On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:30:46 GMT, PrimosK
wrote:
>>> > The build failed again. The only difference I can spot at this time is
>>> > the line at which the build failed (it changed from 3445 to 3453):
>>> > ...
>>> > Please let me know if you need any further information.
>>>
>>> You might be
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:20:21 GMT, PrimosK
wrote:
>> when passing `--info` to gradle, the build succeeds. Without passing
>> `--info` it fails. I'll do more testing later.
>
>> > The build failed again. The only difference I can spot at this time is the
>> > line at which the build failed (it
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 23:47:32 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This PR changes the parameter names to accommodate class calculations
>> related to screen event coordinates (AbsX, AbsY).
>>
>> As
>>
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 23:43:10 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> This PR changes the parameter names to accommodate class calculations related
> to screen event coordinates (AbsX, AbsY).
>
> As
>
This PR changes the parameter names to accommodate class calculations related
to screen event coordinates (AbsX, AbsY).
As
[discussed](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206253?focusedCommentId=14405707=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14405707),
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:37:10 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> If it isn't too hard to make the running of the other three jobs dependent
>> on the wrapper validation job, that would be good, as long as the validation
>> job is fast. The other three still need to run in parallel with each other.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:55:18 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> Okay, this is looking better! The validation took only 23 seconds, and
>> GitHub shows the following results:
>>
>>
> See the [Gradle Wrapper Validation
> Action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/gradle-wrapper-validation) for
> details on this pull request. I'll test the changes with the following
> sequence of commits:
>
> 1. This commit adds a tampered Gradle Wrapper JAR file, which should go
>
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:13:09 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Thanks, Kevin. I'll merge the two workflow files.
>>
>> The test results aren't what I expected:
>>
>>
> See the [Gradle Wrapper Validation
> Action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/gradle-wrapper-validation) for
> details on this pull request. I'll test the changes with the following
> sequence of commits:
>
> 1. This commit adds a tampered Gradle Wrapper JAR file, which should go
>
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:00:14 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> It might be better to include the validation task in the same
>> [`submit.yml`](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/blob/master/.github/workflows/submit.yml)
>> file as the pre-submit tests, as a separate job. That way it will get the
>>
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 21:44:03 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> So far, so good. The tampered file was not detected:
>>
>> 
>>
>> The next commit will add the Official
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 21:23:47 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>>> 1. This commit adds a tampered Gradle Wrapper JAR file, which should go
>>> undetected.
>>> 2. The next commit will add the Official Gradle Wrapper Validation Action,
>>> which should detect the tampered file.
>>> 3. The final commit
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 20:38:09 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> See the [Gradle Wrapper Validation
>> Action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/gradle-wrapper-validation)
>> for details on this pull request. I'll test the changes with the following
>> sequence of commits:
>>
>> 1. This
> See the [Gradle Wrapper Validation
> Action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/gradle-wrapper-validation) for
> details on this pull request. I'll test the changes with the following
> sequence of commits:
>
> 1. This commit adds a tampered Gradle Wrapper JAR file, which should go
>
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 20:34:05 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
> 1. This commit adds a tampered Gradle Wrapper JAR file, which should go
> undetected.
> 2. The next commit will add the Official Gradle Wrapper Validation Action,
> which should detect the tampered file.
> 3. The final commit will
See the [Gradle Wrapper Validation
Action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/gradle-wrapper-validation) for
details on this pull request. I'll test the changes with the following sequence
of commits:
1. This commit adds a tampered Gradle Wrapper JAR file, which should go
undetected.
2.
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:37:35 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> Issue is that the size of properties that are relatively(`em`) sized is not
> computed correctly when the reference `-fx-font-size` is also specified
> relatively and is nested.
>
> Fix is a slight variation of an earlier suggestion in
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:07:30 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>>> The build failed again. The only difference I can spot at this time is the
>>> line at which the build failed (it changed from 3445 to 3453):
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you need any further information.
>>
>> You might be
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:17:23 GMT, mstr2
wrote:
> The Slider control does not have the ":horizontal" CSS pseudo-class set by
> default. The pseudo-class is only set once the "orientation" property is
> changed. This PR fixes that.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:06:02 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Hi dear OpenJdk team,
>>
>> At first I would like to thank you for looking into this. I am the author of
>> original `8262276` ticket.
>>
>> I would just like to share some additional information with you. I've
>> fetched and checked
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 15:36, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> The basic primitive
> that would be required is "transfer this image to this other image".
> You'd need to expose that operation in way that would work for every
> possible pair of rendering APIs ... The complexity of handling that would
>
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 07:49:23 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Issue is that the size of properties that are relatively(`em`) sized is not
>> computed correctly when the reference `-fx-font-size` is also specified
>> relatively and is nested.
>>
>> Fix is a slight variation of an earlier
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 08:16:51 GMT, PrimosK
wrote:
>> Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
>>
>> Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
>> using a simple HelloWebView app.
>
> Hi dear OpenJdk team,
>
> At first I would like to thank you for looking into this.
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:58:17 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
> - Added support to compile media on arm.
> - libffi is based on 3.3.
Marked as reviewed by jvos (Reviewer).
I didn't test it on real hardware, but it looks good and doesn't cause
regression.
-
PR:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 07:49:23 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Issue is that the size of properties that are relatively(`em`) sized is not
>> computed correctly when the reference `-fx-font-size` is also specified
>> relatively and is nested.
>>
>> Fix is a slight variation of an earlier
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 16:07:59 GMT, mstr2
wrote:
>> The Slider control does not have the ":horizontal" CSS pseudo-class set by
>> default. The pseudo-class is only set once the "orientation" property is
>> changed. This PR fixes that.
>
> mstr2 has updated the pull request incrementally with one
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 07:49:23 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Issue is that the size of properties that are relatively(`em`) sized is not
>> computed correctly when the reference `-fx-font-size` is also specified
>> relatively and is nested.
>>
>> Fix is a slight variation of an earlier
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 06:41:53 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
> Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
>
> Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
> using a simple HelloWebView app.
Hi dear OpenJdk team,
At first I would like to thank you for looking into this. I am the
29 matches
Mail list logo
