Re: [Openocd-development] About AGDI interface of RealView MDK and SWJ support

2009-10-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
> So, SWJ gets nowhere in OpenOCD until SWD is working. > And we've seen no SWD patches at all. Actually we did, but it is a long time ago and they were very disruptive. We get SWD/SWJ questions every so often, but I'm not very excited... -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7

Re: [Openocd-development] [patch/rfc] update version handling for better GIT support

2009-10-06 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 05 October 2009, David Brownell wrote: > The guess-rev.sh script is now a tweaked version of "setlocalversion" as > seen in Linux, U-Boot, and various other projects. When it finds source > control support (git, hg, svn) it uses IDs from there. Else it reports > itself as "-snapshot", e

Re: [Openocd-development] About AGDI interface of RealView MDK and SWJ support

2009-10-06 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Duane Ellis wrote: > I don't know about the SWJ status. As I understand it, SWJ is the one-wire trace output scheme used by certain trimmed-down Cortex-M3 parts. It contrasts with the more typical clock-plus-N-Wire alternative (N in {1, 2, 4}). And it's built using a

Re: [Openocd-development] About AGDI interface of RealView MDK and SWJ support

2009-10-06 Thread Duane Ellis
simon qian wrote: > Does is possible to get protocol of AGDI interface of RealView MDK? > Then OpenOCD will be supported by it. As for AGDI - I have little interest in supporting Keil uVision - the closed IDE from Keil. http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.faqs/ka11379.ht

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] silence bad EICE version number complaint for Dragonite

2009-10-06 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, David Brownell wrote: > I committed both of yoru Dragonite patches. Thx. Nicolas ___ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] silence bad EICE version number complaint for Dragonite

2009-10-06 Thread David Brownell
I committed both of yoru Dragonite patches. ___ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

[Openocd-development] SourceForge terms changes

2009-10-06 Thread Igor Skochinsky
Hello All, FYI, a new version of SF.net terms of use has been posted and is to take effect on the 29th. http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sitelegal/wiki/Terms%20of%20Use Not sure if changes affect OpenOCD, but worth checking IMO. -- WBR, Igor mailto:skochin...@

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] silence bad EICE version number complaint for Dragonite

2009-10-06 Thread Nicolas Pitre
Dragonite has the same affliction as feroceon. Dragonite has the same affliction as feroceon. diff --git a/src/target/embeddedice.c b/src/target/embeddedice.c index 0d23c12..39f87c7 100644 --- a/src/target/embeddedice.c +++ b/src/target/embeddedice.c @@ -264,7 +264,8 @@ reg_cache_t* embeddedice_bu

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] Dragonite target script

2009-10-06 Thread Nicolas Pitre
Dragonite target script Dragonite target script diff --git a/tcl/target/dragonite.cfg b/tcl/target/dragonite.cfg new file mode 100644 index 000..d2e7e32 --- /dev/null +++ b/tcl/target/dragonite.cfg @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +## +# Target:Marvell Dragonite CPU cor

Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git

2009-10-06 Thread Magnus Lundin
My impression, after using git just a little, is that it is a good tool, it takes some learning for effective use. For development work it seems that it gives me much better support for testing several different versions of experimental code than SVN so here it is a big step forward. I do not k

Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git

2009-10-06 Thread Austin, Alex
> -Original Message- > From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd- > development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Grant Edwards > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:52 PM > To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] Moving t

Re: [Openocd-development] new lpc2xxx cfg files layout

2009-10-06 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 27 September 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote: > > > > If it doesn't ... seems buggish, but maybe you > > could declare it as a global. > > I works when I use a wrapper script, but doesn't work when I use > -c "set CRYSTAL_FREQ 1200" -f target/lpc2103.cfg In fact the same thing happens i

Re: [Openocd-development] jtag_init changes

2009-10-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:13 PM, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 05 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> if (jtag_init_inner(cmd_ctx) == ERROR_OK) > > What would you think about changing init_inner() so it > actually *fails* when significant errors are detected? Now that there is a tcl

Re: [Openocd-development] jtag_init changes

2009-10-06 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 05 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > if (jtag_init_inner(cmd_ctx) == ERROR_OK) What would you think about changing init_inner() so it actually *fails* when significant errors are detected? I still think that fix would have been sufficient to resolve the problem Michal reporte

Re: [Openocd-development] Switch to non-Berlios mailing list

2009-10-06 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2009-10-05, ??yvind Harboe wrote: > "Migrate away from Berlios" committe wants an alternative to > Berlios mailing lists. > > Some alternatives so far: [...] Anything so long as it works with gmane.org. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Not SENSUOUS ... only

Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git

2009-10-06 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2009-10-06, Ra?l S?nchez Siles wrote: >> !!! And if anyone objects to GIT, please speak up ASAP !!! > > I think mercurial [0] could be a good option. It's a well > known distributed VCS, maybe not as spread or known as git, > but it's fulfilling most if not all general users aspirations. > I f

Re: [Openocd-development] Switch to non-Berlios mailing list

2009-10-06 Thread Tom Moulton
LOL ok no problem... I thought most of the outage was the source, not the list... Of course I'd miss any messages when the lists were down :) tom -Original Message- From: Austin, Alex [mailto:alex.aus...@spectrumdsi.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 1:34 PM To: 'Tom Moulton'; openocd

Re: [Openocd-development] Switch to non-Berlios mailing list

2009-10-06 Thread Austin, Alex
Notice the number of messages with a subject line of "Berlios outage"... > -Original Message- > From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd- > development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Tom Moulton > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:17 PM > To: openocd-deve

Re: [Openocd-development] Switch to non-Berlios mailing list

2009-10-06 Thread Tom Moulton
There may be an obvious reason my suggestion is NOT good but here goes... Why not leave the mailing list here? I just want to make sure an obvious answer is not missed... tom ___ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de

Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git

2009-10-06 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
El Lunes, 5 de Octubre de 2009 22:07:35 David Brownell escribió: > On Monday 05 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > In short, the following will happen: > > > > 1. The source will be held in git. > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/openocd/ > > !!! And if anyone objects to GIT, please spea

Re: [Openocd-development] GNU savannah

2009-10-06 Thread Strontium
Most people I know think I'm a Nut job as well, which is why I'd prefer hosting at Savannah to Sourceforge on purely philosophical grounds myself. I just didn't think you all would want to change the project name. Maybe they would accept it a is, rules were meant to be broken after all. I th

Re: [Openocd-development] need help with config file

2009-10-06 Thread John Rigby
I agree that using the expected capture value makes a lot more sense than using the zero id. I'll send a patch later today. On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:49 AM, David Brownell wrote: > On Saturday 03 October 2009, John Rigby wrote: > > You were right about the ir lengths, but I also had to put back

Re: [Openocd-development] Berlios outage

2009-10-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: > Øyvind Harboe wrote: >>> >>> My vote is for a server that supports http for read-only access :-) >> >> We need and want a git mirror. That git mirror will support http. >> >> We haven't decided which mirror yet though. > > Thanks for testing to R

Re: [Openocd-development] Switch to non-Berlios mailing list

2009-10-06 Thread Dirk Behme
Øyvind Harboe wrote: > "Migrate away from Berlios" committe wants an alternative > to Berlios mailing lists. > > Some alternatives so far: > > - Set up seperate openocd.org server => not going to happen. We > don't have the resources and dedication to run it. > - sourceforge mailing lists apparen

Re: [Openocd-development] Berlios outage

2009-10-06 Thread Dirk Behme
Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> My vote is for a server that supports http for read-only access :-) > > We need and want a git mirror. That git mirror will support http. > > We haven't decided which mirror yet though. Thanks for testing to Rolf! At least we now know that for http://gitorious.org and h

[Openocd-development] About AGDI interface of RealView MDK and SWJ support

2009-10-06 Thread simon qian
Does is possible to get protocol of AGDI interface of RealView MDK? Then OpenOCD will be supported by it. BTW: How is SWJ support going? I plan to add this support to Versaloon. -- Best Regards, SimonQian http://www.SimonQian.com __

Re: [Openocd-development] GNU savannah

2009-10-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
> The page looks like it has been written by people that have a very > limited view on the real world. I'd like OpenOCD to stay open for > any OS. Free, dedicated resources w/no advertisement followed up by diligent people powered by enthusiasm. *AND* you don't want them to be nut-jobs? :-) Good

Re: [Openocd-development] GNU savannah

2009-10-06 Thread Nico Coesel
> -Original Message- > From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd- > development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Strontium > Sent: dinsdag 6 oktober 2009 14:25 > Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] GNU savannah > >

Re: [Openocd-development] GNU savannah

2009-10-06 Thread Strontium
As per: https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/HowToGetYourProjectApprovedQuickly "we do not accept projects with the word "open" in their name; we suggest you replace it with free instead, or use another project name of your choice." I don't know if this applies to projects under savannah.nong

[Openocd-development] GNU savannah

2009-10-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
Does anyone have experience with http://savannah.nongnu.org? Worth considering for web pages, mailing lists and git mirror? I'm a little bit concerned that they don't have critical mass... -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash pr

Re: [Openocd-development] jtag_init changes

2009-10-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
Committed. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer ___ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-dev

Re: [Openocd-development] Berlios outage

2009-10-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
> My vote is for a server that supports http for read-only access :-) We need and want a git mirror. That git mirror will support http. We haven't decided which mirror yet though. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer

Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git

2009-10-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Nico Coesel wrote: >> 1. Berlios svn will be made read only and the svn head will be "deleted", >> leaving behind only a README w/reference to the openocd project at >> sourceforge. The entire svn history will remain available on Berlios >> indefinitely. > > Questio

Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git

2009-10-06 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 05 October 2009, Ronald Vanschoren wrote: > What was wrong with SVN? Let's start with the way "svn bisect" didn't work, while "git bisect" is quite robust. Being able to track regressions that way is a big win. (Though it's kind of a brute force tool...) And the way you can't do most