on the website for OI along w/ what they are working > on. > > If you want to fund that person's work, you sign up to provide a certain > amount which is divided into equal allotments for each month remaining in

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread Reginald Beardsley
--- On Tue, 1/29/13, James Relph wrote: > > That sounds a pretty reasonable approach, although there's 2 > things I'd add: > >     -    The possibility to > add bounties for requested features. >     -    As Jonathan mentions > - having a common pot (eg. 20% of donations go to > that).  Not j

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread Udo Grabowski (IMK)
On 29/01/2013 17:36, Reginald Beardsley wrote: I'd like to suggest as a social convention that the initial "license fee" be 10% of system cost UAHHH ! Then we should have stayed at Oracle.. Really, if you solve a problem for one system, why should someone pay for the other 99 identical s

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread James Relph
> I'd like to suggest as a social convention that the initial "license fee" be > 10% of system cost and "support fee" after the first year at 5%. Purely > voluntary the way tipping service staff in restaurants used to be. No > distinction between used or new equipment. So if you spin up an old

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread Reginald Beardsley
--- On Tue, 1/29/13, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: > From: Udo Grabowski (IMK) > Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings > To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" > Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 10:50 AM > On 29/01/2013 17:36, Reginald >

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread dormitionsk...@hotmail.com
I don't mean to discourage this dialog, but all of this was discussed two or three - maybe four - months ago on the dev mailing list. You might want to go back and look at the archives at the threads about Alasdair's resignation - which basically boiled down to "none of the OI developers want

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread Udo Grabowski (IMK)
On 01/29/13 06:47 PM, Reginald Beardsley wrote: --- On Tue, 1/29/13, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: From: Udo Grabowski (IMK) Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 10:50 AM On 29/01/

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Developer funding model musings

2013-01-29 Thread James Relph
> I, personally, appreciate their efforts very much. I just think that funding > individual developers is probably the best we can reasonably hope for at this > time. It's not as complete of a solution as paying one or more people to > work on OI full time; but at least it would be a step in t