[9] review request: 8150109: Cannot build FX apps or tests with JDK 9

Chien & Dave, Please review the following webrev to fix "gradle apps" and "gradle test" so they can compile when using JDK 9 as the boot JDK. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150109 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8150109/webrev.00/ Most of these are a result of old NB-generated buil

[9] review request: 8134709: Cannot compile FXDnD with JDK 9: DropTargetContext::addNotify, removeNotify not found

[fixed cut-and-paste error in the URL of the webrev and added bug description to subject line] Sergey & Alexander, Please review the following, which will allow the FX sdk to build with JDK 9. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8134709 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8134709/webrev.00/

[9] review request: 8134709

Sergey & Alexander, Please review the following, which will allow the FX sdk to build with JDK 9. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8134709 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8150109/webrev.00/ The premise of the fix, which just comments out the calls to the removed methods, is that sinc

Re: [9] review request: 8149967: Cannot compile JFXPanel with JDK 9: SurfaceData::getDefaultScale not found

Ah, I see. I missed that point. -- Kevin Jim Graham wrote: I think what Sergey was getting at is that in the short term you could use GC.getDefaultTransform() without any reflection as a workaround, but if you've already done the reflection work and it's going away shortly it doesn't really

Re: [9] review request: 8149967: Cannot compile JFXPanel with JDK 9: SurfaceData::getDefaultScale not found

I think what Sergey was getting at is that in the short term you could use GC.getDefaultTransform() without any reflection as a workaround, but if you've already done the reflection work and it's going away shortly it doesn't really matter. In the end you would want to use the getScaleXY() met

Re: [Review request] 8088853: Applying dashed border to separator makes whole application hang

Looks great. Approved... ...jim On 2/17/2016 1:11 AM, Andrey Rusakov wrote: Updated that: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arusakov/8088853/webrev.01 17.02.2016 01:22, Jim Graham пишет: [I believe you sent this to t

Re: plans to make JavaFX 8 platform independent again?

Hi, In general I think this whole Spinner thing is completely bogus Suppose the following: > Spinner s = new Spinner<>(0.0, 1.0, 0.0); > s.valueProperty().addListener( new > ChangeListener() { > > @Override >

Re: plans to make JavaFX 8 platform independent again?

Hi Stefan, Java and JavaFX are platform-independent, so asking whether we will "make it platform-independent again" is asking the wrong question. Really, your question should be: can a fix for a serious bug be backported to JDK 8 after it is fixed in JDK 9. The answer to that question is "ye

plans to make JavaFX 8 platform independent again?

Dear JavaFX team, over years one of the key features of Java was its platform independence. A Java application would run under Windows, Mac OS, and Linux (if well programmed). Since https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146325 this is no longer the case. Once you use the JavaFX Spinner c

MOVE cursor not visible on Mac OS

Hello, It seems the MOVE cursor is not displayed on Mac OS. You just get the default cursor. You can reproduce this easily e.g. using a ScrollPane with setPannable(true). Is this a bug or a restriction of Mac OS itself? I think there is an appropriate cursor available somehow, because in Google

Re: [9] review request: 8149967: Cannot compile JFXPanel with JDK 9: SurfaceData::getDefaultScale not found

Also, I plan to fix all remaining issues in the next day or two such that developers could switch to a JDK 9 boot JDK by the end of this week, which should make the fact that the JFXPanel scale is wrong when testing with JDK 8 less of a concern. -- Kevin Kevin Rushforth wrote: Thanks. I'll s

Re: [9] review request: 8149967: Cannot compile JFXPanel with JDK 9: SurfaceData::getDefaultScale not found

Thanks, Sergey. I will file a follow-up issue to remove the reflection code and provide a suitable replacement. -- Kevin Sergey Bylokhov wrote: Note that in jdk9 the same data can be obtained via GraphicsConfiguration.getDefaultTransform(); On 17.02.16 2:53, Jim Graham wrote: I added a c

Re: [9] review request: 8149967: Cannot compile JFXPanel with JDK 9: SurfaceData::getDefaultScale not found

Thanks. I'll send out a formal "heads-up" later today about moving to JDK 9 as the boot JDK. I hope to do this within two weeks if no issues arise. -- Kevin Jim Graham wrote: I added a comment on the bug about BC, but it sounds like you already considered it. I'm fine with this as is, but w

Re: [9] review request: 8149967: Cannot compile JFXPanel with JDK 9: SurfaceData::getDefaultScale not found

Note that in jdk9 the same data can be obtained via GraphicsConfiguration.getDefaultTransform(); On 17.02.16 2:53, Jim Graham wrote: I added a comment on the bug about BC, but it sounds like you already considered it. I'm fine with this as is, but would push for moving to JDK9 ASAP...

Re: [Review request] 8088853: Applying dashed border to separator makes whole application hang

Updated that: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arusakov/8088853/webrev.01 17.02.2016 01:22, Jim Graham пишет: [I believe you sent this to the wrong mailing list - the "-request" list is for changing your membership to the mailing list, not f