In message <59b40014.4010...@kit.edu>, "Udo Grabowski (IMK)" writes:
>And that's the problem. Always expect the unexpected. Some day some
>tool or idiot will touch that, and your nice s2 pool is gone. Use the
>things as they are intended to be used, not just in any way you like
>because it happens
On 09/09/2017 15:45, PÁSZTOR György wrote:
Hi,
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" írta 2017-09-09 13:12-kor:
No, s2 has been actively configured to be used as a zpool slice,
Yepp. That is the normal behaviour.
No, it's not. The normal behaviour is using either s0 or the
whole disk (which, again, is set
Hi,
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" írta 2017-09-09 13:12-kor:
> No, s2 has been actively configured to be used as a zpool slice,
Yepp. That is the normal behaviour.
> zfs tools don't do that. Therefore, the next one that will touch
I think, You are wrong. ZFS does that. At least according to docs.
> s
On 08/09/2017 23:41, PÁSZTOR György wrote:
Hi,
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" írta 2017-09-08 17:39-kor:
On 08/09/2017 17:33, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
thinking of s2, not p2.
So what I did what correct, ri
Hi,
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" írta 2017-09-08 17:39-kor:
> On 08/09/2017 17:33, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
> >>I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
> >>thinking of s2, not p2.
> >
> >So what I did what correct, right? I have mounted both partiti
On 08/09/2017 17:33, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
thinking of s2, not p2.
So what I did what correct, right? I have mounted both partitions and the
dataare there and I can read and write.
No. Your boot
>I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
>thinking of s2, not p2.
So what I did what correct, right? I have mounted both partitions and the
dataare there and I can read and write.
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
_
On 09/08/17 10:45, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
> On x86, p0 is the whole disk, and p1-4 are the 4 primary FDISK partitions.
I should mind my p's and s's. Thanks, Andrew; you're right. I was
thinking of s2, not p2.
--
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W
___
On 08/09/2017 14:44, James Carlson via openindiana-discuss wrote:
On 09/07/17 16:50, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Ok, but what is the problem?
What is the output and stderr of your zpool create cXtYdZp2 command?
Does it gives any error?
After more searching I concluded th
>p2 is, by convention, "whole disk" when using old-style partitioning.
>If you're using that and you've partitioned the disk, I think you've
>trashed your NTFS partition or (worse) you have an overlap.
>
>Are you sure? What exactly does "format" say about the partition map?
This is what fdisk s
On 09/07/17 16:50, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
>
>> Ok, but what is the problem?
>> What is the output and stderr of your zpool create cXtYdZp2 command?
>> Does it gives any error?
>
> After more searching I concluded that the command should be
> # zpool create -f utank c1
>Ok, but what is the problem?
>What is the output and stderr of your zpool create cXtYdZp2 command?
>Does it gives any error?
After more searching I concluded that the command should be
# zpool create -f utank c13t0d0s2
The logical Node was /dev/rdsk/c13t0d0p0and format --> partition --> print
Hi,
"Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss"
írta 2017-09-07 19:58-kor:
> Hello,
> I have an external USB disk. The disk is pre-formatted with NTFSbut I would
> like to use it to back up things from hard disks.An ideal solution would be
> to create two partitions on thisdisks and have a
Hello,
I have an external USB disk. The disk is pre-formatted with NTFSbut I would
like to use it to back up things from hard disks.An ideal solution would be to
create two partitions on thisdisks and have an NTFS partition and a second
partition whereI can create a zpool and then a zfs. I have
14 matches
Mail list logo