Hello,
I have an external USB disk. The disk is pre-formatted with NTFSbut I would
like to use it to back up things from hard disks.An ideal solution would be to
create two partitions on thisdisks and have an NTFS partition and a second
partition whereI can create a zpool and then a zfs. I have
Hi,
"Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss"
írta 2017-09-07 19:58-kor:
> Hello,
> I have an external USB disk. The disk is pre-formatted with NTFSbut I would
> like to use it to back up things from hard disks.An ideal solution would be
> to create two partitions on thisdisks and have a
>Ok, but what is the problem?
>What is the output and stderr of your zpool create cXtYdZp2 command?
>Does it gives any error?
After more searching I concluded that the command should be
# zpool create -f utank c13t0d0s2
The logical Node was /dev/rdsk/c13t0d0p0and format --> partition --> print
On 09/07/17 16:50, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
>
>> Ok, but what is the problem?
>> What is the output and stderr of your zpool create cXtYdZp2 command?
>> Does it gives any error?
>
> After more searching I concluded that the command should be
> # zpool create -f utank c1
>p2 is, by convention, "whole disk" when using old-style partitioning.
>If you're using that and you've partitioned the disk, I think you've
>trashed your NTFS partition or (worse) you have an overlap.
>
>Are you sure? What exactly does "format" say about the partition map?
This is what fdisk s
On 08/09/2017 14:44, James Carlson via openindiana-discuss wrote:
On 09/07/17 16:50, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Ok, but what is the problem?
What is the output and stderr of your zpool create cXtYdZp2 command?
Does it gives any error?
After more searching I concluded th
On 09/08/17 10:45, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
> On x86, p0 is the whole disk, and p1-4 are the 4 primary FDISK partitions.
I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
thinking of s2, not p2.
--
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W
___
>I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
>thinking of s2, not p2.
So what I did what correct, right? I have mounted both partitions and the
dataare there and I can read and write.
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
_
On 08/09/2017 17:33, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
thinking of s2, not p2.
So what I did what correct, right? I have mounted both partitions and the
dataare there and I can read and write.
No. Your boot
Hi,
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" írta 2017-09-08 17:39-kor:
> On 08/09/2017 17:33, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
> >>I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
> >>thinking of s2, not p2.
> >
> >So what I did what correct, right? I have mounted both partiti
On 08/09/2017 23:41, PÁSZTOR György wrote:
Hi,
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" írta 2017-09-08 17:39-kor:
On 08/09/2017 17:33, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
thinking of s2, not p2.
So what I did what correct, ri
Hi,
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" írta 2017-09-09 13:12-kor:
> No, s2 has been actively configured to be used as a zpool slice,
Yepp. That is the normal behaviour.
> zfs tools don't do that. Therefore, the next one that will touch
I think, You are wrong. ZFS does that. At least according to docs.
> s
On 09/09/2017 15:45, PÁSZTOR György wrote:
Hi,
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" írta 2017-09-09 13:12-kor:
No, s2 has been actively configured to be used as a zpool slice,
Yepp. That is the normal behaviour.
No, it's not. The normal behaviour is using either s0 or the
whole disk (which, again, is set
In message <59b40014.4010...@kit.edu>, "Udo Grabowski (IMK)" writes:
>And that's the problem. Always expect the unexpected. Some day some
>tool or idiot will touch that, and your nice s2 pool is gone. Use the
>things as they are intended to be used, not just in any way you like
>because it happens
14 matches
Mail list logo
