Re: [Openocd-development] General SWD Support in OpenOCD

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
Hi Tomek, it's great that your focusing on functionality. Cracking the technical problems and making a patch series that's right for OpenOCD are two hard problems. Perhaps better attack one at the time? One hard thing about SWD is to crack the technical problems, the other hard thing is to

Re: [Openocd-development] General SWD Support in OpenOCD

2011-06-13 Thread Tomek CEDRO
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote: it's great that your focusing on functionality. Cracking the technical problems and making a patch series that's right for OpenOCD are two hard problems. Perhaps better attack one at the time? exactly. producing

[Openocd-development] Status of building using Mingw64?

2011-06-13 Thread Liam Redmond (Rock Software)
Hi, It's been a long time since I built openocd (0.3.0), I used to build with mingw64 and it worked fine, I've tried today to get the latest and build it under the same environment I used before and I get some errors. So I have a couple of questions... The fist problem I get is in the Jim

Re: [Openocd-development] Status of building using Mingw64?

2011-06-13 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Liam Redmond (Rock Software) liamredm...@rock-software.com wrote: 1) Anyone else attempting to build using mingw64 and have any gems of wisdom? 2) Is it possible to build without Jim so I can come back to this problem another day? Perhaps I need to do a lot

Re: [Openocd-development] Status of building using Mingw64?

2011-06-13 Thread Liam Redmond (Rock Software)
Probably you want to update your MinGW-w64 installation. Under Windows, TDM64 is the preferred one to use or you can use Cygwin's MinGW-w64 cross compiler. Probably. My GCC is 4.5.0. I suspect this is the issue since you are reporting gcc version 4.5.2 (GCC). I got past the original issue

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
Just to clarify: this patch does nothing, it just moves files around. It makes subsequent swd patches less noisy. -- Øyvind Harboe Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] Moved git submodule routine before autotools invocation as they may depend on submodules. Bootstrap will first checkout modules then run autotools

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
From: CeDeROM cede...@tlen.pl --- bootstrap | 27 ++- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/bootstrap b/bootstrap index 0965245..7062fc0 100755 --- a/bootstrap +++ b/bootstrap @@ -1,9 +1,14 @@ - HEAD -#!/bin/sh -=== #!/bin/sh -e -#fetch

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] Moved git submodule routine before autotools invocation as they may depend on submodules. Bootstrap will first checkout modules then run autotools

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
From: CeDeROM cede...@tlen.pl --- bootstrap | 27 ++- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/bootstrap b/bootstrap index 0965245..7062fc0 100755 --- a/bootstrap +++ b/bootstrap @@ -1,9 +1,14 @@ - HEAD -#!/bin/sh -=== #!/bin/sh -e -#fetch

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want to start up with a new transport folder to organize the code a bit. --- configure.in |1 + src/Makefile.am |2 + src/jtag/Makefile.am |2 - src/jtag/adapter.c|2 +- src/jtag/core.c

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] Moved git submodule routine before autotools invocation as they may depend on submodules. Bootstrap will first checkout modules then run autotools

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
ignore this patch. I sent it out by accident. On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote: From: CeDeROM cede...@tlen.pl ---  bootstrap |   27 ++-  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/bootstrap b/bootstrap

Re: [Openocd-development] Status of building using Mingw64?

2011-06-13 Thread Freddie Chopin
OpenOCD versions from my website ( www.freddiechopin.info ) - 32- and 64-bit, the most recent one is a week old - are built with this compiler, but with the most recent version (GCC 4.7.0) and on Linux, as I found that easier than using Cygwin or MSYS directly in Windows. 4\/3!!

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Antonio Borneo
Øyvind, could you please remake the patch adding the flags -M -C to git format-patch and post it again? These flags will detect the file move/rename and highlight just the modifications. Patch review would be much easier. Thank you Antonio On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Øyvind Harboe

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want to start up with a new transport folder to organize the code a bit. --- configure.in|1 + src/Makefile.am |2 ++ src/jtag/Makefile.am|2 -- src/jtag/adapter.c

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want to start up with a new transport folder to organize the code a bit. --- configure.in|1 + src/Makefile.am |2 ++ src/jtag/Makefile.am|2 -- src/jtag/adapter.c

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] Moved git submodule routine before autotools invocation as they may depend on submodules. Bootstrap will first checkout modules then run autotools

2011-06-13 Thread CeDeROM
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote: ignore this patch. I sent it out by accident. Haha :-) Anyway I tihnk this git submodule stuff should be places _before_ autotools invocation, as the autotools use git submodules and will produce errors when they are

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Tomek CEDRO
Hey Oyvind! Thank you for support in this matter! Just please add those patches to new branch v0.5 as they bring general code reorganization and are not part of 0.4.x :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ___ Openocd-development mailing

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Oyvind! Thank you for support in this matter! Just please add those patches to new branch v0.5 as they bring general code reorganization and are not part of 0.4.x :-) I'll update master branch. The way git works we

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Tomek CEDRO
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote: I'll update master branch. The way git works we don't cut development branches, we just keep working on master branch. We may cut a 0.5 branch from some previous time in master history later on. Ah, there is

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Tomek CEDRO
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote: We never will merge 0.5.0 release branch into the master branch, ideally it would receive zero, but realistically might receive a few commits. Possibly reverting commits in master branch? Yeah now I know how things

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] transport: move files over to transport folder

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote: We never will merge 0.5.0 release branch into the master branch, ideally it would receive zero, but realistically might receive a few

Re: [Openocd-development] Status of building using Mingw64?

2011-06-13 Thread Liam Redmond (Rock Software)
It has been a while and I think my msys is quite out of date. Have reverted to building on Linux. Thanks. - Original Message - From: Freddie Chopin freddie_cho...@op.pl To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 4:22 PM Subject: Re: [Openocd-development]

[Openocd-development] Fwd: [Jim-devel] New release of Jim Tcl (0.71) soon

2011-06-13 Thread Steve Bennett
FYI. This release will include a number of bug fixes in addition to a small number of added features. It might be worth updating the version of Jim Tcl used by the OpenOCD. Cheers, Steve Begin forwarded message: From: Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au Date: 10 June 2011 2:55:01 PM AEST

Re: [Openocd-development] Active maintainers

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote: I'll update the berlios and sourceforge to reflect the active maintainers. We would of course be delighted if anyone below decides to take a

Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: [Jim-devel] New release of Jim Tcl (0.71) soon

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
Hi Steve, I intend to upgrade OpenOCD to the latest release once it is available. Thanks for your efforts! -- Øyvind Harboe Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex

Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: [Jim-devel] New release of Jim Tcl (0.71) soon

2011-06-13 Thread Steve Bennett
On 14/06/2011, at 3:45 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote: Hi Steve, I intend to upgrade OpenOCD to the latest release once it is available. Thanks for your efforts! Sounds good. It wouldn't hurt to test it *before* the release, just in case there is a problem and I can include fix it before the