On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 18:00:25 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> why a second pr for the same issue (see
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/73)? particularly one that doesn't do
>> much more/else/better (than clamping, which isn't good enough)?
>
> I have exactly the same question.
>
> In
Hi Dirk,
Thanks for reaching out. As stated earlier, I want to know what exactly is
causing this change in behaviour. I also want to know what is the expected
behaviour in this case: should TAB key press trigger when the popupwindow is
showing?
-- Abhinay
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:09:57 GMT, Florian Kirmaier wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> ticket: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236259
>>
>> The fix itself is quite straight forward.
>> It basically just removed the listener which causes the leak.
>>
>> The unit-test for the fix is a bit
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:43:29 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> I don't see an API in the discussion, on how to remove a specific listener.
>> Did i miss something? It seems to me, that the API is written to support
>> only a single listener per property.
>
> the api is in a related issue
Changeset: b2ac76a9
Author:Kevin Rushforth
Date: 2020-03-05 20:58:03 +
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/commit/b2ac76a9
8240451: JavaFX javadoc build fails with JDK 14
Reviewed-by: nlisker, jvos
!
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:12:23 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> The JDK 14 javadoc will emit a warning for an `@pram` tag of a generic
> parameter if not surrounded by `<` and `>`. This will in turn fail the build,
> since we treat warnings as errors. There are 5 classes in JavaFX with this
>
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:17:57 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> The JDK 14 javadoc will emit a warning for an `@pram` tag of a generic
>> parameter if not surrounded by `<` and `>`. This will in turn fail the
>> build, since we treat warnings as errors. There are 5 classes in JavaFX with
>> this error.
Changeset: cf0bba62
Author:Arun Joseph
Committer: Kevin Rushforth
Date: 2020-03-05 19:28:25 +
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/commit/cf0bba62
8240211: Stack overflow on Windows 32-bit can lead to crash
Reviewed-by: ghb, kcr, jvos
!
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:51:03 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
> Issue: The stack pointer is checked close to the stack limit during the last
> iteration of calling frameLoaded() and then, grows beyond the thread's stack
> range causing a stack overflow and crashes. This occurs as the stack grows by
>
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:51:03 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
> Issue: The stack pointer is checked close to the stack limit during the last
> iteration of calling frameLoaded() and then, grows beyond the thread's stack
> range causing a stack overflow and crashes. This occurs as the stack grows by
>
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:46:17 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> Looks good to me.
>> I believe you have executed DRT on both 64 & 32 bit build.
>
> This looks correct and very valuable to me. Would be great if there was a
> test that results in a crash before?
Here is a pointer to the
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:01:25 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> This PR fixes JDK-8176270 by clamping the end index of the selected text to
>> the length of the text.
>
> why a second pr for the same issue (see
> https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/73)? particularly one that doesn't do
> much
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:50:55 GMT, Guru Hb wrote:
>> Issue: The stack pointer is checked close to the stack limit during the last
>> iteration of calling frameLoaded() and then, grows beyond the thread's stack
>> range causing a stack overflow and crashes. This occurs as the stack grows
>> by
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:12:23 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> The JDK 14 javadoc will emit a warning for an `@pram` tag of a generic
> parameter if not surrounded by `<` and `>`. This will in turn fail the build,
> since we treat warnings as errors. There are 5 classes in JavaFX with this
>
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:01:10 GMT, Robert Lichtenberger
wrote:
> This PR fixes JDK-8176270 by clamping the end index of the selected text to
> the length of the text.
why a second pr for the same issue (see
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/73)? particularly one that doesn't do much
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:51:03 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
> Issue: The stack pointer is checked close to the stack limit during the last
> iteration of calling frameLoaded() and then, grows beyond the thread's stack
> range causing a stack overflow and crashes. This occurs as the stack grows by
>
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:51:03 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
> Issue: The stack pointer is checked close to the stack limit during the last
> iteration of calling frameLoaded() and then, grows beyond the thread's stack
> range causing a stack overflow and crashes. This occurs as the stack grows by
>
This PR fixes JDK-8176270 by clamping the end index of the selected text to the
length of the text.
-
Commits:
- e78e8793: 8176270: Adding ChangeListener to TextField.selectedTextProperty
causes StringOutOfBoundsException
- d849c67c: Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
Issue: The stack pointer is checked close to the stack limit during the last
iteration of calling frameLoaded() and then, grows beyond the thread's stack
range causing a stack overflow and crashes. This occurs as the stack grows by
an amount larger than the reserved zone at the end of the
So what info do you need? What test do you want us to run?
I ran it on MacOS X with Java 14ea and I DO NOT see the „TAB“ output.
Dirk
> Am 05.03.2020 um 11:43 schrieb Abhinay Agarwal :
>
> import javafx.application.Application;
> import javafx.scene.Scene;
> import
Hi,
We have come across a behavioural change in ComboBox b/w JavaFX 8 and 9+.
We are not sure if its a regression or a bug fix which is causing it.
Therefore, I am reaching out to the community for insight.
If you run the following example, open the popup window in ComboBox and press
TAB:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:27:27 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Memory allocated in initDecompressor() and decompressIndirect() is not freed
>> in error case.
>> In error case,
>> 1. Allocated memory should be freed.
>> 2. Appropriate de-initialization jpeg library calls should be added.
>>
>>
22 matches
Mail list logo
