This newer upstream release of python solved the problem. Thanks.
On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 06:15, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003, Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
> > It seems that when built on Solaris, the python package is missing the
> > contents of "/cw/lib/python2.2/lib-dynload/". Ther
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-05-31 19:27
Tracking Duration: 0:26:04 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:794 sources (523 packages)
Tracking Result: 777 up-to-date, 8 out-dated, 9 error
The following 8 sources were determined to be out-dat
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src openpk
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src openpk
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src openpk
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src openpk
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:54:39PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>On Sun, May 18, 2003, Tassilo Erlewein wrote:
...
>Linux Distros do it this way, yes. A clean system where you just have
>a single version of Berkeley-DB for all packages usually do not want
>those libfoo-VERSION.a stuff. In Open
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-06-01 07:29
Tracking Duration: 0:27:55 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:794 sources (523 packages)
Tracking Result: 779 up-to-date, 7 out-dated, 8 error
The following 7 sources were determined to be out-dat
1.12
+++ openpkg-src/nspr/nspr.spec1 Jun 2003 08:09:37 - 1.13
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
Group:System
License: MPL
Version: 4.3
-Release: 20030410
+Release: 20030601
# list of sources
Source0:
http://download.mozilla.org/pub/ns
58
+++ openpkg-src/mozilla/mozilla.spec 1 Jun 2003 08:17:48 - 1.59
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
Group:Web
License: MPL
Version: %{V_mozilla}
-Release: 20030508
+Release: 20030601
# package options
%option with_mailnews no
@@ .
patch -p0 &l
cpreplay.spec 1 Jun 2003 08:18:24 - 1.8
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
Group:Network
License: BSD-style
-Version: 1.4.2
-Release: 20030525
+Version: 1.4.3
+Release: 20030601
# list of sources
Source0:
-Release: 20030525
+Release: 20030601
# list of sources
Source0: ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/ncurses-%{V_base}.tar.gz
@@ -84,6 +85,7 @@
Patch18:
ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/%{V_base}/ncurses-%{V_base}-%{V_patch18}.patch.gz
Patch19:
ftp://in
stribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
Group:Terminal
License: GPL
-Version: 2.6.4
-Release: 20030531
+Version: 2.7
+Release: 20030601
# list of sources
Source0: http://www.vanheusden.com
Full_Name: Hans-Dieter Schuster
Version: infozip-20030306
OS: Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (217.115.74.12)
With Linux gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 (from OpenPKG 1.2) the build of the infozip package
is not complete: the package can be built, but some programs are missing.
The problem is the handling of a hug
On Sat, May 31, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Hans-Dieter Schuster
> Version: infozip-20030306
> OS: Linux
> Submission from: (NULL) (217.115.74.12)
>
> With Linux gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 (from OpenPKG 1.2) the build of the infozip package
> is not complete: the package can be built, but som
15 matches
Mail list logo
