Re: [Openocd-development] ARM-USB-OCD + LPC-H2148 openOCD Issue - SOLVED

2009-07-30 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Kevin Ames wrote: >        Just out of curiosity, did you have to set the jtag_speed > command in your config file?  It's interesting to know as you > are using the IAR J-Link instead of the ARM-USB-OCD that I'm using. I do not seed to set the jtag_speed in the con

[Openocd-development] ARM-USB-OCD + LPC-H2148 openOCD Issue - SOLVED

2009-07-30 Thread Kevin Ames
I believe I figured out what the problem was. I've found that the jtag_speed command needs to be placed in the lpc2148.cfg file. I downloaded the latest SVN (2570) and tested, with the same results occurring as before. I did a little digging around in the Sparkfun Forums and

Re: [Openocd-development] Benchmark data for various JTAG debuggers

2009-07-30 Thread Nico Coesel
Some more figures on the parallel port Wiggler interface and the target I'm working with: OpenOCD 0.1.0: Erase: 90 s Program: 651 s OpenOCD 0.2.0: Erase: 79 s Program: 544 s It seems 0.2.0 is at least 10% faster while using the same configuration. Another thing I need to mention is that my 0.1.0

[Openocd-development] EK-LM3S1968 Configuration File

2009-07-30 Thread Xiaofan Chen
I have to change the following line in the target config file from the following website. http://www.kunen.org/node/105 From: # 4k working area at base of ram $_TARGETNAME configure -work-area-virt 0 -work-area-phys 0x2000 -work-area-size 0x1200 -work-area-backup 0 To: # 4k working area at base

Re: [Openocd-development] Benchmark data for various JTAG debuggers

2009-07-30 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > This is an old data for Luminary LM3S1968 ( I may get it soon as part of > my work), seems to be rather slow. > http://www.kunen.org/node/106 > OpenOCD 0.1.0 release > wrote 6940 byte from file > /home/adam/src/Stellaris/boards/ek-lm3s1968/grap