On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 02:21:05 GMT, yosbits wrote:
> I think you are incorrect about the Null Safe explanation. Wouldn't using
> Optional solve this?
I'm not sure what you are trying to say, the fluent bindings offered by this
API are null safe. Using standard JavaFX you have to do additional w
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 21:49:33 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> John Hendrikx has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Small wording change in API of ObservableValue after proof reading
>
> modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/va
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:59:34 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:59:34 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:59:34 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
> This is an implementation of the proposal in
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
> good test coverage.
>
> This was based on https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/434 but with a
