On 2013-01-28 19:54, Reginald Beardsley wrote:
My understanding is that it is not possible to boot from an EFI labeled disk.
Has that changed? In a way it's moot as I just got the UPS tracking info for
3x2 TB disks. But the info might help someone else.
The Oracle docs I was pointed to were
--- On Tue, 1/29/13, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
In my Wiki post you've read, one of the reasons to do manual
installs
(copy of files from Live media) was explicitly the desire to
co-exist
OI with an older rpool, i.e. to facilitate migration. I have
one such
system where SXCE-117
On 01/29/13 06:56, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-01-28 19:54, Reginald Beardsley wrote:
My understanding is that it is not possible to boot from an EFI labeled disk.
Has that changed? In a way it's moot as I just got the UPS tracking info for
3x2 TB disks. But the info might help someone else.
On 01/26/13 09:44, Jan Owoc wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Reginald Beardsleypulask...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm trying to install on a 3 TB HGST disk which reports 512 byte sectors using
the text installer. The system is an HP N40L and is intended to be a ZFS based
NFS server for a
--- On Mon, 1/28/13, Dave Miner dmi...@opensolaris.org wrote:
From: Dave Miner dmi...@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI 151_a7 install on 4k sector disk
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Date: Monday, January 28, 2013, 9:47 AM
On 01/26/13 09:44, Jan Owoc wrote
I'm trying to install on a 3 TB HGST disk which reports 512 byte sectors using
the text installer. The system is an HP N40L and is intended to be a ZFS based
NFS server for a Solaris 10 workstation.
format(1m) correctly sees the size of the disk and I'm able to create a 128 GB
slice for a root
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Reginald Beardsley pulask...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm trying to install on a 3 TB HGST disk which reports 512 byte sectors
using the text installer. The system is an HP N40L and is intended to be a
ZFS based NFS server for a Solaris 10 workstation.
format(1m)
zpool
command that sets ashift=12.
Have Fun!
Reg
--- On Sat, 1/26/13, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI 151_a7 install on 4k sector disk
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Date: Saturday
On 2013-01-26 17:29, Reginald Beardsley wrote:
Again, in the above documentation it says that the label on
the root
disk *must* be SMI, and therefore cannot be EFI. Again, work
may have
been done since Solaris 10, but I'm not aware of
OI-specific
documentation of this problem.
FWIW, I read
On 2013-01-26 19:38, Jim Klimov wrote:
FWIW, I read that EFI/GPT labels have a compatibility mode to SMI/MBR
tables, allowing to present (part of) the lower 2Tb as a legacy MBR,
and this was specifically a mode to allow booting older Windows and
such from newer huge disks.
Ok, I refreshed my
-discuss] OI 151_a7 install on 4k sector disk
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Date: Saturday, January 26, 2013, 12:38 PM
On 2013-01-26 17:29, Reginald
Beardsley wrote:
Again, in the above documentation it says that the
label on
the root
disk *must* be SMI, and therefore cannot
On 01/26/2013 09:54 PM, Reginald Beardsley wrote:
Having got the 3 TB disk working in the Solaris 10 system where it belongs, I
think I'll pass on doing battle w/ booting from disks 2 TB.
I've got a zpool on a 3 TB USB disk actually functioning w/ 151_a7 which is a
big improvement, but it
On 2013-01-26 22:17, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Are you going to be using ZFS on those? If so, how does the ashift of a
zpool created with them look like?
# zdb poolname | grep ashift
If it prints ashift: 12, then you are good, zpool picked up the
correct settings.
Well, to be pedantic, I'd add
Doesn't work w/ an initial offset of 256 either. I suspect that it's something
to do w/ it being an USB disk. It's been an EFI label in both instances. I
tried offsets from 34 to ~64 w/o any change in behavior.
BTW what's the deal w/ 34? If you try to set anything smaller it's disallowed,
On 2013-01-26 22:57, Reginald Beardsley wrote:
BTW what's the deal w/ 34? If you try to set anything smaller it's disallowed,
though I did manage somehow to get it set to 6. There is a *lot* of
inconsistency in the rules in the various parts of the format(1m) utility.
IIRC, 33 sectors was
15 matches
Mail list logo
