Øyvind Harboe wrote:
After a cursory inspection this looks good to me.
Agree.
Acked-by: Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
Freddie Chopin wrote:
I will violently oppose any attempt to add the option back to config
files for 2148 and 1768. Expect all sorts of bits and bytes thrown at
you.
Right now we need to violently demand this patch to be committed ;
I'm hoping to hear test results from Rolf soon, as long as
On mer, 2010-12-08 at 20:26 +, Spencer Oliver wrote:
- printed = snprintf(buf, buf_size, typ. word write timeout: %u,
- typ. buf write timeout: %u, typ. block erase
timeout: %u, typ. chip erase timeout: %u\n,
+ printed =
Sorry Laurent, I'm again here with other problems.
as I wrote you, openocd now recognizes the correct TAP but once I open
the telnet session and try to issue simple commands like a soft reset,
I get communication errors.
When I start openocd, I get the following output:
---
$ openocd
On 2010-12-09 10:07, Peter Stuge wrote:
I'm hoping to hear test results from Rolf soon, as long as he does
not discover any problem I think the patch should be committed.
I'm afraid they are hoping that we get bored with waiting for any
reply or decision, and that this good idea will die.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Freddie Chopin freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
On 2010-12-09 10:07, Peter Stuge wrote:
I'm hoping to hear test results from Rolf soon, as long as he does
not discover any problem I think the patch should be committed.
I'm afraid they are hoping that we get bored
Are you thinking about POP NAND memory manufacturer and product type?
Don't use OpenOCD; it doesn't have the NAND driver it would need ... or is it
just hiding from me for now? If you've got a working version of U-Boot, try
that.
I thought this file did it:
On 12/09/2010 08:33 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
On 2010-12-09 20:05, Rolf Meeser wrote:
--- Freddie Chopinfreddie_cho...@op.pl schrieb am Do, 9.12.2010:
Von: Freddie Chopinfreddie_cho...@op.pl
Betreff: Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] remove srst_pulls_trst
from LPC2xxx target scripts
An:
Rolf Meeser wrote:
Let me say that I fully support your change request now.
I have done some investigation on this, and found that this
configuration works reliably on all devices, including the very
first generation.
Great. Thanks for confirming this on more devices than I could!
Acked-by:
Merged.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
giuseppe massimo bertani wrote:
Sorry Laurent, I'm again here with other problems.
as I wrote you, openocd now recognizes the correct TAP but once I open
the telnet session and try to issue simple commands like a soft reset,
I get communication errors.
Seems simply like unreliable JTAG
Tomek CEDRO wrote:
I've asked Samsung for documentation listing all its JTAG codes,
but that may take some time to
Hello Nick, the other problem is that Samsung may want you to sign the
NDA and keep quiet about the device, as they did when I asked for some
documentation for one device
Merged.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Merged.
So I should have complained more loudly. The double pointers are
horrible.
//Peter
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Merged.
So I should have complained more loudly. The double pointers are
horrible.
Ah, missed that. Well another patch is gladly accepted, meanwhile
it no longer crashes. Hopefully the fact that I
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
double pointers are horrible.
Ah, missed that. Well another patch is gladly accepted, meanwhile
it no longer crashes.
Fair. Two versions attached. One which makes the code two lines
longer and avoids double pointers, and a remix which uses only a
single double pointer
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
double pointers are horrible.
Ah, missed that. Well another patch is gladly accepted, meanwhile
it no longer crashes.
Fair. Two versions attached. One which makes the code two lines
longer and avoids
17 matches
Mail list logo
