slapcat old and new + schema conflicts

2006-04-13 Thread matthew sporleder
I am attempting to use slapcat to create an ldif of my 2.1 database. When I use the modern (2.3.21) slapcat on my 2.1 database, it complains about schema conflicts. The 2.1 version, however, does not complain. (This is also true of slapd, which is a little more expected) Should I work on

trouble with access control

2006-04-13 Thread Dr. Harry Knitter
Hello, I am new with Openldap and with this list, too. My problem is as follows: I have set up an openldap server with simple bind. Everything works fine when using rootdn to acess my data. There are several addressbooks in different dns. My access controls are: access to * by * read

Ok, now im getting another error message.

2006-04-13 Thread Lorenz Krause
Ok, now im getting another error message. Look at this: linux:~ # ldapadd -x -D cn=Manager,dc=ronnenberg.de -W -f /testdump.ldif Enter LDAP Password: adding new entry ou=DEZI,o=Rathaus ldap_add: Server is unwilling to perform (53) additional info: global superior knowledge Here is

Re: slapcat old and new + schema conflicts

2006-04-13 Thread Lise Didillon
as I see there are some changes in schemas between the two versions. Now in 2.3: only 1 structural objetClass in an ldap entrie also in an ldif file you must define the define the attribute used for the DN ie.: dn: cn=toto, ou=people, dc=myorg cn: toto in the ACLs in slapd.conf if you have

Re: slapcat old and new + schema conflicts

2006-04-13 Thread Hallvard B Furuseth
matthew sporleder writes: I am attempting to use slapcat to create an ldif of my 2.1 database. When I use the modern (2.3.21) slapcat on my 2.1 database, it complains about schema conflicts. Yuck. Don't do that. To access your database files, use programs from the LDAP version (and

Shell backend: read_and_send_results

2006-04-13 Thread Timur Izhbulatov
Hi all, I'm running openldap-2.3.20 from FreeBSD 6.1-prerelease ports. The slapd server is configured to run my backend shell script. But the server fails to parse my output. It seems the problem is in trailing whitespace in every line except the first (the one with RESULT) which I can see in

Re: Consumer retry with delta-syncrepl

2006-04-13 Thread Howard Chu
Jan-Piet Mens wrote: FWIW, if an entry on the provider is modified every two minutes, the consumer doesn't stop (have been monitoring this for about seven days). OTOH, an update every five minutes is not sufficient, and the consumer falls asleep and doesn't sync with the provider any longer.

Re: Consumer retry with delta-syncrepl

2006-04-13 Thread Howard Chu
Howard Chu wrote: Jan-Piet Mens wrote: FWIW, if an entry on the provider is modified every two minutes, the consumer doesn't stop (have been monitoring this for about seven days). OTOH, an update every five minutes is not sufficient, and the consumer falls asleep and doesn't sync with the

Re: troubles with replication using sync-repl

2006-04-13 Thread Buchan Milne
On Thursday 13 April 2006 09:16, Guillaume Rousse wrote: I would also note that: 2.2.23 is an ancient and known to be very buggy release. If you are going to use 2.2, you should be using 2.2.30. Unfortunatly, I can't do it without manually installing it, and losing distribution

Re: OpenLDAP: Object class modification

2006-04-13 Thread Michael Ströder
Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: I encourage those interested in this feature to contribute to its completion by: - reading the specification (draft-zeilenga-ldap-managedit) and commenting in the appropriate forum (ldapext@ietf.org), Already done. - experiment with the code in HEAD (or

Re: alock + ldbm in 2.3.21

2006-04-13 Thread Michael Ströder
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:10 PM -0400 matthew sporleder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apr 11 15:21:22 labogldir02 slapd[16232]: [ID 658149 local6.debug] ldbm_back_db_open: alock package is unstable; database may be inconsistent! Apr 11 15:21:22

Re: CPPFLAGS=-DOPENLDAP_FD_SETSIZE=8192

2006-04-13 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:45 AM -0300 Marcelo H. Terres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes. I'm using vmware to test this problem. When I'm running openldap 2.2.30 using Debian Woody I had no problems. But if I try to run 2.3.21 in Debian Sarge the problems occur. I'm testing 2.2.30 in

Re: slapcat old and new + schema conflicts

2006-04-13 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:21 AM -0400 matthew sporleder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am attempting to use slapcat to create an ldif of my 2.1 database. When I use the modern (2.3.21) slapcat on my 2.1 database, it complains about schema conflicts. The 2.1 version, however, does not

Re: troubles with replication using sync-repl

2006-04-13 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:16 AM +0200 Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:42 PM +0200 Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. I'm having troubles with replication using sync-repl. I first configured my

Re: Shell backend: read_and_send_results

2006-04-13 Thread Hallvard B Furuseth
Timur Izhbulatov writes: I'm running openldap-2.3.20 from FreeBSD 6.1-prerelease ports. The slapd server is configured to run my backend shell script. But the server fails to parse my output. (...) The slapd log looks like this: (...) Apr 13 13:53:17 fbsd slapd[71478]: shell search reading

Re: Ok, now im getting another error message.

2006-04-13 Thread matthew sporleder
Ok, now im getting another error message. Look at this: linux:~ # ldapadd -x -D cn=Manager,dc=ronnenberg.de -W -f /testdump.ldif Enter LDAP Password: adding new entry ou=DEZI,o=Rathaus ldap_add: Server is unwilling to perform (53) additional info: global superior knowledge

Re: Ok, now im getting another error message.

2006-04-13 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
I suggest you (and other newbies) start by following the example in the Admin Guide quick start section. http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin23/quickstart.html I also note that common reasons for common errors, such as this, are discussed in the FAQ. http://www.openldap.org/faq/index.cgi?file=53

RE: alock + ldbm in 2.3.21

2006-04-13 Thread Matthew Hardin
Michael Ströder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Just for the records: OpenLDAP often complains about alock package even when using back-bdb or back-hdb. Also for the record: Messages from the alock package should not be ignored lightly (not to say that Michael implied they could be). I'll

Re: dynamic update permssion

2006-04-13 Thread Aaron Richton
Thank you very much in advance. Using version 2.1.30 You're unlikely to find any happy solution with 2.1.30. But if you run 2.3.21 you can do one better and modify a back-config database; the ACLs should take effect immediately.

Migrating passwd users on Cobalt RaQ

2006-04-13 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
What I need is for my Cobalt RaQ users to be able to authenticate against my Postfix server for SMTP, which uses a 2.3.20 server now. In case you not aware, the Cobalt RaQ 4 is a Linux 2.2 based server appliance by Sun. There is the openldap-1.2.9-6 package installed on the system, but I believe I