The CC26xx flash code does not support the CC2538. We'd need to add a new flash
helper, and add the details for the CC2538 to the flash code. I don't believe
I can get my hands on that quickly. Pointing to the new ti_cc26x0.cfg probably
isn't a great option as it pulls in flash support that
On 19.11.2018 13:39, Stuart Longland (VK4MSL) wrote:
Hi Tomas,
On 19/11/18 9:34 pm, Tomas Vanek wrote:
yes we all overlooked the pitfall that CC2538 belongs to the cc26xx family.
Can you please test with the last line of tcl/target/cc2538.cfg
changed to
source [find target/ti_cc26xx.cfg]
On 19/11/18 10:39 pm, Stuart Longland (VK4MSL) wrote:
>> changed to
>> source [find target/ti_cc26xx.cfg]
>>
>> I have no idea if CC2538 has any internal flash and if it will be
>> properly handled by the new flash driver. The old config had no flash
>> defined, so you should get the same
Hi Tomas,
On 19/11/18 9:34 pm, Tomas Vanek wrote:
> yes we all overlooked the pitfall that CC2538 belongs to the cc26xx family.
> Can you please test with the last line of tcl/target/cc2538.cfg
> changed to
> source [find target/ti_cc26xx.cfg]
>
> I have no idea if CC2538 has any internal
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
Oleksij Rempel (li...@rempel-privat.de) just uploaded a new patch set to
Gerrit, which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/4774
-- gerrit
commit ae0bddd610ec24977430c07fea3af3f0a3e7acec
Author: Oleksij Rempel
Date: Mon Nov 19 12:56:48 2018 +0100
On 19.11.2018 0:38, Stuart Longland (VK4MSL) wrote:
Hi,
Silly question. Can we get 7b03129916aa050f4d120a532659dbbba279f7be
rolled back temporarily?
commit 7b03129916aa050f4d120a532659dbbba279f7be
Author: Edward Fewell
Date: Thu Jan 18 20:48:11 2018 -0600
flash/nor: Add support for
