On Fri, Sep 16, 2005, OpenPKG Version Tracker wrote:
> OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
> ===
>
> Reporting Time:2005-09-16 07:14
> Tracking Duration: 0:52:46 (H:M:S)
> Tracking Input:1683 sources (896 packages)
> Tracking Result: 1601 up-to-date, 28 out
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2005-09-16 07:14
Tracking Duration: 0:52:46 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:1683 sources (896 packages)
Tracking Result: 1601 up-to-date, 28 out-dated, 54 error
The following 28 sources were determined to be ou
Hello all. I was curious if anybody has worked on this anymore and
perhaps found the fix? I haven't had any extra time since my last work
on this, but I will probably start looking into it more in the near
future if it hasn't been resolved. If it has been resolved, I would
certainly appreciate h
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
>
[...]
> > Oh, by the way: Is it possible that the whole KDE/Qt stuff is built
> > using shared libraries ?
>
> Well, our OpenPKG "kde*" packages use shared libraries only (but still
> do not work anyw
Super! Thanks.
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 20:41 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:21 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
> > >
> > > > It doesn't seem that any fixes for the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, Martin Konold wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 15 September 2005 08:01 schrieb Michael van Elst:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:04:31AM +0200, Martin Konold wrote:
> > > My personal main issue with the static linking is that in case I am
> > > developing a package f
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:21 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
> >
> > > It doesn't seem that any fixes for the default path problem has been put
> > > into UPD, at least for OpenPKG 2.3. Not sure if it
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:21 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > It doesn't seem that any fixes for the default path problem has been put
> > into UPD, at least for OpenPKG 2.3. Not sure if it was put into OpenPKG
> > 2.4 because we haven't upgrad
Am Donnerstag 15 September 2005 08:01 schrieb Michael van Elst:
Hi Michael,
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:04:31AM +0200, Martin Konold wrote:
> > My personal main issue with the static linking is that in case I am
> > developing a package for OpenPKG I have a _very_ hard time to make
> > _certain_
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2005-09-15 19:25
Tracking Duration: 0:59:30 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:1683 sources (896 packages)
Tracking Result: 1603 up-to-date, 24 out-dated, 56 error
The following 24 sources were determined to be ou
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> >
> > > upgrading package: xmlroff 0.3.5 -> 0.3.6
> >
> > 0.3.6 fails to build for me at least under FreeBSD/i386 5.4
> > (rm0.openpkg.net)...
>
> Bu
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
>
> > upgrading package: xmlroff 0.3.5 -> 0.3.6
>
> 0.3.6 fails to build for me at least under FreeBSD/i386 5.4
> (rm0.openpkg.net)...
Builds for me after i rebuilt and reinstalled pango and libgno
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> upgrading package: xmlroff 0.3.5 -> 0.3.6
0.3.6 fails to build for me at least under FreeBSD/i386 5.4
(rm0.openpkg.net)...
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo