to
verify this before September.
Best regards.
Ben
- Mail original -
De: Jonathan Adams t12nsloo...@gmail.com
À: Discussion list for OpenIndiana openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 30 Juillet 2015 17:09:47
Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance
I know it's
I know it's a little off-topic, but have you thought of creating a zpool on
the USB stick and seeing how that goes?
ZFS on Linux works well for removable media, assuming you can sudo zpool
import
Jon
PS. I generally end up dd'ing with a block size of 4M to get maximum
throughput.
On 30 July
benta...@chez.com wrote:
Hi Jean-Pierre,
I was using 2012.1.15AR.8 from SFE, with no specific option for mount command :
# ntfs-3g -o uid=101 /dev/dsk/c2t0d0p1 /mnt
Since then I switched to the last version available on your website
(2015.3.14AR.1), and redid the test, still using the same
Jean-Pierre André wrote:
Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Hi,
[...]
using NTFS-3g
$ dd if=FreeDOS-1.1-memstick-2-2048M.img
of=/mnt/FreeDOS-1.1-memstick-2-2048M.img
3948544+0 records in
3948544+0 records out
2021654528 bytes (2.0 GB) copied, 15867.8 s, 127 kB/s
After reformating to UFS
$ dd
September.
Ben
- Mail original -
De: Jean-Pierre André jean-pierre.an...@wanadoo.fr
À: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Envoyé: Mardi 28 Juillet 2015 20:16:25
Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance
Jean-Pierre André wrote:
Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Hi,
[...]
using NTFS
Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Hi,
There is indeed a much newer version of ntfs-3g on Jean-Pierre André's website:
2015.3.14AR.1.
He posted very good results earlier this year.
Having these in oi-userland is on the TODO list and would be great.
The ntfs-3g library is already part of Hipster, only
:44
Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance
Thanks for the FAT trick.
I don't remember when the disk used to be NTFS, 1 or 2 years ago. I had to
reformat it for compatibility issues with shiny hardware I don't manage.
I'll try to reformat it to NTFS and see how it goes.
Best regards
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 16:24:44
Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance
Thanks for the FAT trick.
I don't remember when the disk used to be NTFS, 1 or 2 years ago. I had to
reformat it for compatibility issues with shiny hardware I don't
Hi,
I always found the performance of USB devices connected to OI behind other OS.
Is it related to the implementation or is it just me (oi159a) ?
For example, same drive transfer (one big file) is :
- 8MB/s on OI
- 45MB/s on Linux/Windows
Ben
___
I redid the test, it is more around 30-35 MB/s on other OS's actually.
- Mail original -
De: benta...@chez.com
À: Discussion list for OpenIndiana openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 15:56:33
Objet: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance
Hi,
I always found
aurelien.larc...@gmail.com
À: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 16:08:25
Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance
I guess it depends which filesystem you are using, but for FAT yes definitely.
Maybe just a matter of block size in this case.
Also make sure
...@chez.com a écrit :
I redid the test, it is more around 30-35 MB/s on other OS's actually.
- Mail original -
De: benta...@chez.com
À: Discussion list for OpenIndiana openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 15:56:33
Objet: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2
12 matches
Mail list logo
