Submitted a new bug with ID: 9052190.
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then please file one
>
>
> I thought I would point to "8188314: Fix typos in FX API docs" even though
> the exact changes I'm proposing
Hi,
Please review the below simple fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193590
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbilla/8193590/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Murali
Nir Lisker wrote:
If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then please file one
I thought I would point to "8188314: Fix typos in FX API docs" even
though the exact changes I'm proposing are not listed there, but I can
submit a new bug just for those if it really matters (it will be
anot
>
> If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then please file one
I thought I would point to "8188314: Fix typos in FX API docs" even though
the exact changes I'm proposing are not listed there, but I can submit a
new bug just for those if it really matters (it will be another Fix Typos
issue).
>
> I also note that tith simple javadoc changes...
"with" simple ...
-- Kevin
Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Nir Lisker wrote:
> This shows a lack of understanding about our processes
Yes it does, which is why I asked about it yesterday. I'll send a
webrev.
Ah, I haven't gotten to your email f
Nir Lisker wrote:
> This shows a lack of understanding about our processes
Yes it does, which is why I asked about it yesterday. I'll send a webrev.
Ah, I haven't gotten to your email from yesterday, since I was on
vacation and am still catching up. If you can send a webrev, and a
pointer
> This shows a lack of understanding about our processes
Yes it does, which is why I asked about it yesterday. I'll send a webrev.
Thanks,
Nir
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> Why would you even try to push a changeset without getting it reviewed
> first???
>
> This sho
Why would you even try to push a changeset without getting it reviewed
first???
This shows a lack of understanding about our processes and policies.
Only committers have permission to push changesets, and only after
review. Please familiarize yourself with the policies and procedures
surround
Iv'e created a small documentation fix and tried to push it to
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt. I got an error:
abort: push creates new remote head 2152a80ee902!
hint: pull and merge or see 'hg help push' for details about pushing new
heads
[command returned code 255 Tue Jan 09 19:40
