On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:55:06AM -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
>
> git makes the merging easier, but there is still the people problem of
> finding the development branch to try it out.
Then in that case I highly recommend to anyone who wants to use open
tools with the mc1322x series of parts to
On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Mariano Alvira wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:19:06AM -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
Can we just open a branch in the main OpenOCD repo instead? Having
separate repos just make it more difficult to track things down and
do
merges.
I think git makes this eas
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:19:06AM -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
>
> Can we just open a branch in the main OpenOCD repo instead? Having
> separate repos just make it more difficult to track things down and do
> merges.
>
I think git makes this easy. This way you can do your thing and I can
do mi
On Apr 22, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Mariano Alvira wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:55:46PM -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
* MC1322x target support
- integrate and test support from Jeff and Duane
- get working with a known good interface (i.e. not today's jlink)
I plan to be working on this (hi every
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:55:46PM -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
>
> * MC1322x target support
> - integrate and test support from Jeff and Duane
> - get working with a known good interface (i.e. not today's jlink)
>
I plan to be working on this (hi everyone. I haven't posted yet, but
have been li
Nico Coesel wrote:
> Zach,
>
>> CC: Openocd-Dev
>> Onderwerp: Re: [Openocd-development] my tech proposal
>>
>> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:35 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote:
>>> Zach,
>>> There are a few things missing on your list which I think
&g
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 13:00 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> >> - New targets?
>> >
>> > Any that you have in mind? Coldfire and Cortex are on thanks to Nico.
>> > MC1322x from Jeff. I have added an "insert your target here" item.
>>
>> arm11 ha
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 13:00 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> >> - New targets?
> >
> > Any that you have in mind? Coldfire and Cortex are on thanks to Nico.
> > MC1322x from Jeff. I have added an "insert your target here" item.
>
> arm11 has a lot of support already, but could need more love...
Ca
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 12:59 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote:
[snip]
> I looked at the BDM project Xiaofan posted. It seems like a good
> starting point. It also has routines for external flash. Maybe its worth
> to look into it to get some fresh ideas on the cfi implementation as
> well. I used to have a
>> - New targets?
>
> Any that you have in mind? Coldfire and Cortex are on thanks to Nico.
> MC1322x from Jeff. I have added an "insert your target here" item.
arm11 has a lot of support already, but could need more love...
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting service
Zach,
> CC: Openocd-Dev
> Onderwerp: Re: [Openocd-development] my tech proposal
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:35 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote:
> > Zach,
> > There are a few things missing on your list which I think
> are important:
> >
> > - Coldfire suppor
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 08:04 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Great posting! Can I suggest that you create this as a patch against
> svn so we can match up the todo.txt list against an actual version of
> the OpenOCD svn history?
Can't I simply claim that it's on The List? ;) I definitely agree that
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:43 +0800, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> > These will appear in the next revision of my list. I have been thinking
> > about what I want my next "hobby" board to be, and the Cortex A8 has
> > been one possible choice. [[I am no
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> These will appear in the next revision of my list. I have been thinking
> about what I want my next "hobby" board to be, and the Cortex A8 has
> been one possible choice. [[I am now hoping a board vendor reads this,
> recognizes their opportun
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:35 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote:
> Zach,
> There are a few things missing on your list which I think are important:
>
> - Coldfire support (which is basically an enhanced 68000 core) would be
> nice. There is no open source solution out there to program Coldfire
> controllers
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de
> [mailto:openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] Namens
> Zach Welch
> Verzonden: woensdag 22 april 2009 4:56
> Aan: Openocd-Dev
> Onderwerp: [Openocd-development] my tech proposal
&
Great posting! Can I suggest that you create this as a patch against
svn so we can match up the todo.txt list against an actual version of
the OpenOCD svn history?
W.r.t. churn, I think it would be helpful, as you do, to try to get
a lot of those "warning fixes" out of the way so that at least the
Hi all,
This message follows my sentiments about the human side of OpenOCD with
a more technically focused perspective.
First off: if you had conflicts that prevent a clean 'svn diff' patch,
you should be able to copy your original pre-merged files (the .mine
files) into a fresh working copy of t
18 matches
Mail list logo
