Request 298 was acted upon.
This is an automatically generated message.
URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/298
Ticket: [OpenPKG #298]
Subject:
Requestors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Queue: openpkg
+Version: 5.0.1
+Release: 20031203
# list of sources
Source0: http://www.lua.org/ftp/lua-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ .
patch -p0 '@@ .'
Index: openpkg-web/news.txt
$ cvs diff -u -r1.7649
@@
Group:Web
License: Apache Software License 1.1
Version: %{V_opkg}
-Release: 20030918
+Release: 20031203
# package options
%option with_pth no
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
%endif
# list of sources
-Source0:
http
What is the RBL patch, and what are the consequences of not having it? Where
can I get more information about it?
Thanks,
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralf S.
Engelschall
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 3:48 PM
To:
Why did I get the message below in connection with my reply to Michael's
comment? My original message, as returned by the OpenPKG server, is
attached.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL
- 20031203
Summary:
RevisionChanges Path
1.80+1 -1 openpkg-re/vcheck/vc.perl-xml
1.104 +3 -3 openpkg-src/perl-xml/perl-xml.spec
1.7654 +1 -0 openpkg-web/news.txt
- 20031203
Summary:
RevisionChanges Path
1.24+1 -1 openpkg-re/vcheck/vc.perl-tk
1.39+3 -3 openpkg-src/perl-tk/perl-tk.spec
1.7655 +1 -0 openpkg-web/news.txt
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
Have Matthias' changes for openssh (below) been incorporated in
openssh-3.7.1p2-20031125.src.rpm?
No, they haven't. I've just rolled a new openssh package with the changes
though. It will be uploaded as soon as I can verify that it is a necessary
Another question: will the OpenPKG team inform Steve Grubb about the
problems found with and patches applied to his code? He indicates in his
README file that he will continue to maintain the package until Wietse
releases a new version (could be a while!), and that he'd like to know about
bugs.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
Another question: will the OpenPKG team inform Steve Grubb about the
problems found with and patches applied to his code? He indicates in his
README file that he will continue to maintain the package until Wietse
releases a new version (could be a
- - -
blender 2.31 2.31a
ecartis 1.0.0-snap200308141.0.0-snap20031203
gcc34 3.4-20031126 3.4-20031203
ldapdiff 0 1.0.0
perl
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
What is the RBL patch, and what are the consequences of not having it? Where
can I get more information about it?
The RBL patch allows one to specify dnsRBLs (Realtime Blackhole Lists) in
the /etc/hosts.allow file. We used this extensively with
V_main1.0.0
-%define V_snap20030814
+%define V_snap20031203
%define V_here%{V_main}.%{V_snap}
# package information
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Group:Mail
License: GPL
Version: %{V_here}
-Release: 20031024
+Release
Thanks for the info, Bill.
I take it from your reply (and from not finding any references to RBL in the
original code) that this patch actually creates this previously non-existing
feature?
Where can I find a copy of this patch, should I want to work on the
big-endian problem?
Thanks,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
Thanks for the info, Bill.
I take it from your reply (and from not finding any references to RBL in the
original code) that this patch actually creates this previously non-existing
feature?
Where can I find a copy of this patch, should I want to work
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-12-04 07:31
Tracking Duration: 0:31:03 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:947 sources (640 packages)
Tracking Result: 885 up-to-date, 5 out-dated, 57 error
The following 5 sources were determined to be
16 matches
Mail list logo
