This newer upstream release of python solved the problem. Thanks.
On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 06:15, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003, Matt Hoosier wrote:
It seems that when built on Solaris, the python package is missing the
contents of /cw/lib/python2.2/lib-dynload/. There are
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-05-31 19:27
Tracking Duration: 0:26:04 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:794 sources (523 packages)
Tracking Result: 777 up-to-date, 8 out-dated, 9 error
The following 8 sources were determined to be
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:54:39PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2003, Tassilo Erlewein wrote:
...
Linux Distros do it this way, yes. A clean system where you just have
a single version of Berkeley-DB for all packages usually do not want
those libfoo-VERSION.a stuff. In OpenPKG
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-06-01 07:29
Tracking Duration: 0:27:55 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:794 sources (523 packages)
Tracking Result: 779 up-to-date, 7 out-dated, 8 error
The following 7 sources were determined to be
@@
Group:System
License: MPL
Version: 4.3
-Release: 20030410
+Release: 20030601
# list of sources
Source0:
http://download.mozilla.org/pub/nspr/releases/v%{version}/src/nspr-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ .
patch -p0 '@@ .'
Index: openpkg-web
}
-Release: 20030508
+Release: 20030601
# package options
%option with_mailnews no
@@ .
patch -p0 '@@ .'
Index: openpkg-web/news.txt
$ cvs diff -u -r1.4676 -r1.4677 news.txt
- 1.8
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
Group:Network
License: BSD-style
-Version: 1.4.2
-Release: 20030525
+Version: 1.4.3
+Release: 20030601
# list of sources
Source0:
http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net
V_patch21 20030531
+%define V_patchL %{V_patch21}
+%define V_patches 21
# package information
Name: ncurses
@@ -59,7 +60,7 @@
Group:Terminal
License: GPL
Version: %{V_base}.%{V_patchL}
-Release: 20030525
+Release: 20030601
:Terminal
License: GPL
-Version: 2.6.4
-Release: 20030531
+Version: 2.7
+Release: 20030601
# list of sources
Source0: http://www.vanheusden.com/multitail/multitail-%{version}.tgz
Full_Name: Hans-Dieter Schuster
Version: infozip-20030306
OS: Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (217.115.74.12)
With Linux gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 (from OpenPKG 1.2) the build of the infozip package
is not complete: the package can be built, but some programs are missing.
The problem is the handling of a
On Sat, May 31, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full_Name: Hans-Dieter Schuster
Version: infozip-20030306
OS: Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (217.115.74.12)
With Linux gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 (from OpenPKG 1.2) the build of the infozip package
is not complete: the package can be built, but some
15 matches
Mail list logo
