On 2009-12-24 08:34, David Brownell wrote:
That's a bunch of very off-topic messages for what looks
more like you mis-spelled 'address' ...
Ups [; Isn't there a way to thorow something like unknown sub-command?
4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing
On Thursday 24 December 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote:
On 2009-12-24 08:34, David Brownell wrote:
That's a bunch of very off-topic messages for what looks
more like you mis-spelled 'address' ...
Ups [; Isn't there a way to thorow something like unknown sub-command?
Surely. Someone would
On Wednesday 23 December 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Now, there is a small problem you pointed out: that two elf images
that are too close together won't work with the flash write
image erase option,
Don't forget the original one: flash erase_address was
erasing data which it was told to leave
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Austin, Alex wrote:
Read-modify-erase-write on per-sector basis?
That's more work than I want to do for now, but it would be a
more general solution.
My conclusion from looking at that code is that the intelligence
of the auto-erase code is ... a lot less than I've
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote:
When building standard configuration on Windows (MSYS + MinGW):
libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src
-I../../src -g -O2 -D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wformat-security -Wextra
On 2009-12-24 23:07, David Brownell wrote:
Curious. Cygwin and Linux builds don't have that particular
issue; I wonder why not?
This may be because official MinGW uses gcc 3.4.5 and that's rather
old... Yesterday I was trying to build a crosscompiler on Linux
(OpenSUSE) and this almost works
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
flash write_image erase image.bin 0x1000 bin
auto erase enabled
address range 0x1000 .. 0x000135d3 is not sector-aligned
Command handler execution failed
The following patch should help in at least some cases;
it doesn't insert sector
Freddie Chopin a écrit :
On 2009-12-24 23:07, David Brownell wrote:
Curious. Cygwin and Linux builds don't have that particular
issue; I wonder why not?
This may be because official MinGW uses gcc 3.4.5 and that's rather
old... Yesterday I was trying to build a crosscompiler on
