James Carlson carls...@workingcode.com writes:
On 1/3/2015 7:32 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Server OS: OI 115_a9 client OS: Gentoo linux (up to date)
On client: I recently decided I'd like to write rsnapshot (using
rsync) backups to an nfs mounted zfs share on OI nfs server.
The first trial
Aside from ditching the gui desktop altogether; does anyone know if
there is some way to disable all keyboard shortcuts provided by the
gui?
Many cannot be removed using Settings/keyboard shortcuts.
Even some I set long ago still work after removing them from that gui
keyboars sc tool.
Michael Schuster michaelspriv...@gmail.com writes:
I'd start with xmodmap (and xev to find out what the keys are doing).
Why would I start there if I want to know if there is some way to
disable and keyboard shortcuts set by the gui?
Do you know if there is?
Is there some similarly all incompassing command to revert:
/bin/chmod -R A=everyone@:full_set:fd:allow /some-dir
back to a more default chmod 755 on directories and 644 on type -f files?
(and no acls set)
I mean short of using `find' in comination with chmod.
Doug Hughes d...@will.to writes:
Well, it's not the exactly same, but you could do
chmod -R go-w .
Has no effect on all the thousands of type -f files
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us writes:
It order to escape this, you can install Perl from source code
compiled with GCC. Expect it to be an adventure.
hehe... thanks
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
Can any cpan user tell me if there are things I can do so the cpan
shell behaves more like a modern bash shell?... so that walking back
thru history doesn't just insert a bunch of control char.
Modern bash is very editable, and history wise, yet cpan is like using
the ancient borne `sh'
It makes
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
Following update of an hipster install running as Vbox guest on an OI
(151_9) installation, rebooted to new BE following upgarde, But it
does not bring up X as in the past, so logging into my user at console
and attempting to startx from there I get
Alexander Pyhalov a...@rsu.ru writes:
You have to update virtualbox drivers (guest additions). Drivers from
4.3.22 work for me.
---
System Administrator of Southern Federal University Computer Center
Thanks. I'll try that now.
___
Following update of an hipster install running as Vbox guest on an OI
(151_9) installation, rebooted to new BE following upgarde, But it
does not bring up X as in the past, so logging into my user at console
and attempting to startx from there I get this error:
,
| xauth: creating new
I own 1 hp 8600 running OI 151_09
I'd like to have a twin and shopping on ebay.
My current xw8600 came from ebay with 2x Xeon and 32 GB ram
I'm not finding a ready made twin but see a few 2x Xeon xw8600's .
What I don't feel confident about is how to ramp up the RAM.
This particular
John D Groenveld jdg...@elvis.arl.psu.edu writes:
In message 54e6e89a.5090...@2e-systems.com, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems
Ad
ministrator] writes:
On 02/20/15 08:36 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/31.4.0esr/contrib/solaris_pkgadd
/firefox-31.4.0esr.en
Running 151_9
I got a notification that a zpool was nearing the full mark.
zfs `list -r p0' showed 825 gb in use and 89 gb left.
After checking it out I deleted about 260gb from one of zfs fs on
`p0'.
I have yet to see any change in what zfs list -r `p0' shows. still
showing 825gb in use and
On OS's like OI 151_a9, when the `time-slider' app from
menu System/administration/time-slider is in working order, I'm
curious why the percentage allowed for snapshots is so high?
On my setup, `the time-slider manager' allows 70-90 % of disk space to
be set for the storage of snapshots... above
Alexander Pyhalov a...@rsu.ru writes:
That seems like an awfully high percentage... even at the lowest
setting of 70%.
It seems you misunderstand this setting. It says clean up snapshots
when 70% of filesystem space is used,
Gack! Yes I did... thanks for clearing it up.
Running OI a9 on HP xw8600
Following a hard shutdown from power outage; attempted boots produced
an error message indicating a problem with the onboard battery and
that the date was way off.
On booting to bios I discovered the date was on zeros all around.
AFter resetting the date to its (then
Lou Picciano loupicci...@comcast.net writes:
As a start: Once in grub, edit boot line to 'text mode' and
verbose. This will get you a bit down the road toward diagnosis.
Lou Picciano
I don't seem to be getting far trying above. Probably due to not
really understanding what you mean.
On
Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru writes:
8 августа 2015 г. 10:03:34 CEST, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com пишет:
Running OI a9 on HP xw8600
Following a hard shutdown from power outage; attempted boots produced
an error message indicating a problem with the onboard battery and
that the date was way
James Carlson carls...@workingcode.com writes:
On 8/8/2015 6:02 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Top image is initial screen; I pressed `e' on last item
That brought bottom image up where I pressed `e' and added
textmode,verbose on each line where you see a green dot. (in rotation)
The flags make
James Carlson carls...@workingcode.com writes:
On 8/8/2015 6:56 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
I added this to the end of kernel line:
[...]spc-m textmode,verbose
Then pressed enter, then pressed b
The boot attempt ended exactly as I've described. That is,
It goes to the boot progress
Jason Matthews ja...@broken.net writes:
if you think the cmos battery is bad then the sata config might have
reverted to legacy mode or compatibility mode from ahci (or vice
versa). this might account seeing grub but not file systems. this
needs to be addressed before proceeding.
First,
Lou Picciano loupicci...@comcast.net writes:
Harry,
First, apologies. I should have provided you that explicit GRUB boot
line, then stuck with you! No matter, you're further along now...
I'm gonna use the Occam's Razor approach, and bet that you've blasted
your SATA settings - and that
Gary Mills writes:
>>
>> Cutting to chase: Monitor suddenly will not produce a computer screen
>> from any host. All parts; hosts, kvm, monitor and keyboard have been in
>> use in this arrangement for same period of time.
>
> Try a hard reset on the monitor, meaning that
Not particularly and OI question but that is where I need this
technique to work. I'm hoping some of you old shell hands will
see the problem.
I hope not to be exibiting true ignorance... but here I go.
I keep messing with one forumlation of find cnmd that seems like it
aught to work... What
v...@bb-c.de (Volker A. Brandt) writes:
> Hi Harry!
>
>
>> find scripts/perl/ -cnewer NewerThan -and ! -cnewer ButNotNewerThan
>
> Stupid question: Which find are you using? The -cnewer construct
gnu find
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
Thanks for the good input... yes I see it is `-newer' I was
after... not -cnewer.
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Hoping a few here may have experience with this hardware and can speak
from experience about installing OI and using as a home NAS.
My skill level is weak but I have done something very similar on one
previous occasion. (With plenty of help from this list)
Am I likely to be walking into known
Can anyone advise me about how to acquire bios version on OI running
on HP xw8600 with 2x xeon hardware?
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> writes:
> Am 16.02.16 um 05:53 schrieb Harry Putnam:
>> Can anyone advise me about how to acquire bios version on OI running
>> on HP xw8600 with 2x xeon hardware?
>>
>>
>>
> Just issue smbios on the termi
Aurélien Larcher writes:
harry wrote:
>> I used this iso: oi-hipster-gui-20160421.iso
>> Am I wasting my time with the mentioned iso... is there a more recent
>> one?
>
> Yes testing ISOs have been announced
>
I am so far from knowledgable about the differences between the
various Solaris branches is the only reason for asking this question.
I'd like to hear a bit about the pro's of hipster as compared to
Solaris 11.3. Maybe a few pointer showing where the real differences
are and what they mean.
"Hetrick, Joseph P" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would be very aware of the issues with zfs send/recv I have posted
> here and to illumos discuss before performing either activity. If you
> have an OI 151aN series install I would be cautious thinking you can
> zfs
Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> writes:
> When I try the same from hipster I get:
>
> sudo mount -F nfs d1:/pub /nfs/d1-pub
>
> nfs mount: d1:/pub: No such file or directory
Please disregard my flayling . . I was trying to mount a symlink to a
directory.
d1:/pub
I've been attempting to mount an nfs share from a linux host on a vbox
install of hipster (from the recent new *.iso's posted).
First I tested to make sure the share was being exported by mounting
the share from another linux host as client. I was able to mount it
with no problems.
When I try
Running oi build 151_9 (not hipster)
Hardware:
HP xw8600 workstation with 2x XEON 5460 3.00ghz cpus and 32 GB ram.
My setup is very small beer compared to many on this list. I only
have a few zfs FS carrying data on a mirrored pair of disks that
contains rpool. Maybe about 125 GB
I have
Jerry Kemp writes:
> Sorry, please disregard reply.
>
> I didn't see that the OP had resolved his issue a dozen or so post later.
>
Your post was still helpful since I did not think to use the showmount
command you suggested... thanks
Just installed hipster in vbox vm on a Solaris (openindiana) host.
I used this iso: oi-hipster-gui-20160421.iso
It's been disappointing.
Seems that updating to latest image is not possible:
A command like `pkg image-update -v'
Just sets and never returns or shows any activity. But it is
I've been running openindiana on an HP xw8600 for some time. It has
the most recent (2012) BIOS version published (most recent far as I
know, after googling a bit). (If this is wrong please let me know)
NOTE: BIOS Configuration: Hewlett-Packard 786F5 v01.46 09/20/2012
With Virtualbox, since
"the outsider" writes:
> Does useradd fail at creating the user? Or is the user directory not
> created?
>
> Otherwise:
> mkdir -p /home/{username}
> useradd -G {staff} {username}
>
> passwd { username}
>
> chown -R {username} : { staff} /home/{username}
>
Seems to
Fiddling around with a new install from OI-hipster-gui-20161030.iso, I
don't see a way to get a screen resolution higher than 1024x768.
(The install is oih as guest in virtualbox)
The default Mate terminal takes half or more of 1024x768
I found the screen settings in Mate config tool but see no
The useradd tool seem not to be able to add users when a home dir is
stipulated. I know there has been a bug filed some time back.
Am I likely to end in a mess if I just edit /etc/passwd/group to add a
user?
Are there other things to edit beyond the two mentioned above?
"Alex Smith (K4RNT)" writes:
> Hello there,
>
> http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c01316837
Egad!
> My research points me to the BIOS setup screen (F10 on boot), choosing
> Security, OS Security, Intel Virtualization instructions.
> My only
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" writes:
[...]
> +1 for keeping and off by default - this is, e.g., needed
> where you login against a Windows central IDM infrastructure.
I don't have any kind of vote here... however, have had man problems
with the current default. My other lan
Thank you both for the techniques.
I think it used to take a few more steps to make it possible to ssh to
root. Last time I did that it involved editing a pam file
/etc/user_attr. Maybe more but that was a good while ago.
I see its been made simpler. Or maybe I was all wet back then too.
Setup: running oi-151_9 on:
Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz - 32 GB ram
I'm about to try installing hipster from the 161030 gui iso on the
above hardware that has been running build 151_9 for something like 2
yrs maybe more.
I've had some good helpful posts on how to get this
Is there a way to import zpools that I forgot to export before shutdown
and fresh install.
Or will it be best to mount one of the mirrored discs from old install
somewhere and just rsync stuff to new zfs fs.
No need in this case of worry about snapshots and such plus there is
not much data
This is my first actual usage of send/receive. I see the examples
given here:
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18752_01/html/819-5461/gbchx.html#gbinw
host1# zfs send tank/dana@snap1 | ssh host2 zfs recv newtank/dana
Note the `#' sign .. so root is sending, however in all of my installs,
Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> writes:
> I think what Timothy C has in mind is dropping mbuffer/tamp and using
> ssh for the whole thing
>
> zfs send p/fs@now | ssh RECV_HOST zfs recv p/fs
OOps that should have read ...
I think what G
Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>> Geoff Nordli <geo...@gnaa.net> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >
>> > Just a thought here, you may w
James Carlson via openindiana-discuss
<openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> writes:
> On 03/27/17 04:40, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> My rendition:
>>
>> zfs send p0/vb/vm@170326_1 |tamp|mbuffer -s 128k -m1000m -0
>> recv-host:31337 | mbuffer -s 128k -m 1999m -I 31337
Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> writes:
> I tried this at ~/.ssh/config on source host. The host named
> in the config is the destination host that is running the rsync cmd.
>
> Host g1 <= name of linux host
> HostName g1.local.lan <=same linux host
>
Geoff Nordli <geo...@gnaa.net> writes:
> On 2017-03-27 07:44 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Geoff Nordli <geo...@gnaa.net> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Just a thought here, you may want to try a different ssh cipher. Give
>>> arcfour a try and se
Aurélien Larcher <aurelien.larc...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>> [Note: comments below NOT to be seen as load complaining]
>>
>> Running pkg update I've noticed that is seems really slow.
Can anyone offer a list of pkgs one would need in order to be able to
compile the odd gnu type packge from source
I have installed gcc-5 and automake and I see make is already
onboard.
I haven't attempted any builds as yet but I hoped someone would know
off the top of there head what packages
I continue to have a problem understanding the output of zfs list.
I've googled up a couple of what seem to be thorough explainations but
somehow am still not getting it.
Or maybe this is just what it looks like, that is, a lot of space gone
to parity striping.
NameUSEDAVAIL REFER
Trying to learn how to use mbuffer and tamp to do zfs send/receive
rather than ssh which is pretty slow even on my home gigabit lan at
home where there is very little traffic.
So far using ready made examples from posters on this group or a few I
found online I've constantly run into `connection
Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>
>> On the vm, I've created discs like so:
>>
>> 2 @ 96G
>> 2 @ 116G
>> 2 @ 216G
>>
>> These have just over 2x v
jason matthews <ja...@broken.net> writes:
> On 3/24/17 3:43 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I continue to have a problem understanding the output of zfs list.
>
> You may want zpool list, depending on what you trying to get. Let's
> see what you have done. please show us:
Nikola M <minik...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 03/22/17 04:43 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I'm working on updating a host from 151_9 to latest hipster.
>
> If you do have backups, try using hipster-2015 as the intermediary
> step to update old /dev installs and then from that
Alexander Pyhalov <a...@rsu.ru> writes:
> On 22.03.2017 21:40, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Nikola M <minik...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> The current rpool was created about a 1.5 mnths ago (Using the 161030
>> iso) Installation is updated as of today.
>>
Alexander Pyhalov <a...@rsu.ru> writes:
> On 03/23/17 03:37 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I was hoping to keep it kind of simple and just try to mirror rpool
>> with a pair of smallish discs. So rpool will just be Siamese twins.
>>
>
> If you do a clean install
Nikola M <minik...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 03/23/17 01:37 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I was hoping to keep it kind of simple and just try to mirror rpool
>> with a pair of smallish discs. So rpool will just be Siamese twins.
>>
>> Since the discs are 160 GB whic
Nikola M <minik...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 03/22/17 07:40 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> So, I've ordered 2 new 160 gb sata wd diskcs ($16 per disc) to avoid
>> possible problems with boot loader mayhem using my current discs. And
>> also since I was warned off using
Nikola M writes:
> On 03/22/17 02:21 PM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
>> Is there a way to migrate a sliced (mirrored) rpool on disks with
>> msdos partition table to gpt partioned disks (EFI lable)
>> with loader?
>
> Yes, you fully reformat one drive and do fresh install on it,
Jason Matthews writes:
>>
>
> Re busy
> What about loop back mounts?
> Any shares of any type?
> Anything like that?
>
> Re failed service
> The local fs error maybe because the system is trying to mount a fs on
> top of a non-empty directory or equivalently two file
Geoff Nordli writes:
> Just a thought here, you may want to try a different ssh cipher. Give
> arcfour a try and see if that is fast enough for you.
>
> Geoff
I made an attempt to see about the various speeds available
with different Ciphers were like
I didn't use any solaris
Geoff Nordli writes:
[...]
>
> Just a thought here, you may want to try a different ssh cipher. Give
> arcfour a try and see if that is fast enough for you.
>
Can that be done on ssh command line or must be done in ssh_config?
___
Geoff Nordli writes:
[...]
>> Ok now back to the troublesome snapshot: In the console shell again
>> zfs destroy just plain will not remove this snapshot and hence the fs
>> itself. zfs message
>> ontinues to say the snapshot is busy.
>>
>> Surely there is someway to get this
jason matthews writes:
Sorry that I slaughtered your nifty commands so bad. I haven't been
able to get copy paste working on the vm that is the target and so
have been torturing things with my poor typing.
This time I scpped your message across to both hosts so no bunky
Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> writes:
> As you see the default Cipher was barely a minute faster than
> the arcfour over 28.7 GB of data.
>
> Absolutely NOT a diffinative test in any way but should at least show
> that on this network arcfour is likely to be no faste
Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> writes:
> As you see the default Cipher was barely a minute faster than
> the arcfour over 28.7 GB of data.
>
> Absolutely NOT a diffinative test in any way but should at least show
> that on this network arcfour is likely to be no faste
[Test conducted 170330]
An attempt to measure the difference using mbuffer/tamp compared
to hipsters latest version of ssh:
pkg list|grep ssh
service/network/ssh 7.2.0.2-2017.0.0.4
=
Send HOST: A vbox vm running hipster on a windows
Jonathan Adams writes:
> Do you have any info on just how much of the time difference is just down
> to the SSH header overhead?
>
> Do you know how long this takes in comparison to starting an rsyncd server
> and sending/receiving via rsync with compression on?
No to
[Note: comments below NOT to be seen as load complaining]
Running pkg update I've noticed that is seems really slow. Maybe a
local network mess I've made? or is the repo pretty slow?
During pkg update (last was Mar 3) I see speed measured in 700-900 k/s during
pkg downloads, shouldn't I be
Cleaning out a machine I'm about to bring down and reinstall hipster
in place of 151_9 that has been running there.
I found one stubborn snapshot that zfs destroy just will not remove.
Tried -f flag -r and -R flags
The zfs message says the snapshot is busy.
I could not find any evidence of it
I just completed my very first send/receive. I was suprised to find
no .zfs directories once the recv completed.
Did I do something wrong or is that normal?
Am I supposed to create them?
Here is what I did in general.
On send-host I had two fs p0/vb p0/vb/vm
Sent/recv'ed p0/vb and then ditto
Doug Hughes writes:
> silly question: is the filesystem mounted on the receive side? if
> you just sent it, you'll want to mount it.
Yes, for a silly pilot. You nailed it .. I was to dopey to notice it
was not mounted.
___
Bob Friesenhahn <bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> writes:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to import zpools that I forgot to export before shutdown
>> and fresh install.
>>
>> Or will it be best to mount one of the mirrored discs fr
Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> writes:
> Attempting to burn the latest hipster iso (the gui) to dvd on windows
> 10 platform.
>
> I've gone thru several disks ending in a bad write each time. These
> are disks I've used over time... many times without problems.
>
>
I'm working on updating a host from 151_9 to latest hipster.
Following along at https://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Hipster
Create backup. Really.
Uninstall all packages from opensolaris.org publisher
pkg set-publisher -g http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster -G
Alexander Pyhalov <a...@rsu.ru> writes:
> On 04/ 9/17 05:41 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> 3) It's been said here that the 161030 media will handle creating a
>> mirrored rpool.
>>
>> But when I used that media to install to a vm, I never saw
>>
Nikola M writes:
> Please see if you can make your subjects in ML messages On-topic,
> because I welcome general hardware talk, but we are actually more
> Openindiana/illumos Solaris-derived related then just hardware
> related.
First, thanks for answering with all the good
Sorry to keep hammering on this, but I am still thoroughly confused
about how to prepare used disks for use as rpool under hipster.
I realize it is Sunday and most of you will be relaxing a bit and
probably not pounding away at newsgroups... but hopefully there will
be a few kind souls watching
Hardware: HP xw8600 2x Xeon 5470 - cpu 3.33 Ghz
2 750 Mirrored and 2 3tb mirrored
Following a fresh successful install of hipster on the hardware above,
I've pulled my old 1 tb discs for use elsewhere and installed 2 new
3tb discs.
On bootup I went to BIOS to see if things appeared ok... what I
Setup: oi bld 151_9 running on:
Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5470 @ 3.33GHz - 32 GB ram
I'm about to do fresh install on hardware cited above, of 161030 .. or
might use the 170314 hipster that was offered for test only recently.
(I've been running the test iso since it was offered with
Timothy Coalson writes:
Thanks for the excellent input. I like the details.
[...]
>> root # time zfs send p0/tst.2/isos@170330 | tamp | mbuffer -s 128k -m
>> 1000m -O oi0:31337
>>
>
> tamp is compression, which takes cpu time. Since your network is gigabit
> and you are
Reviewing the oi wiki pages before trying this out I wondered if the
material here:
https://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/2.1+Post-installation
Is still up to date? There has been quite a lot of talk of using
whole discs everywhere possible... no slices, yet it appears that is
what is being said
[Sorry to have messed this up on first go around.. still not sure
how I managed to get the wrong subject in to the original post]
Originall posted under subject:
Subject: What do I need to install so that ~/.inputrc
Which is completely unsuitable to the actual subject.
Hopefully I haven't
When I tried install vbox-5.1.18 with `pkgadd -d':
I get this error:
Oracle VM VirtualBox(i386) 5.1.18,REV=2017.03.15.16.41.114002
Oracle Corporation
## Executing checkinstall script.
Checking package dependencies...
## Missing packages:
## IPS : system/library/gcc/gcc-c++-runtime or
Jerry Kemp writes:
> I'm not running hipster yet. I need to figure out a new ATX board to
> upgrade to before I move from older code to hipster.
I used versions of Vbox from earlyish 4.0.X all the way up to 5.0.28
on older code too. oi bld 151_9.
The first big
Geoff Nordli writes:
> basically the answer is this:
>
> build# pkgtrans VirtualBox-5.1.18-SunOS-amd64-r114002.pkg . all
> Transferring package instance
> build# rm SUNWvbox/install/checkinstall
> build# sed -i /checkinstall/d SUNWvbox/pkgmap
>
Since I appear not to skilled enough to get a working vbox running, I
wondered if other vm options might be in better shape.
Can anyone say what the state of KVM is on latest hipster?
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
Alexander Pyhalov writes:
[...]
Harry wrote:
>> I don't understand what is different about hipster that it just
>> absolutely cannot handle the pkgs on offer at Vbox. I mean the ready
>> made binaries.
>>
>
Alexander P replied:
> Hi.
> This is not about OI, it's about
> Hi Brogyi
>
> Could it be that you ran into https://www.illumos.org/issues/7797?
> Is your Installation up to date?
> Would be interesting to know if that is the case.
Excuse me barging in but I hit that issue on boot up with at least 2
hipster hosts.. one hardware 1 vm
Both are thoroughly up
Nikola M <minik...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 04/ 9/17 04:18 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> PS - I'm on 151_9 getting it ready to reinstall from hipster.. not on
>> it because I want to continue using it. But thanks for the comments
>> on that as well.
>>
>> I m
Wanting to get vms running that I brought over when making the move to
hipster from 151_9... I found first that newer vbox versions are a
no-go for now.
So, went back to 5.0.28 and I can see it wants to install .. it went
like this (large chunks elided):
root # pkgadd -d
Andreas Wacknitz writes:
> You will have to manually remove the remnents of it by issuing
> svccfg delete metainit
> After that it may also be necessary to run
> svcadm clear metainit
Thanks. Here, `svcadm clear' complains of not having a matching
pattern. Which, of
On a fresh install of hipster from iso on vbox vm. Hosted on an OI
host running 151a9...
After getting things going... I follishly assumed the setting that
causes the panel at screen bottom to hide until you mouse over or near
it. Like it is supposed to do I think. would just work.
But anyway,
setup:
SunOS 2x 5.11 oi_151a9 i86pc i386 i86pc
Running on HP xw8600 2x of these:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5470 @ 3.33GHz XU1 PROCESSOR
I've been running build 151a9 for a good while but starting to see
problems with compatibility in some areas... had a few go arounds with
ssh, and now the
cjt <chelj...@prodigy.net> writes:
> On 04/07/2017 11:39 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Mine are exact mirrors of 2 disks. I just want to make sure this bit
>> from `man zpool' is not referring to those kind of shared disks. And
>> that I do NOT have to b
301 - 400 of 542 matches
Mail list logo