Hi,
sorry fo the confusion. I thought I was using the 11.0.1 SDK on my Mac
but actually I wasn't. Eclipse again played a prank on me with the
modulepath.
Am 04.11.18 um 20:26 schrieb Johan Vos:
It should.
I have the following:
javafx.version = 11.0.1-ea
Are you using an SDK or maven
It should.
I have the following:
javafx.version = 11.0.1-ea
Are you using an SDK or maven artifacts? For which platform?
- Johan
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 4:07 PM Michael Paus wrote:
> My application is reporting the following values for the respective
> properties:
>
> java.runtime.version:
My application is reporting the following values for the respective
properties:
java.runtime.version: 11.0.1+13
java.class.version: 55.0
java.version: 11.0.1
javafx.version: 11
Shouldn't "javafx.version" follow the same naming conventions as used by
"java.version"?
Am 02.11.18 um 09:59
Yes, a good plan.
-- Kevin
On 11/2/2018 11:38 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
Absolutely. Since this is an ea, I didn't add a link to the release
notes, but once we go for 11.0.1, there should be release notes.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:19 PM Laurent Bourgès
mailto:bourges.laur...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Absolutely. Since this is an ea, I didn't add a link to the release notes,
but once we go for 11.0.1, there should be release notes.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:19 PM Laurent Bourgès
wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> That is important to me to share publicly release notes.
>
> Cheers,
> Laurent
>
> Le ven. 2
As I said, all but the Marlin fix are confidential security bugs. And
no, I can't comment on them. If you are interested, you can go to
Mercurial and look at the changeset diffs. Or you can refer to my email
of Oct 16 with the aggregate webrev [1] for the set of fixes that were
integrated
What is 8204880: Enhance object method calls? It's unviewable.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 3:20 PM Laurent Bourgès
wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> That is important to me to share publicly release notes.
>
> Cheers,
> Laurent
>
> Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 à 14:12, Kevin Rushforth
> a
> écrit :
>
> > The JBS query
Thanks,
That is important to me to share publicly release notes.
Cheers,
Laurent
Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 à 14:12, Kevin Rushforth a
écrit :
> The JBS query would only show up the one Marlin fix, because the rest
> were confidential security bugs. Here is the list, as seen in the 'hg log'
>
>
The JBS query would only show up the one Marlin fix, because the rest
were confidential security bugs. Here is the list, as seen in the 'hg log'
8194321: Update FX installer
8195879: Improve media support
8204365: Improve WebView processing
8204880: Enhance object method calls
8207387: WebView
Hi,
Could you publish the list of included bug fixed (JBS query) ?
Cheers,
Laurent
Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 à 10:00, Johan Vos a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We are about to release JavaFX 11.0.1, containing the fixes that made it
> into the 11-dev repository.
> An early-access build for this is available as
Hi,
We are about to release JavaFX 11.0.1, containing the fixes that made it
into the 11-dev repository.
An early-access build for this is available as SDK/jmods at
http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-jmods.zip
11 matches
Mail list logo
