Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/perl-www/ perl-www.spec

2005-08-17 Thread Christoph Schug
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall > Root: /v/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Module: openpkg-src Date: 15-Aug-2005 13:36:10 > Branch: HEAD

Re: (r_usr,r_grp) => (with_user,with_group) ?

2005-08-17 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: >On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Bill Campbell wrote: > >> [...] >> If there's a pressing reason for someone to use non-standard ownership, >> they're free to modify the spec file and rebuild for their local use. >> [...] > >Oh, yes, indeed. Thanks for the hin

[OpenPKG] Version Tracking Report (2005-08-18 07:25)

2005-08-17 Thread OpenPKG Version Tracker
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report === Reporting Time:2005-08-18 07:25 Tracking Duration: 1:02:38 (H:M:S) Tracking Input:1672 sources (894 packages) Tracking Result: 1585 up-to-date, 29 out-dated, 58 error The following 29 sources were determined to be ou

Re: (r_usr,r_grp) => (with_user,with_group) ?

2005-08-17 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Bill Campbell wrote: > [...] > If there's a pressing reason for someone to use non-standard ownership, > they're free to modify the spec file and rebuild for their local use. > [...] Oh, yes, indeed. Thanks for the hint, Bill. I've totally overlooked that this is also possib

Re: (r_usr,r_grp) => (with_user,with_group) ?

2005-08-17 Thread Matthias Kurz
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote: > > > Shouldn't all packages that use r_usr and/or r_grp get an option to > > specify a "real" user/group ? Else, when someone gains access to one > > package that uses r_usr/r_grp, he would also have ac

Re: (r_usr,r_grp) => (with_user,with_group) ?

2005-08-17 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: >On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote: > >> Shouldn't all packages that use r_usr and/or r_grp get an option to >> specify a "real" user/group ? Else, when someone gains access to one >> package that uses r_usr/r_grp, he would also have access t

Re: (r_usr,r_grp) => (with_user,with_group) ?

2005-08-17 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote: > Shouldn't all packages that use r_usr and/or r_grp get an option to > specify a "real" user/group ? Else, when someone gains access to one > package that uses r_usr/r_grp, he would also have access to files from > other packages. Also, this may support

[OpenPKG] Version Tracking Report (2005-08-17 19:12)

2005-08-17 Thread OpenPKG Version Tracker
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report === Reporting Time:2005-08-17 19:12 Tracking Duration: 0:49:12 (H:M:S) Tracking Input:1672 sources (894 packages) Tracking Result: 1590 up-to-date, 26 out-dated, 56 error The following 26 sources were determined to be ou

(r_usr,r_grp) => (with_user,with_group) ?

2005-08-17 Thread Matthias Kurz
Hi. Shouldn't all packages that use r_usr and/or r_grp get an option to specify a "real" user/group ? Else, when someone gains access to one package that uses r_usr/r_grp, he would also have access to files from other packages. Also, this may support people who are "used" to use special (common)