Ondřej, hello.
On 20 Jan 2023, at 16:19, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> DNS retrieval and parsing of SRV records is the easy part, and libevent
> has code to help us with that already. It's the management of the
> backends on the tier (shutting down those that aren't listed anymore,
> adding those t
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 03:33:21PM +, Norman Gray wrote:
> Ondřej, hello.
>
> On 20 Jan 2023, at 10:47, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
>> That said, patches implementing some kind of SRV are welcome. The easiest
>> way might be to introduce an lloadd tier implementation that manages its
>> backend col
Norman Gray wrote:
>
> Ondřej, hello.
>
> On 20 Jan 2023, at 10:47, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
>
>> That said, patches implementing some kind of SRV are welcome. The easiest
>> way might be to introduce an lloadd tier implementation that manages its
>> backend collection accordingly.
>
> It's not a
Quanah, hello.
On 20 Jan 2023, at 15:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> There is no license noted in this file, which would be a requirement to even
> look at it.
No problem -- I've reattached a version with the BSD 2-clause licence included.
Is that an OK one for you?
Best wishes,
Norman
And...
On 20 Jan 2023, at 15:33, Norman Gray wrote:
> This exposes a function
>
> char* get_sorted_srv_records(const char* domain);
>
> which does a SRV lookup, and orders the records that come back according to
> the specification of RFC 2782 (though in a single pass, rather than the
> clu
--On Friday, January 20, 2023 3:33 PM + Norman Gray
wrote:
Ondřej, hello.
On 20 Jan 2023, at 10:47, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
That said, patches implementing some kind of SRV are welcome. The easiest
way might be to introduce an lloadd tier implementation that manages its
backend coll
Ondřej, hello.
On 20 Jan 2023, at 10:47, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> That said, patches implementing some kind of SRV are welcome. The easiest
> way might be to introduce an lloadd tier implementation that manages its
> backend collection accordingly.
It's not an OpenLDAP patch, but I've attached
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Stefan Kania wrote:
> Hi Ondřej,
>
> I know, that I can put more then one uri to the "provider"-entry of
> syncrepl. The questions comes up wile installing and testing lloadd. So it
> not a special lloadd-thing. In general I would like to know if I could u
Hi Ondřej,
I know, that I can put more then one uri to the "provider"-entry of
syncrepl. The questions comes up wile installing and testing lloadd. So
it not a special lloadd-thing. In general I would like to know if I
could use the SRV-records. That would make changing an OpenLDAP-Server
(an
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:48:45AM +0100, Stefan Kania wrote:
> hi to all,
>
> is it somehow possible to finde the provider in "syncrepl" of a consumer via
> DNS SRV-records.
> If I have several providers with lloadd in front of it and the consumers are
> only contacting the loadbalancer, the it w
hi to all,
is it somehow possible to finde the provider in "syncrepl" of a consumer
via DNS SRV-records.
If I have several providers with lloadd in front of it and the consumers
are only contacting the loadbalancer, the it would be nice to use the
SRV-Records of the DNS. I could then set up tw
11 matches
Mail list logo
