On Friday 12 February 2010 08:59:08 David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010, Marc Pignat wrote:
What happens when we flush an address that is not in the data cache?
We obviously *want* it to be a NOP... which is what section 2.3.11 of
the ARM920T spec (mine says ARM DDI 0151B)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Marc Pignat marc.pig...@hevs.ch wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2010 08:59:08 David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010, Marc Pignat wrote:
What happens when we flush an address that is not in the data cache?
We obviously *want* it to be a NOP... which
Hi there,
I've received the master branch by GIT, have run bootstrap, tried to
compile it under MingW, it compiles fine except the last link for
openocd.exe, it states:
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/Enrico/openocd/src'
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2
The master branch tip changes relatively often. Can you run git describe
and tell us the result?
From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de
[openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of EG
[guent...@striges.de]
Sent: Friday,
On Friday 12 February 2010 11:58:02 Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Marc Pignat marc.pig...@hevs.ch wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2010 08:59:08 David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010, Marc Pignat wrote:
What happens when we flush an address that is not in
Hi Guenther,
I just compiled last GIT under cygwin windows XP 32bits, with :
./bootstrap
./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --disable-werror --disable-shared
--enable-ft2232_ftd2xx
--with-ftd2xx-win32-zipdir=../../amontec/jtagkey/driver/d2xx CC=gcc
-mno-cygwin
make
Everything OK !
I can't make it work, but if I read well int arm920t_write_cp15_interpreted,
we should put
the address in value...
I mean we use MCR p15,0,r0,... and we put the VMA in r1, so it will be unused?
I don't know and haven't read up on what arm920t is really doing here.
I don't know
what
On Thursday 11 February 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Someone should file a bug report in Trac, to help make sure this doesn't
get overlooked next time.
Filed this.
(Note that there are other reasons to have bugs in the database ... without
records, it's hard to do any historical analysis, e.g.
Freddie Chopin wrote:
I've got snapshots of 0.4.0-rc1-dev compiled for 64-bit Windows systems,
but I cannot test that (I use 32-bit Windows). I can produce releases of
64-bit versions (just like the regular releases on my website), but
I'd like to test the executable, drivers, and the
