Some more figures on the parallel port Wiggler interface and the target I'm working with: OpenOCD 0.1.0: Erase: 90 s Program: 651 s
OpenOCD 0.2.0: Erase: 79 s Program: 544 s It seems 0.2.0 is at least 10% faster while using the same configuration. Another thing I need to mention is that my 0.1.0 contains some other improvements that make it a few % faster than the vanilla 0.1.0. Nico Coesel _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
