Hi.
Shouldn't all packages that use r_usr and/or r_grp get an option to specify
a real user/group ?
Else, when someone gains access to one package that uses r_usr/r_grp, he
would also have access to files from other packages. Also, this may support
people who are used to use special (common)
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
Shouldn't all packages that use r_usr and/or r_grp get an option to
specify a real user/group ? Else, when someone gains access to one
package that uses r_usr/r_grp, he would also have access to files from
other packages. Also, this may support
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
Shouldn't all packages that use r_usr and/or r_grp get an option to
specify a real user/group ? Else, when someone gains access to one
package that uses r_usr/r_grp, he would also have access to files
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Bill Campbell wrote:
[...]
If there's a pressing reason for someone to use non-standard ownership,
they're free to modify the spec file and rebuild for their local use.
[...]
Oh, yes, indeed. Thanks for the hint, Bill. I've totally overlooked
that this is also possible
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005, Bill Campbell wrote:
[...]
If there's a pressing reason for someone to use non-standard ownership,
they're free to modify the spec file and rebuild for their local use.
[...]
Oh, yes, indeed. Thanks for the hint, Bill.
