[Openocd-development] Flashing DM355 bootloader

the first bootloader on that cards? · Use hwecc4_infix driver mode for davinci · Use oob_softecc flag when writing to nand · Use oob_softecc_kw flag when writing to nand · A combination of any of them Thanks and regards, -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C

Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git

/hgsubversion/overview/ [3] http://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/stable/wiki/Home [4] http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2009/04/mercurial-support-for-project- hosting.html -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid

Re: [Openocd-development] arm926ejs is broken in 0.2

On Monday 06 July 2009 12:11:42 Øyvind Harboe wrote: I'm trying to do a bisection. It broke somewhere between 1600 svn head. Any arm926ejs testers out there? How is it broken? I think I'm using it correctly (r2240 and others) Regards, -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 6/11] Improve standard INSTALL document with OpenOCD-specific introduction:

checkout would be more convenient than whole openocd which would also include tags, branches and zy1000? Regards -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), España * T: +34 91 506 40 00 * F: +34 91 506

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD license

and not on a company that should encourage its products to be sell? (*) I don't refer you, Ronald. Regards, Pd: This e-mail express a strictly individual position. -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD license vs D2XX library

who build themselves. Windows users just take the binary from berlios, but for other OS installation methods are more OS dependent Regards, -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), España * T

Re: [Openocd-development] cif_probe failure

://www.jedec.org/download/search/jesd68-01.pdf -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), España * T: +34 91 506 40 00 * F: +34 91 506 40 01 ___ Openocd-development

Re: [Openocd-development] a minor victory

wonder what was special with it? Regards, -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), España * T: +34 91 506 40 00 * F: +34 91 506 40 01 ___ Openocd

Re: [Openocd-development] cif_probe failure

write_memory() to target_write_u8() and it can probe success. I 've no more idea about that. What's wrong? Is it a bug? Regards -- ZJ Regards, -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid

Re: [Openocd-development] PATCH] [0/3] cfi x16_as_x8 implementation.

On Friday 22 May 2009 20:16:14 Michael Schwingen wrote: Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello all: This start a patchset series for implementing x16_as_x8 cfi compliant feature. · 01-x16_as_x8-consolidate_addresses.patch · 02-x16_as_x8-flash_address.patch · 03-x16_as_x8

[Openocd-development] PATCH] [0/3] cfi x16_as_x8 implementation.

. I hope this patchset is considered for version 0.2.0. But a little testing should confirm this. [0] http://www.jedec.org/download/search/jesd68-01.pdf -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid

Re: [Openocd-development] PATCH] [1/3] cfi x16_as_x8 implementation.

On Friday 22 May 2009 12:20:57 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello all: This start a patchset series for implementing x16_as_x8 cfi compliant feature. · 01-x16_as_x8-consolidate_addresses.patch · 02-x16_as_x8-flash_address.patch · 03-x16_as_x8-multibyte_read.patch I have taken

Re: [Openocd-development] PATCH] [2/3] cfi x16_as_x8 implementation.

On Friday 22 May 2009 12:20:57 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello all: This start a patchset series for implementing x16_as_x8 cfi compliant feature. · 01-x16_as_x8-consolidate_addresses.patch · 02-x16_as_x8-flash_address.patch · 03-x16_as_x8-multibyte_read.patch I have taken

Re: [Openocd-development] PATCH] [3/3] cfi x16_as_x8 implementation.

On Friday 22 May 2009 12:20:57 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello all: This start a patchset series for implementing x16_as_x8 cfi compliant feature. · 01-x16_as_x8-consolidate_addresses.patch · 02-x16_as_x8-flash_address.patch · 03-x16_as_x8-multibyte_read.patch I have taken

Re: [Openocd-development] [RFC][PATCH] [0/4] x16_as_x8 tentative implementation.

as I've send it temporarily while working on the above point. If you prefer this, let me know if you prefer a monolithic patch or will you apply each of them (preferred for me). I'm all ears ;) Regards On May 19, 2009, at 3:54 AM, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello: This is my first try

[Openocd-development] [RFC][PATCH] [0/4] x16_as_x8 tentative implementation.

of 0x0 and 0x2 in the 16bit case. Do a byte by byte read in the x16_as_x8 case. Regards, -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), España * T: +34 91 506 40 00 * F: +34 91 506 40 01

Re: [Openocd-development] [RFC][PATCH] [1/4] x16_as_x8 tentative implementation.

On Tuesday 19 May 2009 12:54:31 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello: This is my first try to implement the x16_as_x8 flash bank option. It is working for me as I would expect flash to work, but please consider this patchset as work in progress since it may still has some flaws. Al patches

Re: [Openocd-development] [RFC][PATCH] [2/4] x16_as_x8 tentative implementation.

On Tuesday 19 May 2009 12:54:31 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello: This is my first try to implement the x16_as_x8 flash bank option. It is working for me as I would expect flash to work, but please consider this patchset as work in progress since it may still has some flaws. Al patches

Re: [Openocd-development] [RFC][PATCH] [3/4] x16_as_x8 tentative implementation.

On Tuesday 19 May 2009 12:54:31 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello: This is my first try to implement the x16_as_x8 flash bank option. It is working for me as I would expect flash to work, but please consider this patchset as work in progress since it may still has some flaws. Al patches

Re: [Openocd-development] [RFC][PATCH] [4/4] x16_as_x8 tentative implementation.

On Tuesday 19 May 2009 12:54:31 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello: This is my first try to implement the x16_as_x8 flash bank option. It is working for me as I would expect flash to work, but please consider this patchset as work in progress since it may still has some flaws. Al patches

Re: [Openocd-development] CFI driver chip/bus width.

width. Only the lower data byte is output by the chip and the A-1 address line is used. So in summary, one 16bit width flash chip used as 8bit width by a 8bit data width processor. On Thursday 14 May 2009 22:31:08 Michael Schwingen wrote: Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: Hello all: I have

[Openocd-development] CFI driver chip/bus width.

, but I thought that I'd rather bring the topic to the list so I can directly go for a ultimate solution and not workarounds as I'm using right now. Comments are welcome. Regards, -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje INFOGLOBAL, S. A. * C/ Virgilio, 2. Ciudad de la Imagen. 28223

[Openocd-development] Post attach event

build r1411. Is there an implemented event handling this situation? If so, which one would it be? If this requires not much complicated coding I could see the possibility to code it myself, with some indications, of course :) Regards, -- Raúl Sánchez Siles Departamento de Montaje