I cant upload an image into internal SRAM (AT91SAM9).
it can really write only 20 bytes.
load_image into internal flash area works fine.
>>> But why it doesn't fail if it writes the other regions?
>>> It crashes only if it writes into internal SRAM.
>> Could it be that the load_im
> Anyway you can check this site to find any hoster with a code review
> ability:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_facilities
No gerrit listed. I've asked sourceforge if they can install it, but
I'm not holding
my breath.
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Co
Dear list,
I have already posted the attached script some weeks ago.
It enables the PLL of the STM32F107 and thus configures
the MCU to run at 72 MHz which allows for higher JTAG speeds.
Since this should be useful for everybody, I would like to
contribute it to OpenOCD. However, I am not sure h
Am 10/09/2011 12:37 PM, schrieb Simon Barner:
> Dear list,
>
> I have already posted the attached script some weeks ago.
>
> It enables the PLL of the STM32F107 and thus configures
> the MCU to run at 72 MHz which allows for higher JTAG speeds.
>
> Since this should be useful for everybody, I would
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Simon Barner wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have already posted the attached script some weeks ago.
>
> It enables the PLL of the STM32F107 and thus configures
> the MCU to run at 72 MHz which allows for higher JTAG speeds.
>
> Since this should be useful for everybody
(At least) in SWD mode with an FTDI programmer openocd is sending data
bit by bit. I am planning to send in a patch to fix that, but I am
currently unable to test it, because I am waiting for my SWD-capable
programmer.
Regards,
Ákos Vandra
On 9 October 2011 08:21, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> USB rou
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Transfer rate: 3 KB/sec, 13848 bytes/write.
>
> USB roundtrips?
Ḯ'll have a look with usbmon soon.
Akos Vandra wrote:
> (At least) in SWD mode with an FTDI programmer openocd is sending
> data bit by bit. I am plann
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > > Transfer rate: 3 KB/sec, 13848 bytes/write.
> >
> > USB roundtrips?
>
> Ḯ'll have a look with usbmon soon.
>
U+0618 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DIRT ON TOP? I
P.S. Is it just me, or the default reply address is the sender
himself, and not the list?
Regards,
Ákos
On 9 October 2011 23:28, Akos Vandra wrote:
> I am using the libswd fork, but I don't know how functional it is as
> of yet, because I don't have any hardware to test it.
> I just joined the
Akos Vandra wrote:
> default reply address is the sender himself, and not the list?
Please see
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html
Mailing lists are a third form of email communication pattern. (The
first two are person-to-person, and person-to-many-persons.) Using an
ema
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Akos Vandra wrote:
> P.S. Is it just me, or the default reply address is the sender
> himself, and not the list?
>
The list server doesn't set Reply-To to the list address, for some very good
reason which I have forgotten now. Easiest fix is to set reply-to-all a
11 matches
Mail list logo
