A common way of handling these types of format-string differences for
32/64 bit cases is to define macros named things like PRIX32 which
expands to the proper % sequence to print a 32-bit number as hex. We
could do something similar for size_t and introduce something like
PRIuSIZE. For an
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Michael Bruck wrote:
> At least the arm11 port has a macro ZU that is intended to be used
> when size_t is printed. I recently saw a patch that ignored that, but
> I didn't comment on this error because it is like fighting windmills.
> Someone who regularly compil
At least the arm11 port has a macro ZU that is intended to be used
when size_t is printed. I recently saw a patch that ignored that, but
I didn't comment on this error because it is like fighting windmills.
Someone who regularly compiles mingw (or a cross-compile farm) would
be in a better position
On 16/05/2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I take it GCC is used to build on Windows so we don't have
> to worry, overly much, about Visual C++ oddities w/C.
Mingw uses GCC to compile, but it uses the VC++ C runtime library. So
I think you do need to be a bit careful sometimes, eg with the C99
print
Committed.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://consulting.zylin.com
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 21:10 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 14:37 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> >> Hmmm I love true & false as much as the next guy + I'd even like to
> >> see some restrained usage of C++ instead of all
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 14:37 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> Hmmm I love true & false as much as the next guy + I'd even like to
>> see some restrained usage of C++ instead of all the ad hoc constructs
>> in C that mimic object oriented featur
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 14:37 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Hmmm I love true & false as much as the next guy + I'd even like to
> see some restrained usage of C++ instead of all the ad hoc constructs
> in C that mimic object oriented features...
>
> I think it would be wrong of me to commit this
(I thought I replied to this, but it seems the mail got lost.)
I would suggest to apply it if no one objects rather than to wait if
someone chimes in on this trivial change.
Also bool is C99
Michael
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Hmmm I love true & false as much
Hmmm I love true & false as much as the next guy + I'd even like to
see some restrained usage of C++ instead of all the ad hoc constructs
in C that mimic object oriented features...
I think it would be wrong of me to commit this unless there is somebody
else that speaks up for it too
--
Changing ir_scan to bool more clearly illustrates its semantics and use:
- change 'ir_scan' from 'int' to 'bool' to document its semantics
Michael
openocd-ir_scan-to-bool-290d4d1
Description: Binary data
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-
11 matches
Mail list logo
