OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-01-25 08:49
Tracking Duration: 1:48:22 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:671 sources (443 packages)
Tracking Result: 591 up-to-date, 9 out-dated, 71 error
The following 9 sources were determined to be out-da
8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
Group:Editor
License: GPL
-Version: 0.5.21
-Release: 20030123
+Version: 0.6.01
+Release: 20030124
# package options
%option with_micono
@@ .
patch -p0 <
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src openpk
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
2 - 1.31
+++ openpkg-src/unixodbc/unixodbc.spec24 Jan 2003 19:11:44 - 1.32
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [BASE]
Group:Database
License: GPL
-Version: 2.2.3
-Release: 20030117
+Version: 2.2.4
+Release: 20030124
License: IPL
Version: %{V_postfix}
-Release: 20030117
+Release: 20030124
# package options
%option with_tls no
@@ .
patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
Index: openpkg-web/news.txt
===
37,7 +37,7 @@
Group:Misc
License: GPL
Version: %{V_linkchecker}
-Release: 20030114
+Release: 20030124
# list of sources
Source0:
http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/linkchecker/linkchecker-%{V_linkchecker}.tar.gz
@@ .
patch -p0 <
GPL
Version: %{V_here}
-Release: 20030123
+Release: 20030124
# list of sources
Source0: http://tidy.sourceforge.net/src/tidy_src_%{V_real}.tgz
@@ -44,7 +45,7 @@
# build information
Prefix: %{l_prefix}
BuildRoot:%{l_buildroot}
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-01-24 19:42
Tracking Duration: 0:24:00 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:671 sources (443 packages)
Tracking Result: 634 up-to-date, 10 out-dated, 27 error
The following 10 sources were determined to be out-
nPKG [PLUS]
Group:System
License: LGPL/GPL
-Version: 2.3.7
-Release: 20030123
+Version: 2.3.8
+Release: 20030124
# package options
%option with_ssl no
@@ .
patch -p0 <
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-01-24 19:00
Tracking Duration: 0:00:04 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:671 sources (443 packages)
Tracking Result: 0 up-to-date, 0 out-dated, 0 error
The following 0 sources were determined to be out-dated
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
> > +%description
> > +Awk is the one true implementation of the AWK programming language
> > +from Brian Kernighan as of 13-Dec-2002.
> >
> I don't get it. Was there a different implementation of the AWK programming
> languag
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src openpk
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003, Michael van Elst wrote:
>
> > [...RT...]
> > almost working snapshot
> > [...]
>
> And the crowd goes wild! Great.
> What is now still missing, because you're saying "almost"?
A setup script and some automatic configur
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> +%description
> +Awk is the one true implementation of the AWK programming language
> +from Brian Kernighan as of 13-Dec-2002.
>
I don't get it. Was there a different implementation of the AWK programming
language from Brian Kernighan
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003, Michael van Elst wrote:
> [...RT...]
> almost working snapshot
> [...]
And the crowd goes wild! Great.
What is now still missing, because you're saying "almost"?
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PRO
26,8 @@
%define V_real 2-0-15
%define V_here 2.0.15
%define V_log_dispatch 2.01
+%define V_html_mason 1.18
+%define V_libapreq 1.0
# package information
Name: rt
@@ -37,21 +39,28 @@
Group:Database
License
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael van Elst
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael van Elst
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael van Elst
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003, Michael van Elst wrote:
> Added files:
> openpkg-src/tripwiretripwire.spec
Do not forget to add the version tracking file vc.tripwire. If you use
"openpkg-dev new tripwire" for creating new packages and "openpkg-dev
release tripwire-xx-xx" for releasing it will cre
+Packager: The OpenPKG Project
+Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
+Group:Misc
+License: BSD
+Version: 20021213
+Release: 20030124
+
+# list of sources
+Source0: http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/bwk/awk.tar.gz
+
+# build information
+Prefix: %{l_prefi
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael Schloh
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
Summary: File and directory integrity checker
+URL: http://tripwire.sourceforge.net
+Vendor: Tripwire, Inc
+Packager: The OpenPKG Project
+Distribution: OpenPKG [JUNK]
+Group:Security
+License: GPL
+Version: %{V_openpkg}
+Release: 2003
10:56:31 - 1.12
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [PLUS]
Group:Misc
License: GPL
-Version: 0.9.8
-Release: 20030115
+Version: 0.9.9
+Release: 20030124
# package options
%option with_zlibno
@@ .
patch -p0 <
V_dsh 0.23.5
+%define V_dsh 0.23.6
%define V_dshconfig 0.20.8
# package information
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
Group:Shell
License: GPL
Version: %{V_dsh}
-Release: 20030114
+Release: 20030124
# list of sources
Sour
penpkg-src/openpkg-tool/openpkg-tool.spec24 Jan 2003 09:57:54 -
1.30
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [PLUS]
Group:Bootstrapping
License: GPL
-Version: 20030122
-Re
-Release: 20030116
+Release: 20030124
# package options
%option with_berkeleydb yes
@@ .
patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
Index: openpkg-web/news.txt
$ cvs diff -u -r1.3025 -r1.3026 news.txt
V_vl 6.1
%define V_vs 61
-%define V_pl 300
+%define V_pl 301
# package information
Name: vim
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Group:Editor
License: Charityware
Version: %{V_vl}.%{V_pl}
-Release: 20030120
+Release: 20030124
postgresql
@@ -37,39 +40,34 @@
Group:Database
License: GPL
Version: %{V_postgresql}
-Release: 20030103
+Release: 20030124
# package options
-%option with_openssl no
-%option with_odbc no
+%option with_cxx no
%optio
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> while beeing a nice idea I am not 100% convinced that introducing the
> three openpkg users gains much more than it costs.
Perhaps correct, but for some packages (e.g. Postfix) it was a hard
requirement to have those additional user/group ids. So t
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not really convinced about the use of fsl. IMHO the fsl approach has
> many more risks and annoyanced than benefits.
>
> - fsl is a library not an asynchronous daemon
That's correct and we've this async issue already on our OSSP l2 (the
underl
Hi,
while beeing a nice idea I am not 100% convinced that introducing the
three openpkg users gains much more than it costs.
While we are all aware of the fact that we gain not much security with the
introduction of these extra users we know that the extra protection from
falsely interacting wit
Hi,
I am not really convinced about the use of fsl. IMHO the fsl approach has
many more risks and annoyanced than benefits.
- fsl is a library not an asynchronous daemon
-- if fsl fails --> the application segfaults
-- there might be a performance impact (synchronous writing)
-- no support for e
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
Group:Utility
License: GPL
Version: 2.8.4
-Release: 20030112
+Release: 20030124
# list of sources
Source0: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/diffutils/diffutils-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
# build information
Prefix:
43 matches
Mail list logo
