On 19.11.2018 13:39, Stuart Longland (VK4MSL) wrote:
Hi Tomas,
On 19/11/18 9:34 pm, Tomas Vanek wrote:
yes we all overlooked the pitfall that CC2538 belongs to the cc26xx family.
Can you please test with the last line of tcl/target/cc2538.cfg
changed to
source [find target/ti_cc26xx.cfg]
On 19/11/18 10:39 pm, Stuart Longland (VK4MSL) wrote:
>> changed to
>> source [find target/ti_cc26xx.cfg]
>>
>> I have no idea if CC2538 has any internal flash and if it will be
>> properly handled by the new flash driver. The old config had no flash
>> defined, so you should get the same func
Hi Tomas,
On 19/11/18 9:34 pm, Tomas Vanek wrote:
> yes we all overlooked the pitfall that CC2538 belongs to the cc26xx family.
> Can you please test with the last line of tcl/target/cc2538.cfg
> changed to
> source [find target/ti_cc26xx.cfg]
>
> I have no idea if CC2538 has any internal fla
On 19.11.2018 0:38, Stuart Longland (VK4MSL) wrote:
Hi,
Silly question. Can we get 7b03129916aa050f4d120a532659dbbba279f7be
rolled back temporarily?
commit 7b03129916aa050f4d120a532659dbbba279f7be
Author: Edward Fewell
Date: Thu Jan 18 20:48:11 2018 -0600
flash/nor: Add support for T
Hi,
Silly question. Can we get 7b03129916aa050f4d120a532659dbbba279f7be
rolled back temporarily?
> commit 7b03129916aa050f4d120a532659dbbba279f7be
> Author: Edward Fewell
> Date: Thu Jan 18 20:48:11 2018 -0600
>
> flash/nor: Add support for TI CC26xx/CC13xx flash
>
> Added cc26x
