On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 03:50:43PM +0200, kristof.mul...@telenet.be wrote:
> 2. http://openocd.net
>This website is apparently offline for the moment. I remember it was a
> very good-looking
>website. You can visit a snapshot through http://web.archive.org.
>Looking at the (snapshot of
Hi @OpenOCD developers,
I really like the initiative from Mr. Liviu Ionescu:
> For a few releases per year I can handle the multi-platform binary
> distribution,
> as I already did. I provide 32/64 Windows, 32/64 Linux, and macOS binaries.
I think it would be great to make these binaries dow
> On 9 May 2019, at 08:08, Christopher Head wrote:
>
>
> ... Make that three. I think a couple of times a year would be nice, if not
> more often.
Great!
In practical terms, the maintenance overhead is minimal, we only need to add a
new branch to the repository (like 'develop') and enforce
> On 9 May 2019, at 10:09, kristof.mul...@telenet.be wrote:
>
> ... Releases for both Windows and Linux (and why not MacOS) would be great.
for a few releases per year I can handle the multi-platform binary
distribution, as I already did. I provide 32/64 Windows, 32/64 Linux, and macOS
binar
Hi,
I agree with Mr. Ionescu and Mr. McDowell.
A few releases per year would be great. Also, the project should no longer
carry the experimental 0 number. It's a mature and popular software.
Please don't forget the Windows users. Releases for both Windows and Linux (and
why not MacOS) would be g
