I've never seen and don't see it slowing down other applications (I'm on
a MacBook Pro 13'') but I reported the DropShadow slow down and
documented the solution [1].
Tom
[1]
https://openjfx-dev.openjdk.java.narkive.com/I8NIK0db/bad-dropshadow-performance
On 04.11.18 20:22, Nir Lisker wrote:
>>
>
It should.
I have the following:
javafx.version = 11.0.1-ea
Are you using an SDK or maven artifacts? For which platform?
- Johan
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 4:07 PM Michael Paus wrote:
> My application is reporting the following values for the respective
> properties:
>
> java.runtime.version: 11.0
>
> I don't have access to the OpenJDK bug tracker so I can't file a bug
> report for this
>
You can do it at https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 9:18 PM Mike Hearn wrote:
> I'm on macOS High Sierra with a very new and very high end MacBook Pro.
>
> I have a pretty basi
I'm on macOS High Sierra with a very new and very high end MacBook Pro.
I have a pretty basic GUI that uses translucency fairly aggressively. I
added a DropShadow effect to some nodes, which looks great, but to my great
surprise this one line of code kills the UI performance not of my app, but
oth
I think the more general problem is that they don‘t run on the module-path - in
the m2e case this because the modules are transitive deps and those are not
supported properly
Tom
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 04.11.2018 um 16:17 schrieb José Pereda :
>
> I've just noticed that this issue ha
I've just noticed that this issue happens not only with Maven but also with
Gradle projects (Gradle + Eclipse 2018-09 + Windows with Oracle JDK 1.8),
running gradle tasks from Eclipse.
The same proposed workaround can be applied to the build file:
run {
systemProperty "java.library.path", "C
My application is reporting the following values for the respective
properties:
java.runtime.version: 11.0.1+13
java.class.version: 55.0
java.version: 11.0.1
javafx.version: 11
Shouldn't "javafx.version" follow the same naming conventions as used by
"java.version"?
Am 02.11.18 um 09:59 schr
