On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jonathan Giles
wrote:
> Tomas, I hope you'll agree that throughout our long discussion on JBS we
> both improved our implementations based on our discussion. To say that I
> haven't addressed your issues isn't fair - I worked with you to understand
> your issues a
Tomas,
I hope you'll agree that throughout our long discussion on JBS we both improved
our implementations based on our discussion. To say that I haven't addressed
your issues isn't fair - I worked with you to understand your issues and I
addressed many of them as my InputMap implementation and
Hi Jonathan,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Giles
wrote:
> Tomas,
>
> As it stands there exists two approaches being proposed (my one and
> yours). The purpose of my job is to create new API that benefits the
> community - your disappointment that I'm doing that is itself disappointin
Tomas,
As it stands there exists two approaches being proposed (my one and
yours). The purpose of my job is to create new API that benefits the
community - your disappointment that I'm doing that is itself
disappointing to me! :-) I couldn't progress our discussion in
JDK-8091189 any further
I provided my feedback on the input mapping API some 4 months ago here (be
warned, it is a *long* discussion)
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091189
I am very disappointed that this API is being pushed forward with all its
flaws. It is both overly complex (both conceptually and in terms
On 08/18/2015 03:23 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Currently the gradle openZip method makes it easy to create builds that
unpack into OpenJDK / Zulu JDK but this assumes a pre-Jigsaw (JRE)
structure
and doesn't work with JDK9. Shall I submit a bug?
We are in the process of making major changes
Chien,
Please review the fix:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129401
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vadim/8129401/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Vadim
Thanks for confirming. We have at least one other example of a similar
issue that still happens in 8u60:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133826
Can you please file a new bug? Your issue may or may not be the same as
JDK-8133826, so it would be good to have another test case.
Thanks
Hi Kevin,
sorry for not mentioning that: it's JDK8u60.
I've just double checked and reinstalled it from oracle.com.
P.S. I also attache the screenshot.
Regards,
Konstantin Pasko
2015-08-19 16:40 GMT+02:00 Kevin Rushforth :
> What version of the JDK are you using? We fixed bugs in this area in
What version of the JDK are you using? We fixed bugs in this area in
8u60, which may (or may not) have fixed this.
-- Kevin
Konstantin Pasko wrote:
Hi guys,
I've found a very strange thing about JavaFX and borders.
If an element has "*-fx-border-width: 1 1 1 1;*", then the border will be a
Jonathan,
Please review the fix:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133839
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vadim/8133839/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Vadim
Hi guys,
I've found a very strange thing about JavaFX and borders.
If an element has "*-fx-border-width: 1 1 1 1;*", then the border will be a
bit blur (not exactly 1px).
But if it's declared as "*-fx-border-width: 0 1 1 1;*", then the border is
perfectly sharp (exactly 1px).
I've attached java
12 matches
Mail list logo
