Re: pisces, produceFillAlphas

Hi Johan, Have you been able to find enough time to be able to answer this question? In my present situation, clarity on these issues is extremely important to me and I would guess to many others as well. Thanks, Felix > On 18 Oct 2015, at 19:01, Felix Bembrick wrote: > > Hi Johan, > > If

Re: Bug when combining ListView and SortedList?

Zitat von "Fisher, Robert" : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141124 This is a regression introduced in 1.8.0_60, so it might have a different origin than the problems you mention. Thanks! You are right, the "visible" behavior indeed is a regression. The underlying reason - i

FW: [9] Review request for JDK-8134716 - Remove use of internal classes methods from toys/Hello

Kevin, guys, HelloFPS.java and HelloHighContrast.java can't be removed, therefore they should be moved to rt/tests. Please review the following solution: BUG: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8134716 WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ekleyman/JDK-8134716/ Thanks, Elina

Re: Java 8 updates are causing "Apps that use non-public APIs will be rejected"

[taking awt-dev off of this thread] The fix that was put into 8u72-b02 is that the packager will no longer include libjfxwebkit.dylib in the packaged app. Is this not working correctly? -- Kevin Sergey Bylokhov wrote: I think openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net (cc) is correct place to ask this q

Re: Java 8 updates are causing "Apps that use non-public APIs will be rejected"

There have been cases where Apple received the updated delivery and didn’t test the updated bits or sent the old rejection letter for some reason. I’m not exactly sure what it took and I’m not 100% sure this is the case but it required Apple to examine the new upload. I have an app that I’m abo

Re: Java 8 updates are causing "Apps that use non-public APIs will be rejected"

Just in order to better understand this issue and the fix. Does this mean that the packager will now ALWAYS delete the libjfxwebkit.dylib when building a DMG file? That would mean that I could not bundle and distribute any application anymore for the Mac which uses a WebView. Have you considered

Re: Bug when combining ListView and SortedList?

Jonathan, thanks for the clarification, I indeed misunderstood the new tag. On the other hand: not all (related) selection issues are tagged as such, are those in danger of not being fixed for 9? Anyway, all of them _could_ be fixed in one stroke by throwing away the evil MultipleSelectionMode

HEADS-UP: switching to gradle 2.8 for FX 9 builds

As a heads-up, we will be switching FX 9 production builds to using gradle 2.8 for building in the near future. See: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090171 Very soon -- later this week if all goes well -- we will "flip the switch" to make 2.8 the default for building the FX jake bits

Re: Java 8 updates are causing "Apps that use non-public APIs will be rejected"

Yes, this is correct. We consider this only a short term workaround for the problem. A longer term solution will be needed that will allow distributing WebView applications. Chris: is there a way to override this behavior? -- Kevin Dr. Michael Paus wrote: Just in order to better understand t

Re: HEADS-UP: switching to gradle 2.8 for FX 9 builds

And of course right after I sent this out, I see that gradle 2.9 was released today. If testing looks good, we might switch to 2.9 instead. -- Kevin Kevin Rushforth wrote: As a heads-up, we will be switching FX 9 production builds to using gradle 2.8 for building in the near future. See: h

Re: Bug when combining ListView and SortedList?

If there are any that I've missed or that you think are higher priority, leave a comment in the jira issue or email me the issue IDs. -- Jonathan On 18/11/15 1:55 AM, faste...@swingempire.de wrote: Jonathan, thanks for the clarification, I indeed misunderstood the new tag. On the other hand

Re: Java 8 updates are causing "Apps that use non-public APIs will be rejected"

I think openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net (cc) is correct place to ask this question. On 16.11.15 23:10, Ondřej Kvasnovský wrote: Hi, We are facing to an issue with latest Java updates when we try to release apps into Apple app store. I have described the issue here, with all my findings: http://on

[9] RFR: 8091485: Ensemble8: Review each sample description, playground, appearance, related docs and links

Kevin, Jonathan and Leif, Could you please review my changes for 8091485? The issues that I found are enumerated in the bug description. Thanks much, --morris WEBREV - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~morris/JDK-8091485.01/ BUG - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091485

Re: Java 8 updates are causing "Apps that use non-public APIs will be rejected"

The change is only for the Mac App Store. You can easily look at the changeset associated with JDK-8138650 to verify this: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/761213753af4 This is the relevant code change: +++ b/mod

Re: Java 8 updates are causing "Apps that use non-public APIs will be rejected"

Not for a DMG file, just .pkgs that are intended for the app store. So .app, .dmg, and normal .pkgs will have unaltered jres. The Mac App Store .pkgs will be made to conform to mac app store standards. > On Nov 17, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Dr. Michael Paus wrote: > > Just in order to better underst

Re: pisces, produceFillAlphas

This is an ongoing effort. Performance is #1 on my list, but it is also a very complex issue. I will inform this list on relevant progress I make. It is impossible to say how much time I need for this, but in the end, I'll get there (and only then I will be able to tell how much time it took). - J

[Review request] 8090865: Please make Toolkit.enterNestedEventLoop and exitNestedEventLoop public API

Hi all, Please review the new API proposal for the ability to enter and exit nested event loops at the URL below. The proposed patch file is attached to the jira issue. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090865 Thanks, -- Jonathan

Re: Java 8 updates are causing "Apps that use non-public APIs will be rejected"

> On Nov 17, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Kevin Rushforth > wrote: > > [taking awt-dev off of this thread] > > The fix that was put into 8u72-b02 is that the packager will no longer > include libjfxwebkit.dylib in the packaged app. Is this not working correctly? > I have downloaded that jdk1.8.0_72 b05

Re: Java 8 updates are causing "Apps that use non-public APIs will be rejected"

> On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:21 PM, Michael Hall wrote: > >> On Nov 17, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Kevin Rushforth >> wrote: >> >> [taking awt-dev off of this thread] >> >> The fix that was put into 8u72-b02 is that the packager will no longer >> include libjfxwebkit.dylib in the packaged app. Is this n