Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD [not] broken

2009-12-13 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:41 PM, David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 13 December 2009, Benjamin Schmidt wrote: >> Not sure if interesting to anyone, but I just ran svn head againt cppcheck... > > Much more relevant to see it against current git. > > The SVN tree is obsolete, nobody should be using

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD [not] broken

2009-12-13 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 13 December 2009, David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 13 December 2009, Benjamin Schmidt wrote: > > Not sure if interesting to anyone, but I just ran svn head againt > > cppcheck... > > Much more relevant to see it against current git. And to clarify why: several of those path names no

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD [not] broken

2009-12-13 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 13 December 2009, Benjamin Schmidt wrote: > Not sure if interesting to anyone, but I just ran svn head againt cppcheck... Much more relevant to see it against current git. The SVN tree is obsolete, nobody should be using it... ___ Openocd-dev

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD [not] broken

2009-12-13 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 13 December 2009, Carsten Breuer wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MISRA So if you have access to MISRA tools and specifications, which aren't exactly public ... are you intending to submit any patches to address related issues? Or maybe at least post the results of some MISRA analy