No, this light is created internally within JavaFX as a convenient light
source if the scene doesn't have one. User can't access to it reference.
You can find this information in the Scene class documentation:
Class Scene
...
A default headlight will be added to a scene that contains one or m
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179464
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8179464/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix as part of the effort to make prism-d3d
build warning free.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179405
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8179405/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178837
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8178837/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178804
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8178804/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
usage.
I hope the bug fix will also be backported to Java 8.
Michael
Am 12.04.17 um 22:19 schrieb Chien Yang:
BTW, it is a bug that we are unaware of if you are seeing a 60X
nominal memory consumption in your program. Please file a JIRA with
a test program and we will investigate it.
Thanks
BTW, it is a bug that we are unaware of if you are seeing a 60X nominal
memory consumption in your program. Please file a JIRA with a test
program and we will investigate it.
Thanks,
- Chien
On 4/10/2017 1:08 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
We are planning some performance improvements in JDK 10
Hi Jonathan and Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163385
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8163385/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
itten with an enclosing
{@code } or {@literal.
-- Jon
On 02/28/2017 03:00 PM, Chien Yang wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163384
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8163384/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi all,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163384
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8163384/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin and Jonathan,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173796
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8173796/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8172364
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8172364/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171852
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8171852/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170624
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8170624/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Jonathan,
Please review the proposed fix and investigation in the JIRA.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170500
Thanks,
- Chien
Jim or Kevin,
Please review this simple fix posted in the JIRA:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170421
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Jim and Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166932
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8166932/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Yes, we decide to punt on ImagePattern as there isn't a trivial way to
find a reasonable background color for it.
- Chien
On 11/10/16, 10:22 AM, Jim Graham wrote:
I guess we'll punt on ImagePattern?
Other than that the fix looks fine...
...jim
On 11/9/16 5:35 PM,
with
StageStyle.TRANSPARENT?
What happens if i set the Scene.fill to an rgba value? Doesn't this lead to a
different color than what you get today where the background stage background
is always white?
Tom
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 10.11.2016 um 02:35 schrieb Chien Yang:
Hi Jim and Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088179
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8088179/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Phil,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168616
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8168616/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review this one line cleanup fix (diff in the JIRA):
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168821
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166470
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8166470/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166934
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8166934/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix. In this fix I also took the chance to
fix the wildcard import issue in this file:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166933
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8166933/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165363
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8165363/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165378
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8165378/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed doc fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164141
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8164141/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review this proposed doc fix:
JIRA:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130675
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8130675/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Based on my recollection, this oddity (2 contexts) is because we use
CALayer on Mac. We have tested in early prototype, when we did the
switch from JOGL to native GL, Prism implementation on Linux works fine
with a single GL context.
- Chien
On 8/11/2016 2:08 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
It looks li
Hi Kevin,
Please review this proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163383
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8163383/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
should have the Bug ID of the main bug: 8156078
Thanks.
-- Kevin
Chien Yang wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed backport:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163302
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8163302/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed backport:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156078
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8156078/backport.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed backport:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163302
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8163302/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156078
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8156078/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Jonathan and Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162883
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8162883/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin and Dave,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154148
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8154148/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Vote: YES
On 7/19/16 6:37 AM, David Hill wrote:
I hereby nominate Ankit Srivastava to OpenJFX Committer.
Ankit Srivastava is part of the JavaFX team focusing on Web.
A list of Ankit's commits and reviews is available by the following links
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/log?rev
Hi Jonathan,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8148721
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8148721/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
e progress indicator issues are all done as talked, GREAT!
Are they planned to be included in Java 8?
Cheers,
Diego
-Original Message-----
From: Chien Yang [mailto:chien.y...@oracle.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 8. März 2016 20:41
To: Cirujano Cuesta, Diego;
jonathan.gi...@oracle.com; openjfx-dev@openjd
Hi Dave and Jonathan,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088846
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8088846/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Jonathan,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090322
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158006
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8158006/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review this proposed fix as we have discussed earlier.
Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158948
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review this proposed fix as we have discussed earlier.
Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159005
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158004
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8158004/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed unit test:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157500
Webev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8157500/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the simple bug fix as we have investigated:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159383
Thanks,
- Chien
Kevin and Vadim,
Please review this simple fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159021
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8159021/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi all,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144585
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8144585/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi all,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158659
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8158659/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin, Jonathon and Vadim,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157900
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8157900/webrev.00/
PS: This is a huge webrev and touches many components. I believe most
component owners would want to do a quick
Hi Kevin,
Please review the suggested fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091874
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8091874/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix as we have discussed.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157350
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8157350/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Jonathan and Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157295
JIRA: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8157295/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Jonathan and Kevin,
Please review this simple clean up fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157186
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8157186/webrev.00/index.html
Hi Jonathan and Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155998
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8155998/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
lack of mutating methods and possibly mentioning the intent in the
javadoc...
...jim
On 5/3/2016 11:24 PM, Chien Yang wrote:
Kevin and Jim,
Please review the proposed fix:
Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155762
JIRA: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8155762/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin and Jonathan,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156170
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8156170/webrev.00/
- Chien
Kevin and Jim,
Please review the proposed fix:
Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155762
JIRA: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8155762/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
od
java/lang/Object."":()V
9: return
public void bar();
Code:
0: aload_0
1: getfield #1 // Field
this$0:LInnerPackageTest;
4: invokevirtual #3 // Method
InnerPackageTest.foo:()V
7: return
}
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155757
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8155757/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Vote: YES
On 4/28/16, 8:16 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
I hereby nominate Guru Hb [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
Guru is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle working on WebKit, who has
contributed 10 changesets [5] to OpenJFX, at least 8 of which are
significant.
Votes are due by May 12, 2016.
Only
Hi Kevin,
Please review the purposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155053
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8155053/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review this simple name change cleanup fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154509
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8154509/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Ali,
Context management is tightly couple between Glass and Prism. The fix
will likely touches both places.
- Chien
On 4/16/16, 11:05 AM, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Chien Yang <mailto:chien.y...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hi Ali,
Thanks! I b
also works for javafx8.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:07 AM, Chien Yang <mailto:chien.y...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Thanks reporting your finding and suggestion. Do you mind filing a
bug report? Please include the steps and your system
configuration that we may reproduce the cr
/14/16, 11:20 PM, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
Done. Review ID: JI-9035391
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Chien Yang <mailto:chien.y...@oracle.com>> wrote:
We are interested in knowing how and when you use the software
pipe of JavaFX on Mac. Can you please submit a bug report and
We are interested in knowing how and when you use the software pipe of
JavaFX on Mac. Can you please submit a bug report and provide those
information?
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
Thanks,
- Chien
On 4/14/2016 11:41 AM, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
On macosx v
Thanks reporting your finding and suggestion. Do you mind filing a bug
report? Please include the steps and your system configuration that we
may reproduce the crash on our end.
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
Thanks,
- Chien
On 4/14/2016 12:16 PM, Ali
Please review the proposed specification and implementation.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144556
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8144556/webrev.00/
- Chien
Great! Can you please file a JIRA with your test program. We will
investigate the issue.
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
- Chien
On 3/28/16, 9:06 AM, Tai Hu wrote:
My MacBook Pro is a i5 dual core with 16GB of memory. The minimal application
that exhibit
, Chien Yang wrote:
You are correct. MBP 13 only has an integrated GPU and those 2 fixes
mentioned earlier don't apply to your case.
- Chien
On 3/25/16, 3:15 PM, Tai Hu wrote:
I have a MacBook Pro 13 inch (2014 model). If I remembered correctly, it
only has an integrated GPU. There
You are correct. MBP 13 only has an integrated GPU and those 2 fixes
mentioned earlier don't apply to your case.
- Chien
On 3/25/16, 3:15 PM, Tai Hu wrote:
I have a MacBook Pro 13 inch (2014 model). If I remembered correctly, it
only has an integrated GPU. There is no discreet GPU
Thanks,
Ta
Hi Kevin and all,
Please review the following new API proposal to add a priorityOrder
property to Node:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144556
Here is a prototype of the implementation with a simple toy example if
you wish to play with:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~c
You may track the progress of this work with this JIRA for now. We are
still investigating the scope and impact of this work. We may decide to
create a new JIRA and resolve this as a duplicate if we decide to go
with a better naming.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090322
- Chien
Hi Maurice,
Can you please file a JIRA on this issue?
Thanks,
- Chien
On 3/1/16, 11:45 PM, Maurice wrote:
Jim,
A solution in line of that of Johan Vos [1] works. JavaFX can be run
and doesn't crash on startup when compiling the shaders. I think they
should be taken into account for at leas
the Wiki
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Cross+Building+for+ARM+Hard+Float>.
Maurice.
Op 29-02-16 om 17:49 schreef Chien Yang:
I have a quick question. Did you get your embedded JavaFX library
from Glueon?
http://gluonhq.com/open-source/javafxports/downloads/
- Chien
I have a quick question. Did you get your embedded JavaFX library from
Glueon?
http://gluonhq.com/open-source/javafxports/downloads/
- Chien
On 2/29/16, 7:21 AM, Maurice wrote:
Should I file a bug? I can't determine whether this is a client
platform issue or a major bug in the EGL that JavaF
Hi Kevin and Jonathan,
Please review the proposed fix and the detail of the fix is recorded in
the JIRA:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8137252
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8137252/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
, but also using more than one rectangular shape.
Every rectangular shape beyond the first seems to reduce my FPS by 10.
I'm using JDK 1.80_60 by the way.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Chien Yang <mailto:chien.y...@oracle.com>> wrote:
It will be great if you can include in
It will be great if you can include in your bug report the following 2
piece of information:
1) Run your program with -Dprism.verbose=true. This will give us the
graphics hardware information of your system.
2) Run your program with -Dprism.order=sw. This will force JavaFX to use
its softwar
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed robot test:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8140306/webrev.00/
I have verified that it works well on Mac, Linux and Windows.
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147010
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8147010/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix as we have investigated yesterday:
The fix is to check and handle correctly when there is change in the
underlaying nativeWindow. This is the case happened on Linux when we do
fullscreen in Applet mode.
Passed dev-build-lite run on Linux and Mac.
JIR
Hi Johan,
Can you please file a JIRA for this?
Thanks,
- Chien
On 12/30/15 04:33, Johan Vos wrote:
When upgrading a Nexus 6 from Android 5.1.1 to Android 6, the JavaFX 3D
stopped working.
The relevant error is this:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Error creating fragment shader
in
com.sun.prism.e
Hi Chris,
JavaFX may run on Intel GMA 3150, but it is not a supported GPU. There
is a high likelihood that the drop in performance is caused by the
switch from sw pipe (Debian Wheezy) to es2 pipe (Debian Jessie). GMA
3150 is an underpowered GPU for JavaFX's es2 pipe. You can try forcing
JavaF
Vote: YES
On 12/21/2015 11:45 AM, David Hill wrote:
I hereby nominate Johan Vos to OpenJFX Committer.
Johan Vos (jvos) has been active in the OpenJFX community, and
instrumental in the maturity of Monocle, the owner of the Android and
IOS ports and is an OpenJFX Author.
A list of Johan's c
The patch looks good to me as it is. Question: Will the change to
Optional makes it at odd with the existing public constructors? Or API
cleanliness though I do see the beauty of using Optional here.
- Chien
On 12/10/15, 2:16 PM, David Grieve wrote:
I believe the url might be used in the CSS e
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix which was moved from JDK-8090866 as per
our conversation:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091170
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8091170/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090866
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8090866/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix.
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144542
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8144542/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
On 12/2/15, 4:46 AM, Robert Krüger wrote:
How much of a priority are quality issues,
especially on the Mac (which clearly is a second-class citizen as far as
JavaFX is concerned)? Are things like flashing when opening Stages, bad
rendering performance, broken media APIs etc. an issue?
We have bee
> The key in Pair could actually be null and in this case hashCode will
throw NPE.
This might be a good enough reason to have this fix.
- Chien
On 11/3/15, 12:07 PM, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
Hmm, yeah, the actual difference is in the prime number only (that is
changing the algorithm only doesn
And by default Java 3D uses D3D on Windows too.
- Chien
On 10/20/15, 6:12 AM, Tom Schindl wrote:
Hi,
I've to admit that I could not follow you completely but JavaFX on
Windows is based on DirectX (OpenGL is only provided for Linux/OS-X
where it is the defacto standard and far from dead).
Tom
Hi Johan,
This optimization is buggy but to see whether it helps you can try setting
-Dprism.scrollcacheopt=true
Please see JDK-8093860 for reason why it was disabled:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8093860
- Chien
On 10/15/15, 12:30 PM, Johan Vos wrote:
Thanks Jim.
I tried with di
Hi Vadim,
Can you please review the proposed fix?
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8137004
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8137004/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hi Jim and Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8136495
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8136495/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
future, you do so here:
http://bugs.java.com/
Thanks.
-- Kevin
José Pereda wrote:
Hi Chien
I'm not allow to do it, so I was going to ask... Please go ahead.
Thank you,
Jose
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Chien Yang <mailto:chien.y...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hi Jose,
Thanks
Hi Jose,
Thanks for the heads-up! I'm able to reproduce the bug on my Macbook Pro
(retina display). I will file a JIRA on this if you haven't done it yet.
Thanks,
- Chien
On 9/12/15, 7:34 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> I haven't found any report of this at http://bugs.openjdk.java.net.
Then m
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo